Telangana High Court

WP/37447/2013 of The Secunderabad Cantonment Board, Vs The Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, on 2 February 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF FEBR.UARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUDDALA CHALAPATHI RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 37447 OF 2013 Between: The Secunderabad Cantonment Board, Rep.by its

[ 3485 I

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

MONDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF FEBR.UARY

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUDDALA CHALAPATHI RAO

WRIT PETITION NO: 37447 OF 2013

Between:

The Secunderabad Cantonment Board, Rep.by its Chief Executive Officer, City Civil Court Compound, S.P.Road, Secunderabad-s00 003.

.....PETITIONER

AND

1. The Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, Rep.by its Commissioner, Office at Near Tank Bund, Hyderabad.

2. The Deputy Commissioner, Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, Kukatpally Circle No.14, Office at Janathanagar, Kukatpally Municipal Office, Hyderabad.

3. The District Collector, Ranga Reddy District, Off at Masab Tank, Hyderabad.

4. The Tahsildar, Balanagar Mandal, Balanagar, Ranga Reddy District at Hyderabad

5. S.Gnaneswar Rao, S/o S.Maisaiah, Aged about 46 years, Occ Employee, R/o H.No.9-2-471213, Hasmathpet Village, Balanagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District.

6. S.Pararneswar Rao Died (As per LR's vide separate sheet), S/o Maisaiah, Aged about 44 years, Occ Employee, Rl/o H.No.9-2-471213, Hasmathpet Village, Balanagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District.

7. Smt S. Bhargavi, Wo Late S. Parameswara Rao Aged about 50 years, Occ Housewife

8. Sreram Revika, D/o Late S. Parameswara Rao Aged about 27 yrears, Occ Student

9. S. Vyshnavi, D/o Late S. Parameswara Rao, Aged about 241ears, Occ Student

10.S. Sree Ram Chaithanya Prasad Rao, @ S. Sree Ram Chaithanya Prasad S/o Late S. Paranreswara Rao, Aged about 22years. Respondents No. 7 to .10 are legal heirs of the (Respondent No. 6 they are the residents of H.No. 9- ?-!-;l?, Sree Rama Ambika Nilayhm Hasmathpet, Bowenpally, Secunderabad 500 009)

(Rerspondent Nos. 7 to 10 are brought on record as LRs of the deceased Respondent No.6 as per court order dated 12.1o.202s in l.A.No.1 of 202s).

.....RESPONDENTS

Petition Under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstarrces stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or direction and more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the sanction of Building Permit No.17241140lHOlCir14l2O10 vide file No.277lCSCffP-14MZ12O1O dated 11.04.201'l issued by the Respondents No.1 and 2 in favour of the Respondents No.S and 6 as illegal, arbitrary, erroneous and against the Provisions of the Greater Hrlderabad Municipal Corporation 4ct 1955 and consequently set aside the Building Permit No. 1724lHOMZlCir-1412010 vide file No.277lCSC/Tp1 4MZl 2010 dated 11.04.2O11 issued by the Respondents No.1 and 2 in favour of the Respondents No.5 and 6.

|.A.NO:1 OF 2013 (WPMP.NO: 46596 OF 2013)

Petition Uunder Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pteased to suspend tle operation of the Building Permit No. 1724lHOMZCir-14t2010 vide file No.277|CSC/TP-14MZl 2010 dated 11.04.2011 issued by Respondents No.1

and 2 by directing the Respondents No.S and 6 not to proceeding with further constructiorl pursuant to the above building permit dated 11.04.2011 pending disposal of the above writ petition.

Counselfor the Petitioner : SRI K.R.KOTESWARA RAO

Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 & 2 : SRt RAVI MAHENDER

Counsel for the Respondent Nos.3 & 4 : GP FOR REVENUE

Counsel for the Respondent Nos.S & 6 : SRI MAHMOOD ALI

Cotrnsel for the Respondent Nos.7 to 10 : - The Court made the following ORDER

\t

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT

HYDERABAD

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE SUDDALA CHALAPATHI RAO

trI.P.No.3 7447 of 2O13

Dt.o2.O2.20.26.

Between:

The Secunderabad Cantonment Board

and

......Petitioner

The Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation and nine others.

.......Respondents

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER:

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Ravi Mahender, learned standing counsel for GHMC appearing for respondent Nos. I &,2 and perused the record'

2. The present Writ Petition has been Iiled to issue a Writ of Mandamus declaring the sanction of Building Permit No.tT24lHOlwzlcir-r|l2olo uide File No.277 /CSC/TP- L4/WZ12O1O, dt.l1 .O4.2O11, issued by respondents No.1 & 2 in favour of respondent Nos.S & 6 as illegal, arbitrary, elToneous and against the provisions of Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Act, 1955 (for short the GHMC Act') and consequent set aside the said built permit, dt' 1 1 'O4 '2OLl ' II \)

3. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel appearing for respondent Nos.1 & 2 contend that the grievance of the petitioner in the present writ petition does not survive for consideration, in view of the fact that the building permission granted to respondent Nos.S & 6 uide permit, dt.11 .O4.2O11, has already been revoked, which was subsequently challenged by the unofficial respondents vide a separate writ petition before this Court.

4. In thlt vierv of the matter, the griev€rnce of the petitioner in the presenl. Writ Petition stands redressed.

5. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is closed. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand close:d. .s.GOWRI SHANKAR /ffRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER s to G.P FOR REVENUE' High Court for of Telangana at SD'.A.H /l To 1. Twl CC' Hytlerabad One CC to dni'ffi mffi Fimggiiir*'loPucl

2.3. One CC to

4. One CC to

5. Two SAA( CD CoPies

HIGH COURT DATEtt:0210212026

ORDER

WP.No.37447 ot 2013 CLOSING THE W.P WITHOUT COSTS. 3,- ui7+i[ ,(_ st \?t ?sli ,Do iliJ rl '' ' '':

* *^ r'e Xff b

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead