Telangana High Court
TREVC/34/2011 of CAXTON PRINTERS, HYD. Vs STATE OF A.P. COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICE AND ANOTHER on 6 February 2026
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM KOSHY AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA TAX REVISION CASE NO: 34 OF 2011 Tax Revision Case under Section 22(1) of the
13447 1
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
FRIDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF FEBRUARY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM KOSHY
AND
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA
TAX REVISION CASE NO: 34 OF 2011
Tax Revision Case under Section 22(1) of the APGST Act, 1957 R/w Rule 40
of APGST Rules, against the order dated 15 06.2010 in T A No.159 of 2007 and .160
oI 2007 and lA,No.161 of 2OO7 on the file of the Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal, Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad for the Assessment Year 2001-2002, 2002-2003 and 2003-2004 under APGST Act.
Between:
Caxton Printers, Red Hills, Hyderabad
...PETITIONER
AND
1. State of Andhra Pradesh, rep by rts Commeerctal Tax Offrcer, Commercial Tax Office, Khairatabad, Hyderabad.
2. Deputy Commissioner, (Commercial Taxes) Commercial Tax Office, Punjagutta Circle, Hyderabad.
..,RESPONDENTS
Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri Gopala Krishna Kalanidhi Counsel for the Respondents: Special Govt Pleader for State Tax The Court made the following: ORDER
I'HE HONOURABI,E SRT JUSTICE P.SAM KOSHY
ANT)
1'HE HONOURAI]LE SRI.IUSTICE NARSING RAO
NANDIKONDA
1'REVC No.34 Ol' 201I
06.02.2026
Betu'e ert:
Caxton Printers,
Red IIills. Ilvdcrabad
..Petilioner
ANI)
State ol Andhra Pradcsh,
Rep. by its Conrmercial Tax Ofllcer,
Cornmercial Tax OIllce,
Khai ratabad Ci rcle, H1'derabad
And another
. . . Respondents
ORDER, (pcr llott'ble Sri Justict l'.San Kovltvt Considering the f'act that on tl-re last couple ol occasions'
therc has been rro representation on behall ol the petitioner, we are lett rvith no option, bur to dismiss the tax revision case lor want ol'
prosccution.
2.
Ihe tax revision case is, accordingly, dismissed lor want of prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs'
\
I
i
?.
Consequently, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed SD/. N.SRIHARI
DEPUTY REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
ECTION OFFICER
1. The Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal' Andhra Pradesh' Hyderabad
2. One CC to Sri Gopala Krishna Kalanidhi Advocate [OPUC]
3 Two CCs to Special Government P-lelder for State Tax ' High Court for the " iLi";i.'irnJana at HYderabad (oUr)
4. Two CD CoPies
ViVPSI,
./.--
To,
W
I
I
HIGH COURT
DATED: 0610212026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
TREVC.No.34 of 2011 DISMISSING TREVC FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION t 2 4 t4t,R 2|]2[ * ;F.r- o K (J ( ttiE S74t sPArc {r U i $r 7r ?-b T