Telangana High Court
CC/4345/2025 of Md. Azamuddin Siddiqui Vs Sri Sandeep Kumar Sultana on 6 February 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM KOSHY AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUDDALA CHALAPATHI RAO CONTEMPT CASE NO: 4345 OF 2025 Contempt Case under Sections 10 to 12 of
t 348e I
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
FRIDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF FEBRUARY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM KOSHY
AND
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUDDALA CHALAPATHI RAO
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 4345 OF 2025
Contempt Case under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act '1971 , to punish the Respondents herein for their willful disobedience of the orders dated 03.09.2025 in W.P.No.23138 of 2025.
Between:
Md. Azamuddin Siddiqui, S/o Md. Burhanuddin Siddiqui, aged about 61 years, occ: Retired Chief Administrative Officer, Family Court -cum- lll Additional District and Sessions Court, Nizamabad rlo H.No.7-14- 500/A5, Khoja Colony, Nizamabad 503 001
...PETITIONER/ PETITIONER
AND
Sri Sandeep Kumar Sultana, Now Principal Secretary (Sp! Chief Secretary) to Government, Finance Department, Telanga-Secretariat, Hyderabad
...RESPONDENTTRESPONDENT No.1
Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri. Vonjari Raja Shekar Reddy Venkat Ram Reddy Counsel for the Respondent: Mr. S.Suman, GP for Services lll The Court made the following: ORDER
ti
it
I
I
I
ll
LI
ri
it
l:
i:
I
i
lr
I
i
IN TIIE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM KOSHY
AND
THE HONOURABLE SITI JUSTICE
SUDDALA CHALAPATHT RAO
C.C.No.4345 OF 2025
06.02.2026
Betwer:n
Md. A::arnuddin Siddiqui
...Petitioner
AND
Sandeep Kumar Sultania,
Now Principal Secretary
(Spl. Chief Secretary) to Government,
Financt: Department, Telangana Secretariat, Hyderabad.
Respondent
ORDER' (per Hon'ble Sri rtrsfice P.Sarn Ko.sh_v)
tr4r. S.Suman, learned Government Pleader lor Services-Ill appearing for the respondent submits that the order has since been substantially complied with.
2.
In view of the fact that the learned counsel for the applicant also arlmits of having received the substantial amount, the contempt case, at this juncture, stands closed. The respondent is
To
discharged from the contempt proceedings. There shall be no order as to costs Consequently, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed SD/- V.KAVITHA
DEPUTY REGIS
/TRUE COPY//
TION OFFICER
l.TwoCCstoGovernmentPleaderforServiceslll'High Tetangana. [OUT]
2. One cc to sRl. Vonjari Raja shekar Reddy Venkat Ram Reddy, Advocate loPUcl
3. Two CD CoPies
for the State of
tw
Pr/PSL
a,
\
HIGH COURT
DATED:11610212020
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
CC.No.4345 of 2025 CLOSING THE CC
F t HES t\ .l C) 2 B rtB 20?lr * * ':-{ ,.'a
- tr! L tq L I