Telangana High Court

TREVC/34/2011 of CAXTON PRINTERS, HYD. Vs STATE OF A.P. COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICE AND ANOTHER on 6 February 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM KOSHY AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA TAX REVISION CASE NO: 34 OF 2011 Tax Revision Case under Section 22(1) of the

13447 1

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD

FRIDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF FEBRUARY

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM KOSHY

AND

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA

TAX REVISION CASE NO: 34 OF 2011

Tax Revision Case under Section 22(1) of the APGST Act, 1957 R/w Rule 40

of APGST Rules, against the order dated 15 06.2010 in T A No.159 of 2007 and .160

oI 2007 and lA,No.161 of 2OO7 on the file of the Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal, Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad for the Assessment Year 2001-2002, 2002-2003 and 2003-2004 under APGST Act.

Between:

Caxton Printers, Red Hills, Hyderabad

...PETITIONER

AND

1. State of Andhra Pradesh, rep by rts Commeerctal Tax Offrcer, Commercial Tax Office, Khairatabad, Hyderabad.

2. Deputy Commissioner, (Commercial Taxes) Commercial Tax Office, Punjagutta Circle, Hyderabad.

..,RESPONDENTS

Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri Gopala Krishna Kalanidhi Counsel for the Respondents: Special Govt Pleader for State Tax The Court made the following: ORDER

I'HE HONOURABI,E SRT JUSTICE P.SAM KOSHY

ANT)

1'HE HONOURAI]LE SRI.IUSTICE NARSING RAO

NANDIKONDA

1'REVC No.34 Ol' 201I

06.02.2026

Betu'e ert:

Caxton Printers,

Red IIills. Ilvdcrabad

..Petilioner

ANI)

State ol Andhra Pradcsh,

Rep. by its Conrmercial Tax Ofllcer,

Cornmercial Tax OIllce,

Khai ratabad Ci rcle, H1'derabad

And another

. . . Respondents

ORDER, (pcr llott'ble Sri Justict l'.San Kovltvt Considering the f'act that on tl-re last couple ol occasions'

therc has been rro representation on behall ol the petitioner, we are lett rvith no option, bur to dismiss the tax revision case lor want ol'

prosccution.

2.

Ihe tax revision case is, accordingly, dismissed lor want of prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs'

\

I

i

?.

Consequently, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed SD/. N.SRIHARI

DEPUTY REGISTRAR

//TRUE COPY//

ECTION OFFICER

1. The Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal' Andhra Pradesh' Hyderabad

2. One CC to Sri Gopala Krishna Kalanidhi Advocate [OPUC]

3 Two CCs to Special Government P-lelder for State Tax ' High Court for the " iLi";i.'irnJana at HYderabad (oUr)

4. Two CD CoPies

ViVPSI,

./.--

To,

W

I

I

HIGH COURT

DATED: 0610212026

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

TREVC.No.34 of 2011 DISMISSING TREVC FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION t 2 4 t4t,R 2|]2[ * ;F.r- o K (J ( ttiE S74t sPArc {r U i $r 7r ?-b T

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead