Telangana High Court
CC/1786/2015 of Smt.D.Nalini Reddy Vs Smt.Ranjeev Acharya, I A S., on 6 February 2026
COURT FOR THE STATE OF AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1786 OF 2015 Contempt Case Under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act to punish the respondents herein for violating,
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF
AT HYDERABAD
FRIDAY,THE SIXTH DAY OF FEBRUARY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1786 OF 2015
Contempt Case Under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act to punish the respondents herein for violating, disobeying the Orders of the High Court dated 01-04-2015 in WPMP No. 11753/2015 in WP No. 8920/
2015.
9[tQ!',I?!in! Reddy, Wo.K.Venugopal Reddy Aged 57 years, Occ Lecturer, R/o.
3-4-5261281102, A R K Nivas, Barkatpura, Hyderabad - 50O O27 .
Between:
2. Ashok Kumar, The Commissioner and Director cum D
1. Smt.Ranjeev Acharya, I A S.,, Presently Wo. B P Acharya, Prl. Secretary Education Department, The Government of Telangana Secretariat Buildihgs, Hyderabad.
...PETITIONER
lntermediate
and2
Education, Nampally, Hyderabad.
... Respondents/
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI M.V. PRATAP REDDY, representing SRI. V. MAHESWAR REDDY
Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR SCHOOL EDUCATION
The Court made the following ORDER:
t
\
IN T}IE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
THE HOT{'BLE SRI ]USTICE NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO
DATE: A6.02.2026
CONTEM
CASE No.1786 oF 2015
Between:
Smt. D.Nalini tleddY
...Petitioner
AND
Smt. Ranjeev r\citarYa, I.A.S.,
W/o. B.P. Acharya, PresentlY
Prl. Secretary Education Department,
The Governmert of Telangana,
Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad and another
...Respondents
-qBLB
Heard lvrr. M.V. Pratap Reddy, !earned counsel representing Mr. V. Maheswar Redcjy, learned counsel for the petitioner Z.
This Corrtempt Case is filed alieging violation of the order passed by this Court in \A/.P.M.P.No.11753 of 2015 in W.P.No.B920 of 2015 dated 01.04.2015, lI
\
3.
Today, when ttie matter is taken up foi- hearing, learned counsel appearing for the petitionei- submits that tire petitioner is not pressing the present Contempt Case.
4-
Recording the above subrnission, the Contempt Case is closed as not pressed.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pencling, if any, in this Contempt Case, shall stancJ closer.l.
Sd/. N.CHANDRA SEKHAR
DEPUry REGISTRAR
\
//TRUE COPYII
G
SECTION OFFICER
To,
1' one cc to sRr v. MAHESWAR REDDy, Advocate [opUC]
2- Two ccs to Gp FoR scHool EDUCATTON (TG) ,High court for the state of Telangana. [OUT]
3. Two CD Copies
ku
a
HIGH COURT
DATED:06/02/2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
CC.No.1786 of 20tS CLOSING THE CONTEMPT CASE UTHOUTCC,STS 7t \) 1HES \ i) t I ? ,,nq I J(r l
* Or e' r, }L