WP/5856/2010 of M/S A.V.ALLOYS LTD Vs THE GOVT OF A.P AND ANOTHER on 2 February 2026

13447 |

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

MONDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF FEBRUARY

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENW SIX

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAIU KOSHY

AND

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA

WRIT PETITION NO: 5856 OF 2010

Between:

M/s.A.V.Alloys Ltd, Rep.by its Managing Director Mr Vikram.Daga Rege under the Companies Act 1956) Regd Office Sy NO 355/A,Nandigaon (Vill) Patancheru(M), Medak District.

...PETITIONER

AND

1. The Govemment of A.P, rep.by Secretary Department of Panchayat Raj Secretariat, Hyderabad

2. The Executive Officer, Gram Panchayat, Nandigama(V) Patancheru(M)

Medak District-502300

...RESPONDENTS

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents herein in seeking to recover house tax of Rs 2,81 ,4271- trom the petitioner a.s illegal,arbitrary and unconstitutional and consequently set aside the procbedings of the 2nd respondent bearing No 1552-tl dt 18-1-2010.

I

I

I

I

i

i

/,/

l.A. NO: 'l OF 2010(WPMP. NO: 7554 OF 2010)

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the ci cumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court rn ry be pleased stay of all further proceedings pursuant to the proceedings of the 2r I respondent bearing No 1552 -11 dt18-12-2010.

Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI VAROHINENI KRISHNAMO {AN

Counsel for the Respondent No.1 : GP FOR PANCHAYAT t AJ & RURAL DEV

Counsel for Respondents No.2 :SRl K.PRADEEP REDDY, S C FOR Gp,Mp,Zp The Court made the following: ORDER

I

t

TIIE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM KOSHY

AND

THE TIONOT]RABLE SRI JUSTICE NARSING RAO

NANDIKONDA

W.P.No. s856 0F 2010

02.02.2026

Between:

tWs A.V.Alloys Limited,

Rep. by its Managing Director,

Mr. Vikram Daga.

..Petitioner

AND

The Govememnt of A.P.,

Rep. by Secretary, Department of Panchayat Raj, Secretariat, HYderabad and another

..Respondents

ORDER, (per Hon'ble Sri Justice P'Sam Koshy)

Ms. Roohi Nabeela, leamed Assistant Govemment Pleader for Panchayat Raj and Rural Development Department for respondent No. l.

2.

For the last couple of dates of hearing, there has been no representation on behalf of the petitioner either by the counsel engaged or by the petitioner-in-person '

(

t

2

3.

Considering the fact that the writ petition i ; of the year 2010, it appears that the petitioner must have lost nterest in the litigation. [n vierv of the same, the Bench is left .r i1h no option, but to dismiss the writ petition for want of prosecut r rL.

4.

The u'rit petition is, accordingly, dismiss: I for want of prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs Consequently. miscellaneous petitions pendin;, if any, shall stand closed //TRUE COPY//

ST) .P.C.SULEKHA DEVI

ASS STANT REGISTRAR

(5'

SECTION OFFICER

To,

1. One CC to SRI VARDHINENI KRISHNAIVOHAN, Advcr rte. [OPUC]

2. Two CCs to GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ & RURAL DE v High Court for the State of Telangana. [OUT]

3. One CC to SC FOR TG-MPPS GPPS, Advocate. [OPL( ]

4. Two CD Copies.

I

\

BSK J

f,rq

HIGH COURT

DATED:0210212026