Telangana High Court

CC/2628/2025 of Bhukya Meetya Vs Jitesh V. Patil, IAS on 6 February 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT " THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN contempt case Under sections 10 to 12 of contempt of courts Actto punish the respondents herein for violating, disobeying the Orders of

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD

FRIDAY,THE SIXTH DAY OF FEBRUARY

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

PRESENT

"

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN

contempt case Under sections 10 to 12 of contempt of courts Act to punish the respondents herein for violating, disobeying the Orders of the High court dated 04-10-2024 in w.p. ruo. z6ooo of 2024

Between:

Bhukya Meetva, s/9 syry1. aged abgyl g0 years, occ. Agricutture, R/o Tarrrya Tanda, Tekurdpar ri M a nda t, Bh adrad rikotnawciem oi.iiiii.

f.

iniilO

"'PETITIONER/ Petitioner

Jitesh V' Patil' IAS' The District Collector, Bhadradri-Kothagudem District, (Erstwhile Khammdm District).

...CONTEMNORS/ Respondents

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRt. AMARAGANI MALSOOR

Counsel for the Respondent: Gp FOR REVENUE

The Court made the following ORDER:

I

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD

THE, HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K. LAKSHMAN

CONTEMPT CASE No.2628 of 2025

DATE OF ORDER: 06.02.2026

Between:

Bhukya M.eetya.

Petitioner

AND

Jitesh V. f'atil.

Respondent.

This Court made the following:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORAL ORDER:

This contempt case is filed alleging willful and deliberate violation of order dated 04.10.2024 in W.P.No.28060 of 2024.

2. Videt the aforesaid order, this Court disposed of the writ petition directing respondent herein i.e., District Collector Bhadradri Kothagudem, to consider online application submitted by the pet;tioner and dispose of the same, in accordance with law. \ d {

3. Petitioner has filed the present contempt case alleging non- compliance of the said order. whereas, respondent has filed counter contending that in compliance with the order under contempt, respondent has already conducted enquiry and rejected the request made by the petitioner vide proceedings dated 27.09.2025. In the light bf the same, this contempt case is closed.

Liberty is granted to the petitioner to challenge the proceedings dated 27.09.2025 issued by the respondent. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in the Contempt Case shall stand closed. Sd/. N.CHANDRA SEKHAR DEPUTY REGTSTRAR

To, //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER

1. One CC to SRt. AMARAGANT MALSOOR Advocate [OpUC]

2. Two ccs to GP FoR REVENUE ,High court for the State of relangana lourl

3. Two CD Copies kul/BA q

I HIGH COURT DATED:06 t12trr-026

ORDER

CC.No.262g ot Zt 25 CLOSING THE CONTEMPT CASE '1,, HES 't €' t () 17 rrf q ?llrfi OF.'Spf.r { * r

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead