Telangana High Court
ITTA/302/2012 of The Commissioner of Income Tax- III Vs M/s. Sujana Metal Products Limited on 5 February 2026
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAO THURSDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM KOSHY AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA INCOME TAX TRIBUNA L APPEAL NO: 302 OF 2012 Appeal under Section 260-,q of the
13447 |
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAO
THURSDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM KOSHY
AND
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA
INCOME TAX TRIBUNA L APPEAL NO: 302 OF 2012
Appeal under Section 260-,q of the lncome Tax Act, .1961 aggrieve by the order dated 03.07.2009 passed in l.T.A.No. lo}4lHydlzoot for the Assessment year 2oo1-2@2 on the file of the lncome Tax Appeflate Tribunar, Hyderabad -Bench-B, Hyderabad.
Between:
The Commissioner of lncome Tax- lll, lT Towers, A.C. Guards, Hyderabad
...Appellant
AND
M/s. Sujana Metal Products Limited,
Hyderabad.
18, Nagarjuna Circle, Panjagutta,
...Respondent
Counsel for the Appellant : Ms.Bokaro Sapna Reddy (Senior SC lncome Tax)
Counsel for the Respondent : Mr. G. G. Ambareswari representing M/s. MN Advocates The Court delivered the following:
INTHE HIGH COURT FORTHE STATE OFTEI.ANGANA
AT FTYDERABA-D
THE HON'BIJ SRI IUSTICE P.SAM KOSHY
AND
THE HON'BLE SRI ruSTICE NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA
INCOME TAX TRIBUNALAPPEAL
o.302 of 2012
DATE:05.02.2026
llenvccr-t:
'l he (-ommrssioner oF Income Tax-III,
I l- '[tru'crs, A,C. Guards,
I Ir dcrabad.
AND
\I/s. Sujana Metal Products Limited,
l8 Nagarjuna Circlc,
l)rn jagutta, lJyderabad.
T]DGMENT: (pcr the Hon'ble Si Jutce P.San Ko l)
...Appellant
Respondent
I
Ilcard Ms. Bokaro Sapna Reddy, lcarncd Scnior Stantling (.ounscl for lncome 'Iax Department aPPearlng on lrehali oi thc apPcllant; and Mr. G.V Ambareswari, Iearned c()unscl rcPrese nting \l/s.\1.N. Advocatcs for the respondent'
2.
The instant appeal under Secrion 260A of the Income Tax Act, 196l,has been prcferred by the Department against the respondent /
assessee's Company aggrieved by the order dated 03.07.2009, in ITA.No.1084/HYD/2007, passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Bench'B'Hyderabad, for the assessmcnt ycar 2001-2002.
3.
The respondent at the time of flrling oI the appeal was known as M/s.Sulana Metal Products Limited. Subsequent\,, it is stated that the respondent Company's name has again gonc for a change by ln rebranding the same as M/s. Splendid Metal Products Limited
4.
The insant appeal is one which rvas filed in the year 201,2, ar,d upon being admitted, the matter stood pcnding before this Court for final headng. Today when thc mattcr is taken up ftrr hearing, the Iearned counsel for the respondent has informed the Court that the respondent Company has been subjectcd to insolvcncv procecdings at the behest of Punjab National Bank, the t'inancial crcditors of the respondent Company, who have approached thc National Oompany Law Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench ([or short 'NLC'I') ride LP (IB)
Pagc 3 of 4
No.66(r/7/lll)ll/2018 and the rcsPondent Company has gonc in [trr c()rp()rat(' rc srructurit]g of the same' The NCLT has at thc fust instarrcc rle crdcr datcd 04.04.2019, admitted the commencemcnt o[
Oorpo|atc lusolvcncl' Ilcsolution Process ([or short'CIRP) and also appointed ()uc Nfr. llsathisan as the Insolvency Rcsolution
l)rofcsstonal. rr,tro iu ttrrn, was directed to take chargc oi thc rcspondcn t ( .orn1'rrnr"s management.
5.
Siocc thc ( lll{l) has already commenced, we are o[ thc considercd opinion thar i[ at all if there is any claim that has to bc rnuclc lrr thc [)t:partment they would be frce to raisc thcir clairn :rgainst tht re s;rontlcnt {..ompany before the NCLT' As sucti, rtothing rern:rins tr, bc fulitrtlicatcd uPon in the instant appcal at this iuncturc'
(r-
\cc,,rrltnglv, thc lnstant appeal preferred by the Departrncnt st:rncls rlispt,sttl oi irr vicw of the insolvency proccedings dras'n arrinst tlrt rcsp,rudcnt (-ompany. However, thc right of thc [)cparttrtt rrt srl,rtls tcst'rt'cd to revive the appeal in tlrc cvcrrt it /'
,il
\
insolvency Proceedings before the NCLT pertatnlng ComPanY stands withdrawn'
to the resPondent
etilions pending i[ an1" shall stand
*55,S[lE,5ix H
As a sequel, miscellaneous P
closed. However, there shall be no otder as to costs To, ,/TRUE COPY/'
CTION OFFICER
The lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal'
Hyderabad-Be
h-8, HYderabad
One CC to Ms.Bokaro SaPna ReddY (Senior SC lncome Tax) [OPUC]
One CC to M/s. MN Advocates, Advocate [oPucl Two CD Copies
BA
w
DU
:.:.
HIGH COURT
DATED: OStO2t2O26
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
JUDGMENT
ITTA.No.3O2 ot 2012 APPEAL IS DISPOSED OF ii:; 'i.r. '.r:- 2 4 lifiq 2117 'r' rl)r: *. THE S{4 t o \:- \ ?')/ I ll-i;O Gr{'\ h*