Telangana High Court
WP/2023/2026 of Syed Akramulla Hussaini Vs The State of Telangana on 27 January 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENry SEVENTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENry StX ,,i. PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA WRIT PETITION NO:2023 OF 2026 Between: QVed Akramu]la Hussaini, S/o Syed
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE TWENry SEVENTH DAY OF JANUARY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENry StX
,,i.
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA
WRIT PETITION NO:2023 OF 2026
Between:
QVed Akramu]la Hussaini, S/o Syed Asadulla Hussaini, Aged about 52 years, Occupation. _ Representative General Secretary, Kickboiing Association of J9!-a.1011a, South Zone Kickboxing Association Generat Secietary, No. 1Z-9- 616/4, Chowni Nade Ali Baig, Yakutpura, Hyderabad - 500023.
AND
...PET|T|ONER
1. The State of Te_langana, Represented by its Principal Secretary, youth Advancement, Tourism and Culture Department, Secretariat, l-iyderabad -
500022.
2. The Sports Authority of Telangana State (SATG), Represented by its Vice Chairman and Managing Director, Lal Bahadur Stadium, Hydera6ad - 50OOO1 .
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the.
circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondent no.2 in not considering the Petitioners representation daled 31.12.2025, seeking inclusion of eligible athletes and officials affiliated to the Kickboxing Association of relangana for participation in the 2nd Edition of the Hon'ble Chief Ministers Cup 2025-26, as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles 14 and 21 of ,the Constitution of lndia and consequenfly direct the Reslondent no.2 to Consider Petitioners representation dated 31 .12.2025 and permit the eligible athletes affiliated to the petitioner Association to participate in all eligible Kickboxing events under the 2nd Edition of the Hon,ble Chief Minister's Cup 2025-26, including appropriate age groups, weight categories and both boys and girls categories.
/
lA NO: 1 OF 2026
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the c t the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court m a the respondent no.2 to Consider Petitioners representation (
permit the eligible athletes affiliated to the Petitioner Assor;i all eligible Kickboxing events under the 2nd Edition of the ll, Cup 2025-26, including appropriate age groups, weight cat:
and girls categories pending disposal of the above writ petitir )umstances stated in , be pleased to direct aled 31 .12.2025 and rtion to pa(icipate in n'ble Chief lvlinisters ;ories and both boys t.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI HASSAN HUSSAIN JUNAII)
Counsel for the Respondent No.l: GP FOR SPORTS
Counsel for the Respondent No.2: SC FOR SATG
The Court made the following: ORDER
t
\
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPANA
WRIT PETITION No.2O23 of 2026
27.OL.2026
Between:
Syed Akramulla Hussaini
. .. Petitioner
AND
'lhe Stale of Telangana,
Represented by irs Principal Secretary.
Youth Advancement, Tourism & Culture Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad and ano Lher
...Respondents
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
Heard Sri Hassan Hussain Junaidi, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Government pleader for Sports, appearing for respondent No.1 and iearned Standing Counsel for the Sports Authority of. Telangana State, appearing for respondent No.2. Perused the record.
2. The present writ petition is iiled complaining inaclion of the respondents in not considering the petitioner,s representation, dated 31.12.2025 and seeking appropriate directions, as reflected in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition.
3. During the course of hearing, the learned :ounsel for the respondents on instructions submitted, that t:: petitioner 1S required to submit his representation through th: online portal, and upon such submission, the same shall be considered in accordalce with 1aw
4. In view of the above submission, and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the writ petitic,r is disposed of granting libertl to the petitioner to submit hi s representation online in the prescribed manner and upon suctr r ubmission, the respondents are directed to consider and disposc of the same as expeditiously as possible, in accordance with lar,r,' Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in t.-r s Writ Petition, shall stand closed. To ) //TRUE coPY/{ ot' ;*"s*ffitl+stsrm*;ul
6. Two CD CoPies SDi. C.DEEPIKA lSTANTBEGISTRAR ,a. SECTI-ON OFFICER nd Culture r - 500022. ority of Telangana )l . toPUCl bf Telangana' at P o i i
CC TODAY HIGH COURT DATED:2710112026
ORDER
WP.No.2023 of 2026 \ .f l,.l x -,-' F i---., ' \\ _ l-. ^\-.\'
+rs: ,t ,F. \i I i I r-(d il- E DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS