TREVC/188/2009 of M/S.JITHENDER CORPORATION Vs THE SALES TAX APPELLANTE TRIBUNAL on 29 January 2026

134471

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD

THURSDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF JANUARY

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM KOSHY

AND

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA

TAX REVISION CASE NO:188 OF 2009

Tax Revision case under section 22( r ) of the Andhra pradesh Generar sares Tax Act, 1957, against the order dated 01.05.2009 in T.A.No.1857 of 2oo4 on the file of the Sales Tax Appelate Tribunar, Andhra pradesh, Hyderabad for the Assessment year 1998-99 (APGST)

Between:

It//s. Jithender Corporation, under Bridge Road, Warangal, rep by its proprielor Omprakash Mundada.

...Petitioner/Appellant

State of Andhra Pradesh represented by the state Representative before the Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal, Andhra pradesh, Hyderabad.

...RespondenU Respondent

AND

Counsel for the Petitioner : Mr. Suri Babu counsel for the Respondent: Ms. swaroopa oorila Speciar Government preader The Court made the following: ORDER

IN THE HIGH COTIRT FoR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT

HYDERABAI)

TIIE HONOTIILABLT] SRT JTJSTICE P.SAM KoSHY

ANI)

THE HONOT RABLE SItI J[ISTICE NARSINC RAO NANI)IKONDA

-I'REVC No.l88 of 2009

Datc:29.01.2026

Between:

M/s.Jithendcr Corporation.

Waranga[.

Pctiticner

And

State of Andhra Pradesh rep.by its

State Rcpresentativc belorc the Salcs'[ax Appellate l'ribuna[, Andhra ['radesh. I Iydcrabad I{espondenls ORDER, (per llon hle .\ri ,lu.sr ice l' *tm Ko.shy)

Heard Mr.Suri Babu. leamed counsel lor the petitioner and Mr.Swaroop Oorilla, learned Special Govemment Pleader lor State Tax and perused the rccord

2.

[,earned counsel lbr the petitioner submits that since the tax liability in the instant case being too tneagre amount ol Rs.38.000/-. the petitioner does not intend to pursue the sarne after so longer period

3.

In view of the sarre, the TREVC stands disposed of as not pressed. The question ol liabitity agitated by the petitioner would I

z

To,

always remain open to be decided in an appropriate case' There shall be no order as to costs.

Consequently. miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed Sd/- A.V.S. PRASAD

DEPUTY REGIST

//TRUE COPY//

SECTION OFFICER

'1 . The Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal, Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad-

2. Two CCs to the Ms. Swaroopa oorilla special Government Pleader, High court for the State of Telangana. at Hyderabad (OUT)

3. One CC to Mr. Suri Babu Advocate [OPUC]

4. Two CD Copies

D

HIGH COURT

DATED: 2910112026