Telangana High Court
WP/24217/2015 of M/S.SAPTAGIRI CONSTRUCTION Vs STATE OF TELANGANA,PRL.SCY,M.A.D,HYD,AND 6 on 3 February 2026
lSnt#"lflTi Ar HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUDDALA CHALAPATHI RAO TIT!ON 5729 17 0F 2A1N [ 348s I Office Between: 1111s, ^S^qOtgOili- Constructio_n, Rep. by its Partner C.H.Venugopat,
H,GH couRr to?.t#=",:,t6,5*j lSnt#"lflTi Ar HYDERABAD
TUESDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF FEBRUARY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUDDALA CHALAPATHI RAO
TIT!ON
17 0F 2A1
N
[ 348s I
Office
Between:
1111s, ^S^qOtgOili- Constructio_n, Rep. by its Partner C.H.Venugopat, #9-1-220, St. tVary's road, Secunderabad, Telangana State-5000b3.
AND
...PETITIONER
9tglg Of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary (tMunicipal Administration & Urban Development) Secretariat, Hyderabad.
2. The Commissioner, Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, Tankbund
Road, Hyderbad.
3. Ih" De.puty _Cqmmisqoner,. (Circle-18) Greater Hyderabad tVlunicipal Corporation, S. P. Road, Secunderabad.
4. thief 9ity Planner, Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, Tankbund
Road, Hyderbad.
5. Southern Power Distribution C.onpany of Tplangana State Ltd., Rep.by its Asst. Divisional Engineer (Operations) '" James Street, Sub-Oivision, TSSPDCL, Secunderabad.
6. Mr.Telukunta Amarnath, S/o T.Ramulu Aged about 58 years, Occ Business, H.No.51, Dr.Subba Rao Colony, Picket, Setunderabad-sbO 026.
7. lVlr.Dundoo Narasimha Rao- S/o. late Bala Narsaiah Aged about 82 years, Occ B usiness R/o.6- 1 -27 5, Pad maraonagar, Secunderabbd.
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the 2nd respondent proceedings No.TP/CClHClAFD|21321201513241, dt.30/0612015 and the consequential proceedings cf the sth respondent Lr.No.ADE/OP/D-XVIll/C-V/James Street SD/D.No.796/1 5, Dt.221712015 as illegal, arbitrary, contrary to law and contrary to orders of tlris Hon'ble and liable to be set aside and grant all consequential reliefs.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI KATIKA RAVINDER REDDY
Counsel for the Respondent No.1: GP FOR MCPL ADMN & URBAN DEV
Counsel for the Respondent No.2 to 4: SRI c.MADHUSUDHAN REDDY, SC FOR GHMC
Counsel forttre Respondent No.S: SRI N.SREEDHAR REDDY, SC FOR TGSPDCL
Counsel for ttre Respondent No.6: SRI PRABHAKAR SRIPADA
wRlT PETITION NO: 5729 OF 2015
Between:
tVl/s. Saptagiri Construction, Rep. by its Partner #9-1-221), St. t\ilary's road, Secunderab-d, Telangana
C.H.Ven
Office
...PETITIONER
AND
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. qtglg of Telangana, Rep by its Principal Secretary (Municipal Administration & Urban Development) Secretariat, Hyiierabad.
2. The Cc,mmissioner, Govt of Telangana Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, Tankbund Road, Hyderbad.
3. The Degruty C-ommissioner, Govt. of Telangaha Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, S.P.Road, Secunderabad.
4. Chief City Planner, .G_ovt. g[ Telangana, Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, Tankbund Road, Hyderbad.
5. T.Amarrath S/o. Ramulu, 58 years, H.No.S1, Dr.Subba Rao Colony, picket, Secunde:rabad.
6. D.Narasimha Rao, S/o. Late Bala Padmaraoriagar, Secunderabad. Narsaiah, 82 years, Rlo. 6-1-275, RR- 5 and 6 are impleaded as per C.O. dated 10103115 in WpMp.7975/15. .RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of [Vandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not considering the compounding application dated 26lo1t2o11, 29t12t2011, 1gt}4t2}12 and 0911012014 of the petitioner made for compounding I regularization of premises H.No-9-1 -219 to 232, St.tMary's Road, Secunderabad as illegal, arbitrary, unjust, contrary to law. I.A. N
:7627 OF Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents to consider the representations of the petitioner dated 2610812011, 2911212011, 18104t2012 and Ogt1Ot2O14 for compounding lregularizing the premises H.No.9-1 -219 to 232, St.Mary's Road, Secunderabad pending consideration not to take any coercive steps pending disposal of the above writ petition. l.A. NO: 1 OF 2016(WPMP. NO: 5499 OF 2016) Between:
1. Telukunta Amarnath s/o. Late T.Ramulu, aged about 58 years, occ: Business, H.No.51, Dr.Subba Rao colony, pbt<e[, Secunderaoiolza. ...PETITIONER No.1/RESPONDENT No.5
2. Dundoo Narasimha_Bro,S/o. Late Bala Narsaiah, aged g2 years, occ: Business, R/o.6-1-225, padmaraonagar, Secunderabbd." - -- l ... PETITI_ONER No.2/RESPONDENT No.6 AND . 1 Y{: s:plagilconstruction, A Registered.fa(nership Firm, Rep. by its chief Executive Pa{ner, c.H.Narayana, _ No.g-1-22d, st. Mary's rojo, Secunderabad, Telangana State-SOOOOS. .. .RESPONDE NT/VVRIT PETITION ER 2 I!: lrilcjO{ Secretary, -tMunicipal A^dministration & Urban Devetopment, Secretariat, Government of Telangana State. 3 The Commissioner, Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, Tankbund
4 fk ^D"PW Commissioner, Greater Hyderabad tVunicipal Corporation, S. P. Road, Secunderabad. 5 The chief city Planner, Govt. of relangana state, Tankbund Road, Hyderabad. ...RESPONDENTS
- Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavrt filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to permit the petitioner to file Addl. Documents copy of the order dated 30th June 2015 of the 3rd Respondent and copy of the order of the Hon'ble Court in W.P.IM.P. No.31 43312015 in W.P. No.2421712015 dated 07th August 2015 in W.P.No.5729 of 2O15, pending disposal of the writ petition. l.A. NO: 2 OF 2016(WPMP. NO: 5500 OF 2016)
in the affidav t filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to permit the petitioner to file Additional Counter Affidavit in W.P.No.5729 of 2015, pending disposal of the writ petition. l.A. NO: 1 OF 2015(WVMP. NO: 1115 OF 2015) Petition undei' Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidav t filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the irrterim order dated 17th l/arch 2015 in W.P. No. 5729 of 2015, pending disposal of the writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI KATIKA RAVINDER REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.1: GP FOR MCPL ADMN & URBAN DEV Counsel for the Respondent No.2 to 4: SRI G.MADHUSUDHAN REDDY, SC FOR GHMC Counsel for the Respondent No.5 & 6: SRI PRABHAKAR SRIPADA The Court rnade the following: COMMON ORDER
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAI) THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE SUDDALA CHALAPATHI RAO PETITION L7 of 2()1 DATE: 0,3.O2.2O26 Between: M/s Saptagiri Constructions ...Petitioner AND The State of Telangana and Others Respondents t \
COMMON ORDER:
These writ Petitions have been filed questioning the action of the respondents herein in issuing notices under Sections 452 and 636 of the GHMC Act, 195s, dated 2s.og.2oLl and 26.03.2012, in both the writ petitions on the ground that there are certain deviations from the sanctioned plans.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the building regalarization applications submitted by the petitioner have neither been considered nor rejected by the concerned authorities and further contends that on similar grounds, w.P.No.1536 of 2026, relating to the very same subject matter is pending before this court, and that this court, after hearing the 'I
parties, has granted an interim direction on 19.o 1.2026 restraining the respondent Nos.3 and 4 therein from taking any coercive steps in respect of the property bearing D.No.9- L-219 to 232, St.UIaqr's Road, Secunderabad.
3. In view of the pendency of W.p.No.1536 of 2026, the present'rtr/rit Petitions do not survive and subject to outcome of the said writ Petition, the respondents are at liberty to take appropriate action in accordance with law
4. Accordingly, the present Writ Petitions are closed. As a sequel thereto, all the miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall starrd closed SD/. M. OSMAN ALI BAIG ANT REGISTRAR /TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER
1. ONE C;C tO SRI KATIKA RAVINDER REDDY' loPUCl
2. OneC;CtoSRIPRABHAKARSRIPADA'Advocate[OPUC]
3. oneC)CToSRIN.SREEDHARREDDY,SCFoRTGSPDCLIoPUC]
4. one C)C to SRI G.IuADHUSUDHAN REDDY, SC FoR GHTVIC [oPUC]
5. TwoCCStoGPFoRMCPLAD.lVlN&URBANDEV,HighCourtfortheState oi Tetangana at HYderabad [OUT]
6. Two CD CoPies I To, BSR TKS
HIGH COIURT DATED i 0310212,026
COMMON ORDER
WP.Nos.24217 & 5729 of 2015 CLOSING BOTH THE WRIT PETITIONS, WITHOUTCOSTS D- TllE.s 1 9 rt8 ?a?6 * o (-) * t