Telangana High Court

CC/2312/2025 of Medikayala Koundinya Vs Prof. B. Vijayalaxmi on 23 January 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2312 OF 2025 Contempt Case filed Under Sections 10 to 12 of ContemPt of Courts Act, 1971 to punish the

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD

FRIDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF JANUARY

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2312 OF 2025

Contempt Case filed Under Sections 10 to 12 of ContemPt of Courts Act, 1971 to punish the respondents herein Willfully disobeying the Orders of the High Court dalet22lOBl2O25 passed in WP No.25070/2025.

Between:

Medikayala Koundinya, S/o. Medikayala Sunil Kumar, Aged about 26 years, Occ Student, R/o. H. No. Flat No.302,3rd Floor, Vamshee Enclave, Chandulal Bowli, Tirumalagiri, Hyderabad Telangana -500009.

...Petitioner/Petitioner

AND

Prof, B. Vijayalaxmi, Convenor TS LAWCET and PGLCET 2025, Admissions Online Counseling Center, Osmania University, Hyderabad, Telangana State

500007.

...RespondenURespondent

Counsel for the Petitioner : Ms. G. Sampada representing Sri. M V Raj Kumar Gabriel Counsel for the Respondent No. 1 : Sri. Malipeddi Srinivas Reddy (SC For Osmania Uni)

The Court made the following: ORDER

.,|

HON'BLE SRIJUSTICE K. LAKSH' IAN

CONTEMPT CASENo.23l2OF2lt 5

DATE:23-01-2026

Between:

Mr. Medikayala Koundinya

Vs.

Prof. B. Vijayalaxmi, Convener

TS LAWCET and PGCET 2025,

Admissions Online Counselling Centre,

Osmania University, Hyderabad.

. Respondent

This Court made the followins:

ORALORDER

This Contempt Case is fited alleging will, i and deliberate violation of order dated22.08.2025 in W.p. No.250 of 2025.

2. Ms. G. Sampada, leamed counsel represer t ng Mr. M.V: Raj Kumar Gabriel, Iearned counsel for the petitione- on instructions, would submit that the respondent has already comp :d with the order under Contempt, and the petitioner has got atlrr ssion in LL.B., Course.

3. Recording the aforesaid submission, this lontempt Case is closed. In the circumstances of the case, there shall be no order as to \

.. Petitioner

costs.

I

As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in the contempt case shall stand closed.

SD/- P. CH. NAGABHUSHAMBA

DEPUTY REGISTRAR

SECTION OFFICER

//TRUE COPY//

To,

1. One CC to Sri. M V Rai Kumar Gabriel, Advocate [OPUC]

2. One CC to Sri. Malipeddi Srinivas Reddy (SC For Osmania Uni) [OPUC]

3. Two CD Copies

DUPSL

tu,

I

HIGH COURT

DATED: 2310112026

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

CC.No.2312 o12O25 CLOSING THE CONTEMPT CASE KS zfzl>e . ;1oii,. ,F ::-- '1 \ .Jc() I 13l'. 2[7i z

* t Cr'^,cnT:

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead