Telangana High Court
WP/2387/2026 of Ms. K. Lavanya Vs The State of Telangana on 6 February 2026
COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWOTHOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM KOSHY AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA WRIT PETITION NO:2387 OF 2026 13447 | ...PETITIONER
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF FEBRUARY
TWOTHOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM KOSHY
AND
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA
WRIT PETITION NO:2387 OF 2026
13447 |
...PETITIONER
Between:
Ms. K. Lavanya, Wo. Late Sri A. Manikanta, Aged about 30 years, Occ.
Housewife, Rl/o. Flat No. 402, Srinidhi Residency, Gangabowli Bagh, Amberpet, Hyderabad-500013.
AND
1
The State of Telangana, Law and Legislative Department, Represented by its Principal Secretary, Secretariat, Hyderabad -5o0O22.
2. The Registrar, (Administration), High Court of Telangana, Hyderabad -
500066.
3. The Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Metropolitan Sessions Court, Hyderabad -
500001.
4. The Director of Treasuries and Accounts Department, Government of Telangana, Hyderabad.
5. Honourable Special Judicial First Class Magistrate for Excise Cases, Hyderabad.
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ. Order, or Direction, particularly in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus, declaring that the action of Respondents No.4 and 5 in delaying the release of death-cum-retirement benefits of the petitioners late husband, Late Sri
A. Manikanta, by issuing letters dated 2011112025 and 0511212O25, seeking a No- Objection for Equal Distribution and other details, despite the petitioner having already furnished all required documents and bank details, are illegal, arbitrary, and contrary to law, and in violation of the order dated 1510712025 passed in Wp No.12015/20:25 and consequently, direct Respondents No.4 and 5 to immediately process and release all death-cum-retirement benefits and entitlements due to the petitioner and her minor son, without insisting on any No-Objection for Equal Distribution o'any other unlawful condition that the petitioner and her minor son are legally en:itled to.
lA NO: 1 OF 2'026
Petition under Section 1 51 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to direct Respondents No.4 and 5 to immediately release provisional family pension and other immedierte financial assistance, including payment of at least 50% of the accumulated ()PS pension wealth, to the petitioner and her minor son for their sustenance.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI B. VAMSHIDHAR REDDY
Counsel for the Respondents No 1: GP FOR LAW AND LEGISLATIVE AFFATRS
Counsel for the Respondents No 2,3 & 5: SRI K.V.RAMAN, STANDING COUNSEL
Counsel for th,a Respondent No 4: GP FOR FINANCE & PLANNING
The Court made the following: ORDER
I
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P'SAM KOSHY
AND
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NARSTNG RAO
NANDIKONDA
W.P.No.2387 OF 2026
06.02.2026
Betrveen:
K.LavanYa
Petitioner
AND
The State of Telangana,
Law and Legislative DePartment'
Rep. by its PrinciPal SecretarY'^
Secretariat, HYderabd - 500 022
and 4 others
Respondents
ORDER: (per Hon'ble Sri Justice P'Sam Koshy)
Heard Mr. B.Vamshidhar Reddy' learned counsel for the petitionerandl\'[r.K.V'Raman,leamedStandingCounselforthe I{igh Court fbr respondent Nos' 2'3 & 5' Perused the record'
2.
The instant writ petition has been filed aggrieved of the lerrer issued by the 5th respondent dated 05' 12'2025 whereby the 5,,, respondent had requested the petitioner to furnish no objection certificate fbr equal distribution for CPS'
3.
After issuance of notice to the respondents, the leamed StandingCounselappearingfortheHighCourttodaybroughton recordthecorrespondenceissuedbytheCourtdated05.02.2026
I
where,in the 5tlr respondent has nrentioned that the said corre-(pondence has been erroneously issued, whereas, in fact, no such I.IOC r.vas requiled.
4.
Given the ltrct that the 5tt' respondent has conceded the fbct that tlre irnpugned letter dated 05.12.2025 has been erroneously issued and that she will not press upon the requirement of the said NOC :;ought fbr, we are of the considered opinion that there is no further dispute left in the instant case to be adjudicated upon.
5.
fhe rvrit petition, accordingly, stands disposed of with a directi'tn to the respondents to ensure that the amount payable to the petitioner on the death of the deceased officer towards death- cum-retiral benefits, including the pensionary benefits, be released tbrthr.vith, ivithout anv turther delay strictly, in accordance with the rules and guidelines governing the field. There shall be no order as to costs.
Oonsequently, rniscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand ciosed.
/TRUE COPY//
SD/-A.JAYASREE
STANT REGISTRAR
SECTION OFFICER
To,
1 . The Prinoipal Secretary, Secretariat, State of Telangana, Law and Legislative Department, Hyderabad -500022.
2. The Registrar, (Administration), High Court of Telangana, Hyderabad -
500066.
3. The Metropolitan Sessions Judge, IMetropolitan Sessions Court, Hyderabad - 500001
eer,,,*A - _-
4. The Director of Treasuries and Accounts Department, Govemment of Telangana, Hyderabad.
5. Honourable Special Judicial First Class Magistrate for Excise Cases, Hyderabad.
6. One CC to SRI B. VAMSHIDHAR REDDY, Advocate [OPUCI
7. Two CCs to GP FOR LAW LEGISLATIVE AFFAIRS ,High Court for the State ofTelangana at Hyderabad . [OUT]
8. One CC to SRt K.V.RAMAN, STANDING COUNSEL, [OPUC]
9. Two CCs to GP FOR FINANCE & PLANNING, High Court forthe State of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUTI
10. Two CD Copies
DAN
Pr'.e,..
HIGH COURT
PSK, J
&
NNR, J
DATED:0610212020
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
WP.No.2387 of 2026 DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS PMq, STATE o c) 2 0 ttB 2026 l.iF(jr * * 2-\ I1126