Telangana High Court

CC/4345/2025 of Md. Azamuddin Siddiqui Vs Sri Sandeep Kumar Sultana on 6 February 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM KOSHY AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUDDALA CHALAPATHI RAO CONTEMPT CASE NO: 4345 OF 2025 Contempt Case under Sections 10 to 12 of

t 348e I

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD

FRIDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF FEBRUARY

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM KOSHY

AND

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUDDALA CHALAPATHI RAO

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 4345 OF 2025

Contempt Case under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act '1971 , to punish the Respondents herein for their willful disobedience of the orders dated 03.09.2025 in W.P.No.23138 of 2025.

Between:

Md. Azamuddin Siddiqui, S/o Md. Burhanuddin Siddiqui, aged about 61 years, occ: Retired Chief Administrative Officer, Family Court -cum- lll Additional District and Sessions Court, Nizamabad rlo H.No.7-14- 500/A5, Khoja Colony, Nizamabad 503 001

...PETITIONER/ PETITIONER

AND

Sri Sandeep Kumar Sultana, Now Principal Secretary (Sp! Chief Secretary) to Government, Finance Department, Telanga-Secretariat, Hyderabad

...RESPONDENTTRESPONDENT No.1

Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri. Vonjari Raja Shekar Reddy Venkat Ram Reddy Counsel for the Respondent: Mr. S.Suman, GP for Services lll The Court made the following: ORDER

ti

it

I

I

I

ll

LI

ri

it

l:

i:

I

i

lr

I

i

IN TIIE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM KOSHY

AND

THE HONOURABLE SITI JUSTICE

SUDDALA CHALAPATHT RAO

C.C.No.4345 OF 2025

06.02.2026

Betwer:n

Md. A::arnuddin Siddiqui

...Petitioner

AND

Sandeep Kumar Sultania,

Now Principal Secretary

(Spl. Chief Secretary) to Government,

Financt: Department, Telangana Secretariat, Hyderabad.

Respondent

ORDER' (per Hon'ble Sri rtrsfice P.Sarn Ko.sh_v)

tr4r. S.Suman, learned Government Pleader lor Services-Ill appearing for the respondent submits that the order has since been substantially complied with.

2.

In view of the fact that the learned counsel for the applicant also arlmits of having received the substantial amount, the contempt case, at this juncture, stands closed. The respondent is

To

discharged from the contempt proceedings. There shall be no order as to costs Consequently, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed SD/- V.KAVITHA

DEPUTY REGIS

/TRUE COPY//

TION OFFICER

l.TwoCCstoGovernmentPleaderforServiceslll'High Tetangana. [OUT]

2. One cc to sRl. Vonjari Raja shekar Reddy Venkat Ram Reddy, Advocate loPUcl

3. Two CD CoPies

for the State of

tw

Pr/PSL

a,

\

HIGH COURT

DATED:11610212020

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

CC.No.4345 of 2025 CLOSING THE CC

F t HES t\ .l C) 2 B rtB 20?lr * * ':-{ ,.'a

- tr! L tq L I

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead