Telangana High Court
CC/2156/2025 of Suleman. Bin Ali Yafai Vs Sri G. Rajnikanth Reddy on 23 January 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE TWENry THTRD DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY StX PRESENT THE HONOTJRABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2156 OF 202s Contempt Case filed Under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 to punish the
;
I
I
I
I
'
I
tiI
II
i
x
I
i
i
I
i
I ir66 ]
,\
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
FRIDAY, THE TWENry THTRD DAY OF JANUARY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY StX
PRESENT
THE HONOTJRABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2156 OF 202s
Contempt Case filed Under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 to punish the respondents herin violating and disobeying the directions of the High Court dated 27.02.2025 passed in W.P.No.5955 of 2O25.
Between:
Suleman Bin Ali Yafai S/o Late Ali Bin Omer Yafai, Aged about 30 years, Occ:
Business, R/o H. No.8 441212, Erragadda, Hyderabad-s0001 8, Telangana State Petitioner
AND
Sri G. Rajnikanth Reddy, Deputy Commissioner, GHMC, Circle No.19; Yousufguda, Hyderabad, Telangana State.
...Respondent
Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri. Shakera Banu (none appeared)
Counsel for the Respondenb: Sri. G Madhusudhan Reddy (sc For Ghmc Serilingampally And Secunderabad Zones And Head Office Cases)
The Court made the following: ORDER
v
I
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE IC LAKSHMAN
DATEt 234l-2026
!,
:
:
ll
lr
I.li
itt.
:
:
.1tl.
I
Between:
Mr. Suleman Bin Ali Yafai
Petitioner
Vs.
Mr. G. Rajnikanth Reddy,
Deputy Commissioner, GHMC,
Circle No. I 9,Yousufguda, Hyderabad.
Respondent
This Court made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER:
None appears for thepetitioner.
2. This Contempt Case is filed alleging willful and deliberate violation of order dated 27.02.2025 in W.P. No.5955 of 2025.
3. Vide the aforesaid order, this Court disposed of the writ petition directing respondent No.3 therein to consider the reprerientation dated 24.01.2025 and inspect the site and if the allegirtions made by the petitioner are found to be correct, he shall take action against respondent Nos.6 to 10 strictly in accordance with the procedure laid down in the GHMC Act, 1955 by putting the petitioner and respondent Nos.6 to 10 therein on notice and affording t t \ \
i ! 2 I them an opportunity of hearihg. He shall complete the said exercise within a period of four (04) weeks from the date of receipt of copy of said order.
4. The respondent herein filed counter contending that the unofficial respondents in the said writ petition approached this court and filed writ petitions separate ty vide w.p.Nos.3 2303, 32317, 32302 and 32309 of 2024, and the same were disposed of directing the respondent herein and another not to demolish the subject properry without following due procedure laid down under law. Even then, the petitioner did not file any rejoinder adverting to the same. In the light of the sarne, this court is of, the opinion that there is no violation, much less willful violation ofthe order under contempt.
5. Therefore, this Contempt Case is closed. In the circumstances of the casg ttrere shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in th" "oll SD'. L. LAKSHMI BABU DEPUW REG //TRUE COPY/' SECT]ON OFFICER To,
1. One CC to Sri Shakera Banu, Advocate IOPUCI
2. One CC to Sri G Madhusudhan Reddy (Sc For Ghmc Serilingampally And Secunderabad Zones And Head office cases) Advocate IoPUC]
3. Two CD Copies W {1. GNk/prL
/ / I HIGH COT.IRT DATED: 2310112026
ORDER
CC.No.2156 of 2025 CLOSING THE CONTEMPT CASE WITHOUT COSTS (s sfzlze .