Telangana High Court
WP/21851/2025 of Atish Mahadeo Shelar Vs The Regional P.F. Commissioner, on 29 January 2026
THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA WRIT PETITION NO: 21851 OF 2025 Between: AND 1 Atish Mahadeo Shelar, S/o. Mahadeo
t 33001
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF JANUARY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA
WRIT PETITION NO: 21851 OF 2025
Between:
AND
Atish Mahadeo Shelar, S/o. Mahadeo Bhaskar Shelar, Aged about. 44 years, Occ.Business, No. 2124, Rachna 2, New Chikalwadi, Sleator Road, Mumbai- 400007
...PETITIONER
The Regional P.F. Commissioner,, Hyderabad, Bhavishyanidhi Bhawan, No.3-4-763, Barkatpura Chaman, Hyderabad -500027
Karvy Stock Broking Limited,, Karvy [\ilillennium, Plot No.31/P, Nanakramguda Financial District, Gachibowli, Hyderabad, Rangareddy, TG 500032
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, direction, or more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus or declaring the action of the Respondent No: 1 in issuing an impugned ordet Dt.2OlO7l2O25 in Grievance ID APHYD/E/2025126999 which was filed on 16lOGl2O25, rejecting the Petitioner's claim for transfer of his Provident Fund dues to his new employer as illegal, arbitrary, and contrary to the Employees' Provident Funds Act, 1952, the Employees' Provident Funds Scheme, 1952 and Article 14 and Article 3004 of the Constitution of lndia, 1 950 and consequentially direct the transfer of his PF Account, in the interest of justice.
lA NO: 1 OF 2025
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the c r umstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Cour may be pleased to suspend the lmpugned Order Dt.20/07/2025 issued by li :spondent No. 1 in Grievance I D APHYD/E/2 025126999.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI BOKARO LOKESHWAR RE I rDy Counsel forthe Respondent No.1: SRI S. SURENDER REDt y (SC FOR EPFO)
The Court made the following: ORDER
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA
WRIT PETITION No.21851 of 2025
Dated: 29.OL.2026
Between:
Sri Atish Mahadeo Shclar
.,.Petitioner
AND
The Regional P.F. Commisstoner,
H-vderabad, Bhavishyanidhi Bharvan N o. 3 4 76 3, Barkatpura Chaman, Hyderabad-SOOO27 & another.
, ..Respondents
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
Heard Sri Bokaro Lokeshwar Reddy, learned counsel for the petrtioner and Sri S. Surender Reddy, le zrrned Standing Counsel lor respondent No.1
2. The petitioner has filed the present w,rit petition seeking a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of respondent No.1 in issuing the impugned order dated 20.07.2025 in Grievance iD No. APHYD 1D12025126999, filed on 16.06.2025, rejecting the \ petitioner's claim for transfer of his Provident F-und dues to hts neu' I employer, as illegal, arbitrary and contrary to the provisions ol the \- Employees' Provident Funds Act, 1952, the Err >lo1,ees, proviclent Irur-rds Scherrte, 7952 and Articles 14 and 3OOA ( the Constitution of Ir-rdia, anc[ conscquently to direct transfer , f the petitioner,s Provirlenl Furrd account.
lin Toda1,, S Surender Reddy, learned SL:t Lding Counsel for on instructions, submitted :i at the provident respondent lr'o.1, Fund accoun' of the petitioner bearing No.Ap/I{ ,D/2ggo3 132617 has alrcad.r been transferred to pF Account No. Ml1/BANl2246035 l1O3 16 for an amount of is.2.92,23O1_ on C9.O1 .2026, and the same was inlormed to the p: itioner vide oflice c-mail dated 09.O1.2026. He, therefore, pra\r C that the u,rit petition may tre closed.
4. In view of the submission made by learned ltanding Counsei lor respondent No.1, no further orders are requirr 1to be passed in the present u,r'it petitlon.
5. Accordingi,v, the Writ petition is closed. No r, Ccr as to costs Miscclla:reous petitions, if any, pending in I ris Writ petitiolr, shall stand clc,sed. ) SDI P.PONNA KRISHNA ASI; STANT REGISTRAR \ \ ''-_.-.,s, //TRUE COPY// SEGTION OFFICER
To, One CC to Sri Bokaro Lokeshwar Reddy, Advocate [CF UC] I
2 One CC to Sri S. Surender Reddy (SC for EPFO) [OPUC]
3. Two CD Copies TJ
t I i HIGH COURT DATED:2910112026
ORDER
WP.No.21851 of 2025 CLOSING THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS -.4 r ( : t,.i. e Sl,rll o o * :B 2[2[ -'t^'i1
C) .! ./\ k €