Telangana High Court
AS/137/2006 of Siaban Sab Vs G. Narayana Reddy on 2 February 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD IVONDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUDDALA CHALAPATHI RAO APPEAL SUIT NO: 137 OF 2OOG Appeal Under Section 96 R/w Order 41 Rule '1 of C.P.C. against the Decree and Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
IVONDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF FEBRUARY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUDDALA CHALAPATHI RAO
APPEAL SUIT NO: 137 OF 2OOG
Appeal Under Section 96 R/w Order 41 Rule '1 of C.P.C. against the Decree and Judgment dated 23-09-2005 in O.P.No. 45 of 2003 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge, Wanaparthy, Mahabubnagar.
Between:
1. Siaban Sab, sio Hussain, (DIED) per LRs. Applts. 2 & 3.
2. Pinjari Shali Sab, S/o Pinjari Saiban Sab, aged 41 yrs,
3. Pinjari Chinna Shali Sab, S/o Pinjari Saiban Sab, aged 38 yrs, Occupatio of both is Agriculture, R/o Chinnamroor Village, Veepanagandla Mandal, lvtahabubnagar Dist.
...Respondents No.5, 24 & 25lAppellants
AND
1. G. Narayana Reddy, DIED.
2. G Narsimha Reddy, Sio G. Narayana Reddy, aged 40 yrs, R/o Chinnamaroor
(V), Veepanagandla Mandal, ltrlahabubnagar Dist
3. G. Chandrasekhara ReddY, DIED.
4. G. Raghava Reddy, S/o G Narayana Reddy R/o Chinnamaroor f''/), Veepanagandla lvlandal, Mahabubnagar Dist.
5. G. Krishna Reddy, S/o G. Narayana Reddy R/o Chinnamaroor (V), Veepanagandla Mandal, Mahabubnagar Dist.
6. G. Rajeshwar Reddy, S/o G. Narayana Reddy R/o Chinnamaroor (V), Veepanagandla Mandal, Mahabubnagar Dist.
7. G. Pullamma, DIED.
S.G.Lakshmidevamma,WoMohankumarReddy,aged2Tyrs,R/oVardiyala Locality of Kollapur, Kollapur Mandal' Mahabubnagar Dist
9. G. Padmamma, W/o G. Narayan Reddy, aged major Rio Janumpally Village, Kollapur Mandal, Mahabubnagar Dist.
10. G. Shakunthalamma, Wo G. Chandrasekhar Reddy, aged 50 yrs, '1 1. G. Tirumaleshwar Reddy, S/o G Chandrasekhar Reddy, aged 30 yrs, -r-
12. G. Amaravas Reddy, S/o G. Chandrasekhar Reddy, a1>'1 20 yrs, No.'10 to 12
are R/o Chinnamaroor (V), Veepanagandla Mandal, Mar rbubnagar Dist.
...Responcr nts 1,15-22,33 to 35
13 Bakku Khan, S/o [\4ohd. Naseeb Khan, aged 48 yr:; R/o H.No. l7-9-125, Kurmaguda, Hyderabad
14. l\AD. Nazeer Khan s/o [Vliyya khan
15. IVD. Bahadur Khan s/o ttliyya khan
16. Zainab Khatoon. w/o Mahabub Khan, R/o Kurnool
17. Mohd. Ali Khan, s/o Talamoon Khan
18. Hasad Khan, s/o Talamoon Khan
19. Moinuddin Khan, s/o not known
20. Gulam Gouse Khan, s/o fi/ahabub Khan 2'1 . Doulath Khan. s/o Mahabub Khan
22. Hyder Ali Khan, s/o lr4ahabub Khan
23. Nazeer Ali Khan, s/o Mahabub Khan
24. Diskict Collector,, Mahabubnagara Dist. at Mahabubnag lr
25. Bwan Khatoon, w/o Savai Khan, (died)
26. lvlurad Khatoon, w/o Savai Khan,65 yrs
27. Sarvar Ali Khan, w/o Savai Khan, 50 yrs
28. Zalrcd AIi Khan, w/o Savai Khan, 45 yrs
29. Ziauddin Ali Khan, w/o Sarvai Khan,42yrs
30. Mahtab Khatoon, D/o Sarvai Khan,30 yrs
31. Jeevan Khatoon. D/o Sarvai Khan, 20 yrs
32. Kareem Khatoon, w/o Mohd. Osman Khan,40yrs, 33, The LA Officer & Spl Dy.Collector (LA) ll., Srisailam Pr: e,ct, Kollapur Mandal, Mahabubnagar Dist
...Respondents 2 to 4, 6 to '14,23,26 to 32 & Pe I tioner/Respondents (Respondent No.13 to 33 are not necessary parties since no rr) ef is granted in their favour and hence no notice is necessary being proforma parti(): in appeal)
I.A. No. 2 oF 2006 ASMP. No.511 OF 2006
Petition under Section 151 of CPC praying that in the cir lumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may I er pleased to stay the operation of the decree dt: 23-9-2005 in O.P.No.45 of 2003 or he file of the Court of Senior Civil Judge, Wanaparthy, lt/ahabubnagar Dist., pendirrr final disposal of the main aPPeal.
I
Counsel for the Appellants: SRI K MAHIPATHI RAO, NO REPRESENTATION
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.6, 8to 12: SRI M DAMODAR REDDY
The Court made the following: JUDGMENT
l-
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TEI ANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUDDALA CHAL,I PATHI RAO
APPEAL SUIT No.t37 OF 2006
DATED: O2.02.2026
Between:
Saiban Sab and 2 others
..,, rppellants
AND
Gireddy Narayat.ra lledrl,y and 32 others
... F! rspondents
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
JUDGMENT
Despite the m:tt[er being listed under the :zrption ,for dismissal' toda1, Lher-e is no representation on b: .ralf of the on ,. Cr. IO.2O2S, appellants. Even on carlier occasions i.e.. 25.11.2025. l5 12.;202,\, O6.O1.2026 anC 29.Ol.2O2rr there was no represelttation on behail of the zrppellants. It at p,ears that the appellar-rts are not having anv inclination to pro recute this case, as such, this Court has no other option excep _ to dismiss the Appeal Suit for non -prosecil tion.
2. Accordingly, the Appeal Suit stantcls dismissed lor non, prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs As a sequel, per-rding miscellaleous applic:rtions, if an-r,, shall stand closed SD/. N.SRIHARI DEPUTY REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER Z (>' //TRUE COPY// '1 . The Senior Crvil Judge, Wanaparthy, Mahabubnagar
2. One CC to Sri K Mahipathi Rao, Advocate [OPUC]
3. One CC to Sri [\il Damodar Reddy, Advocate [OPUC]
4. Two CD Copies ABK lPSI To, ,fr,
I HIGH COURT DATED: 0210212026
JUDGMENT
AS.No.137 of 2006 DISMISSING THE APPEAL SUIT FOR NON-PROSECUTIOII WITHOUT COSTS riSr ot J
? ,.8 .)
-2. * : :ATC
.1, \'), 1L I