Telangana High Court
WP/12977/2016 of D.SAKKUBAI, NALGONDA DT. AND ANOTHER Vs PRL. SECRETARY, P.R. DEPT., HYD AND 3 OTHERS on 4 February 2026
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYOERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUDDALA CHALAPATHI RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 12977 OF 2016 Between: 1 D Sakkubai, W/o. Venkateswarlu, Aged 40 years,
[ 3485 J
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYOERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF FEBRUARY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUDDALA CHALAPATHI RAO
WRIT PETITION NO: 12977 OF 2016
Between:
1 D Sakkubai, W/o. Venkateswarlu, Aged 40 years, Occ Business, R/ o. '1- 11215121A.. Saibaba Theator Road, Huzurnagar Town, Nalgonda Dist.
2. Venkateswarlu, S/o. Yaladeri, Aged 40 years, Occ Business, R/o. 1- 112151214, Saibaba Theator Road, Huzumagar Town, Nalgonda Dist.
...PETITIONERS
AND
The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Panchayat Raj Department, Secretariat, hvderabad The Dist Collector, Nalgonda Dist., Telangana.
The Tahsildar, Huzurnagar Mandal, Huzumagar, Nalgonda Dist.
The Nagar Pachayat, Huzumagar, Rep. by its Commissioner, Huzurnagar I\rlandal. Nalgonda Dist.
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 ol the Constitution of india praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue order or direction more particularly in the nature of Writ of lVlandamus declaring the action of Respondents No.4 in trying to construct Srriabh Complex in land admeasuring in 4C Sq Yrds in Sy. No. 211. Huzurnagar Town and Mandal, Nalgonda Drstnct by dispossessing the Petitioners, as illegai arbitrary and vrolation of principles of natural justice and violation of Articles 14.
21 and 3004 of the Constitution of lndia ar-rd consequently direct the Respondent No.4 not to construct Sulabh Complex in Subject Land and not to dispossess the Petitioners from their land.
l.A. NO: 1 OF 2016(WPMP. NO: 16249 OF 2016)
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circ rmstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondent No. 4 not to dispossess the Petitic,r ers from their land admeasuring 40 Sq. Yrds in Sy. No. 211, Huzurnagar Town :, Mandal, Nalgonda Drstrict pending disposal of the above writ petition.
counserf orthePetitio""'':#,HrJtr":r.fltt,f ilr,fi , Counsel for the Respondents No.1to3: GP FOR REVENUE
Counsel for the Respondents No.4 : SRI PUTTA KRISHNA i EDDY, SC FOR MUNICIPALITY
The Court made the following: ORDER
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE SUDDALA CHALAPATHI
RAO
WRIT PETITION No.L2977 of 2OL6
Dt-o4-o2.2026
Between:
Dopathi Sakkubai and another.
.. .. Petitioners
And
The State of Telangala, Rep. by its Principal Secretar5z, and three others.
. . . Respondents
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
The above writ petition is filed declaring the action of respondent No.4 in trying to construct Sulabh Compiex in land admeasuring 4O Sq.Yds in Sy.No.211, Huzurnagar Town and Mandal, Nalgonda District (i.e., subject iand) by dispossessing the petitioners, as illegal, arbitrary and violation of principles of natural justice and violation of Articles 14,2l and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondent No.4 not to construct Sulabh Complex in subject land and not to dispossess the petitioners from their land.
2. Heard Mr. Aravind Kumar Kata, k:r rned counsel representing Mr. P.S.P. Suresh Kumar, learned :ounsel for the petitioners and Ms. Gudipati Sharvali, L: Lrned counsel representing Mr. Krishna Reddy Putta, learned St mding Counsel for respondent No.4.
3. When the matter is taken up for hearing, l:arned counsel appearing for the petitioners submitted that the I etitioners have been doing pottery business over the subject lal 1. It is further submitted that the said lald was donated to ttr petitioners by the then pattadars ald title holders. The petit:r ners are eking out their livelihood from the sard business an < the proposed construction of a Sulabh Complex in their land u r uld cause a lot of nuisance, as it is situated beside a drain 4 . Learned Star-rding Counsel appearing lor r r spondent No.4 contended that, at present, respondent \o.4 is not contemplating the construction of any Sulabh ( iomplex. It is further contended that the subject land is a G: irernment larld and that the petitioners have no grievance wit: regard to the said 1ald. Horvever, in view of the interi-r order dated
19. O4.2016, passed by this Court, directir: g the Nagar Parrchayat, H.uzurnagar not to dispossess the 1t :titioners from the subject lald except in accordance with the d: -- procedure as i r1
Iaid down by law, Iearned Stahding Counsel fairly stated that respondent No.4 would strictly adhere to the due process of law, if they intend to dispossess the petitioners from the subject land.
5. In view of the above, the respondent No.4 is hereby directed not to take any coercive steps until a hnal proposal is made for construction or for undertaking any other activity on the subject land where the petitioners a_re doing their pottery business. In any event, if the respondent No.4 contemplates taking any action, the same shall be oniy in accordance with due process of law. 6 . In that view of the matter, the present Writ petition is I{ disposed of. There sha-ll be no order as to costs. lr Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand ! closed. SD/.P. PONNA KRISHNA SSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To,
The Principal Secretary, Panchayat Raj Departm nt, ecretariat, Telangana State, HYderabad
2. The Dist. Collector, Nalgonda Dist , Telangana 3 The Tahsildar, Huzurnagar [Vlandal, Huzumagar' Nalgonda Dist' 4 The Commissioner. Nagar Pachayat' Huzumagar, Huzurnagar Mandal' Nalgonda Dist.
5. One CC to SRI P.S.P.SURESH KUIVIAR, Advocate tOPUCl
6. Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUT] One CC tO SRI KRISHNA REDDY PUTTA, SC FOR MUNICIPALITY [OPUC] B. Two CD CoPies
\k esx
HIGH COURT DATED:0 410212026
ORDER
WP.No.12977 of 2016 DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS *no'h 'Fs. ( ( lHE S l4 1t ltl1R 2026 C) c'r J: I \ 1\ t#! *