Telangana High Court
CC/2546/2025 of Manne Gnanamma Vs P.Pravinya on 6 February 2026
COURT FOR THE STATE OF TEI.ANGANA AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENry SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2*6 oF 2025 Contempt Case Under Sections 10 lo 12 of Contempt of Courts Act to punish the respondents herein for violating,
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TEI.ANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
FRIDAY,THE SIXTH DAY OF FEBRUARY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENry SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2*6 oF 2025
Contempt Case Under Sections 10 lo 12 of Contempt of Courts Act to punish the respondents herein for violating, disobeying the Orders of the High Court dated22-O7-2024 inW.p. No. 19413 of 2024
Between:
Manne Gnanamma, Wo. Shivaramulu, Aged about 74 Wa$, Occ. Agriculture. R/o Rajampet Village, Sangareddy Mandal, Sa-ngareddy Distiict.
AND
...PET|T|ONER
P.Pravinya, Aged about 45 Years, occ. Collector, O/o. the District Collector, Sangareddy, Sangareddy District.
... RespondenU Contemnor
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. RApOLU BHASKAR
Counsel for the Respondent: Gp FOR REVENUE
The Court made the following ORDER:
I
HON'BI,E SRIJUSTICE K. LAKSHMAN
CONTEMPT CASE No.2546 OF 2025
DATEz 06-02-2026
Between
Mrs. Manne (inanarnnra
Petitioner
Vs
Ms. P. Pravinya. District Collector,
Sangareddy District.
.. Respondent
This Clourt nrade the lollowing
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER:
This L--ontcmpt Clase is filed alleging willful and deliberate violation of order 1|ated22.07.2024 in W.P. No.l94l3 of2024.
2. I eamed Assistant Govemment Pleader for Revenue has produced cndursement dated 06.11.2024, to contend that the respondcnt has alreadl' complicd r.vith the ordcr under contempt. A copy of thc sarne is furnished to lcamed counsel for the petitioner, who seeks libe(r to challenge thc samc 3 [n the licht of' thc alorcsaid subrnission, this Contempt Case is closed. rranting liberty to the pctitioner to challenge the said endorscrnent claLcd 0(r.l1.2024 of the District Collector. In the circunrstnnccs of thc case. there shall bc no order as to costs.
i
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in the contempt case shall stand closed. Sd/- N.CHANDRASEKHAR DEPUW REGISTRAR ,/: c7 \ /,TRUE COPY'/ SECTION OFFICER
1. One CC to SRI RAPOLU BHASKAR Advocate IOPUCI
2. Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE ,High Court for the State of Telangana IOUT]
3. Two CD CoPies kul/BA o To, i ! j i I I I I I i
! HIGH COURT OAfEDi06t02t2O26
ORDER
CC.No.2546 of 2025 CLOSIGN THE CONTEMPT CASE WTHOUT COSTS I
i I I i I I i I I I I f,f*t\ 2 3 l'lAq 'q2[ TATCLI
* *