Telangana High Court
CC/335/2025 of Peddapudi Uppari Laxmaiah Vs Sri P.Ramakrishna on 23 January 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY. THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN CONTEMPT CASE NO: 335 OF 2025 Contempt Case filed Under Sectrons '10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act. 1971 lo punish the
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
FRIDAY. THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF JANUARY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 335 OF 2025
Contempt Case filed Under Sectrons '10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act.
1971 lo punish the respondents herern willfully and deliberately disobeying of the orders of the High Court dated 11 7 2024 passed in W.P No 10148 of 2024.
Between:
Peddapudi Uppari Laxmaiah, S/o Peddapudi Uppari Chinnaiah, aged about 60
years, occ. agriculture R/o H.No. 9-13, Yedula village and Mandal, Wanaparthy District
...Petitioner/Petitioner
AND
'1 . Sri P-Ramakrishna, Tahsildar and Jornt Sub Registrar, Yedula li/andal, Wanaparthy District.
2. S.Srinivasulu, Tahsildar and Joint Sub-Registrar Gopalpet [Vlandal, Wanaparthy Drstnct.
...Respondents/Respondent Nos. 2 and 3
Counsel for the Petitioner
: Sri. G Jaya Reddy (Not Present)
Counsel for the Respondent No. 2 : Sri. GP for Revenue The Court made the following: ORDER
I{ON'BI,E SRI JUSTICE K. I,AKSHMAI\I
CONTEMPT CASE No.335 OF 2025
DATE: 23-01-2026
Betn'een
N4r. Pcddapudi Uppari Laxmaiah
I'c titionc r
Vs.
Mr. P. Ramakrish-na. Tahsildar & Joint Sub-Rcgistrar.
Yedula Mandal. Wanaparlhy District & anorher.
{cspondcnts
This Court nradc thc tbllorving
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
None appears for the petitioner. both durin-e pre-lu r rlr and post- lunch
2. I'his Contempt Case is filed alleging ivilltul ar I deliberaLc violationof order datcd 11.07.2024 in W.P. No. l0l4t'i ol': jl.{
3. Vide Lhe albresaid order, this Court disposcrl t,t' thc urit petition dirccting respondent Nos.2 and 3 therein to cor cinate [,ith each other, trace out the flles and fumish the certili: I copics of pahanies AS sought by the petitioner vlde his appl ( rl.ion datccl 09.01.2024, and complete the said exercisc wilhin a p: i,rd ol firur
(04) weeks I
n0n- compliance of the satd orcler. IIou,ever, respondent No.I herein has
4. 1'he petirioner trled the present conlempt alleging filed counter contenclinq that he has cornplied u ith the ordcr under contempt b1, furnishing certilled copies o1- pahanies as sor"rqht by the pctitioner. In proof ol the s,rme. hc has also liled copy o1 the endorscmcnt dated 20.08.2024. Perusal of rhe said cndorsement rvoulcl reveal that thc petitioner hcrcin lurs signecl on it stating that he
5. '- In the light ol thc above. the prcscut Contempt Case is closcd. In the circumstances o1- the case. there sliall be no ordcr as to costs As a sequel thcrclo, nrisccllaneous petitions. if an1,', pcnding in the contempt case shall stand closed SD/- L.LAKSHMI BABU DEP UTY REGISTR i/TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER
1. Two ccs to the Public Prosecutor, High court for the state of Telangana, at Hyderabad (OUT)
2. One CC to Sri. G Jaya Reddy, Advocate [OPUC]
3. Two CD CoPies t To, DI,iGV has received pahanics f,or thc vears nrcntionctl tlrcrcin. Thus, thc tespondents have alrcadv complicd .,r'ith the ordcr undcr colltempt.
HIGH COURT DATED: 2310112026
ORDER
CC.No.335 of 2025 CLOSING THE CONTEMPT CASE * I: 1 &\at dE
S