Telangana High Court
CRP/3408/2010 of M. Neelopher Vs Mohd. Zameer Ahmed on 3 February 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR TI,IE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN AND THE HONOURABLE JUSTTCE B.R.MADHUSUDHAN RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 3408 OF 2010 AND CONTEMPT CASE NO: 344 OF 2011
!
I
I
l
,^
134e21
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR TI,IE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
TUESDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF FEBRUARY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN
AND
THE HONOURABLE JUSTTCE B.R.MADHUSUDHAN RAO
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 3408 OF 2010
AND
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 344 OF 2011
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 3408 OF 2010
Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of lndia, aggrieved by the Order dated 3010712010 passed in 1.A.No.702 of 2009 in OP No.432 of 2009 on the file of the Judge, Family Court, Secunderabad.
Between:
M. Neelopher, W/o lVohd. Zameer Ahmed Housewife R/o H.No. 2273, Saibaba Nagar ECIL Post, Hyderabad-500062
...Petitioner/Petitioner/
Plaintiff
AND
tVtohd. Zameer Ahmed, S/o Late tVlohd. Saleem Ahmed Governmet Service Acharya Ranga Agril. University Health Centre Rajendra Nagar, Hyderabad, R/o. H.No. 4-7-1Ol21lC, Plot No. 2, Raghavendra Nagar RespondenURespondenU
Defendant
l.A. NO: 1OF 2012 (CRP.MP. NO:401 oF 20121
affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to permit the GPA Holder of the Petitioner Viz., lttirza Jalaluddin to prosecute the case on behalf of the petitioner Nilopher.
CONTEMPT CA{}E NO: 344 OF 2011
Contempt Case under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 to punish the respc ndent herein for the willful and deliberate disobedience of the order dated 03.10.2010 passed in CRP No.3408 of 2010.
Between
t\4. Neelopher, \A//o tMohd. Zameer Ahmed, Aged 25 years, Occ. House-hold, R/o Plot No. 2250, Saibatra Nagar, ECIL Post, Hyderabad-500062.
Petitioner
AND
lVlohd. Zameer r\hmed, S/o Late ltlohd. Saleem Ahnred, R/o H.No.4-7-1Ol21lC, Plot No. 2, Raghaverdra Nagar, Nacharam, Hyderabad.
Respon d enUContem ptnor
l.A. NO: 1 OF 2(t11(APPL. NO: 587 OF 2011
Between
lVlohd. Zameer Ahmed, S/o tt/ohd Saleem Ahmed, aged about 33 years, Occ: Employee, R/o. H.No.1O-7-11126, Raghavendra Nagar, Nacharam, Hyderabad.
...Petitioner/Respondent
AND
Neelopher, Wo lMohd Zameer Ahmed, Aged 25 years, Occ: House-hold, R/o Plot No 2250, Saibaba flagar, Hyderabad.
...RespondenUPetitioner
affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to recall the non bailable warrant issued against the Petitioner on dated 12-07-2011 in C.C.N o.34412011.
l.A. NO: 1OF 2025
Between
Smt. Neelopher, Wo lVohd Zameer Ahmed, and D/o.tvlirza Jalaluddin, aged 40 years, Occ: House hold, R/o. Plot No.2250, Saib baba Nagar, Sai Baba Nagar, Dammigadda, KaPra' RR District
..Petitioner
AND
1. tMohd. Zameer Ahmed, S/o tMohd Saleem Ahmed, Aged about 45 years, Occ:
Employee Agriculture College, R/o.Plot No.2, H.No.4-7-10121lC, Raghavendra Nagar, Nacharam, Hyderabad.
2. The Registrar, CE.Ch.Vidyasagar, Professor Jai Shanker Agriculture University, Rajendranagar, Hyderabad, Telangana- 500030.
...ResPondents
affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to enhance the maintenance amount from Rs.2,500/- to Rs.40,000/- accordingly to the present standard of living condition as well as by considering the present position of petitioners living condition in contempt case No. 344 of 2011.
Counset for the Petitioner in both cases: None appeared Counsel.for the Respondent in both cases: Sri Mohd Mumtaz Pasha The Court made the following : COMMON ORDER
?('
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN
AND
Tti.E HON'BLE JUSTICE B.R.MADHUSUDHAN RAO
OF
M.Neelopher
Mohd. Zameer Ahmed
C.C.N
EMPT CASE NO
oF 201r
.o2.2026
... Petitioner / Petitioner / Plaintiff
Vs.
Respondent /Respondent /Defendant
AND CO
D
In C.R.P.N
408 of20I0:
Neelopher
Petitioner
Vs.
Mohd. Zamee'r Ahmed
... Respondent /Contemptnor
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
COMMON ORDER
(per the Hon'ble Sri Justice K.LAKSHMA|\i) None appears for the petitioner.
2. We have heard Sri Mohd Mumtaz Pasha, learned counsel for the respondent.
3. Petitioner/wife filed a petition under Section 7 of the Family Court Act read with Section 34(C) of the Specific Relief Act vide O.P.NO.432 of 2009 against the respondent/husband to declare the moves of the respondent in rnaking preparations to contract for second marriage during the subsistence of his first marriage. She has also frled an interlocutory application vide I.A.No.702 of 2009 in O.P.No .432 of 2009 seeking interim injunction against respondent not to enter a contract lor second rnarriage.
4. This revision is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of tndia challenging the order dated 30.07.2010. But she has not filed copy of the said order. She has filed a wire order and perusal of the said order would reveal that this Court vide order dated 12.11.2009 in CRP (SR) No.30657 of 2009 in CRP (SR).No.30655 of 2009 filed by the petitioner herein granted interim injunction restraining the respondent from contracting second marriage, pending disposal of O.P.NO.432 of 2009
5. Vide order dated 03.08.2010, this Court restrained the respondent from contracting second marriage for a period of six weeks. The same was extended till next date of hearing on 15.09.2010. It was vacated on 10.12.2010. Thereafter vide order dated 31.12.2010 this Court granted interim injunction.
- ! 201 | To,
6. According to the petitioner, respondent violated the said order and contracted set;ond marriage on 23.12.2010. Thus according to the petitioner, respondent riolated the aforesaid order granted by this Court dated 03.08.2010 ir CR-P.MP.No.4546 of 2010 in CRP.No.3408 of 2010 w.illfully and deliberat,:lv. Therefore, she has filed contempt base in C.C.No.3 44 of
Sri Mtlhd Mumtaz Pasha, leamed counsel for the respondent orr instructions rvould submit that Family Court dismissed tlie said O.p. in the year 201 6 itst:lf .
8. [n the light of the same, nothing survives in the present Civil Revisiop Petition to e"djudicate further. Therefore, this Civil Revision petition is dismissed.
9. [n vievv of dismissal of the said CRP, Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no ol'der as to costs. As a st:qtrel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. SD/. P.CH.NAGABHUSHAMBA DEPUTY REGISTRAR /TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
1. The JuCge, Family Court, Secunderabad.
2. One Ctl to Ms. M.Neetopher [pARTy-lN_PERSON]
3. one c(l to SRr tMoHD MUMTAZ PASHA, Advocate topucl
4. Two CI) Copies Ba/psl 1@,
I HIGH COURT DATED: 0310212026 COMMON CIRDER CIVIL REVlsilON PETITION NO: 3408 OF 2010 AND CONTEMPT CASE NO: 344 OF 2011 DISMISSING THE CIVIL REVISION PETITION AND CLOSING THE CONTEMPT CASE KS l zaf-l,e THE S a ? rlrQ l/fili z * *