Telangana High Court
CC/2068/2025 of Pasham Shanthi @ Shantha, Vs Daggula Kranthi Kumar, on 23 January 2026
case fired Under sections 10 to 12 of contempt of courts Act, 1971 Rlw Article 2'15 of the constitution of lndia to punish the respondents herein ylg|g9s and disobeying the directions of the H(7h court dated 19.6.202s passed in W.P.No.16813 of 2025. IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF
[ 3{681
contempt case fired Under sections 10 to 12 of contempt of courts Act, 1971 Rlw Article 2'15 of the constitution of lndia to punish the respondents herein ylg|g9s and disobeying the directions of the H(7h court dated 19.6.202s passed in W.P.No.16813 of 2025.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
FRIDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF JANUARY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2068 0F 2025
Between:
AND
Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI SHATKH MOHAMMED RIZWAN AKHTAR
Counsel for the Respondents: SRI SRIDHAR BHUVANAGIRI, AGp For Home The Court made the following: ORDER
1. Pasham Shanthi @ Shantha,, D/o. pasham Sura Reddy, Aged 39 years, Occ; Agriculture, R/o. H.No.3-7Cl1, pagidimani Village, Kanagal Manda[ Na[onda District.
2. Pasham Pulamma, Wo. Raghava Reddy, Aged 6g years; Occ: House hold, R/o. H.No. 1-71, Narketpally Village and Mandal, Nalgonda District.
3- Pasham Navitha @ Bhuvaneshwari, @ Bhuvaneshwari Navitha, D/o. Late fasham Ramalinga Reddy, Aged 24 years, Occ: private Employee, R/o. plot No.10, Lecturers Colony, Near [\4edi lrlore Medical, Hayath Nagai Rangareddy District.
4. l(omati Reddy Madhavi, D/o. pasham Sura Reddy, Wo. Komati Reddy Rajendar Reddy, Aged 43 years, Occ: Household, R/o. plot No.170, Suyavamshi Colony, D.V.K. Road, Nalgonda Town and District.
5. Pasham Pushpalatha, wo. Linga Reddy, Aged 66 years, occ: l-rousehold, Rl/o.
H.No. 4-18, Narketpally Village and Mandal, Nalgonda District.
6. Pasham Linga Reddy, S/o. Venkat Ram Reddy, Aged 72 years, Occ:
Agriculture, R/o. H.No. 4-lB, Narketpally Village and Mandal, Nalgonda District.
...Petitionerc
Daggula Kranthi Kumar, Presently workrng as S.l. of poiice, Narketpally police Station, Nalgonda District with No. 2896.
...Respondent
INTHE TIIGII COURT FOR THE STATE OIT TB L A.NGANA
ATHYDERABAD
TI{E I{ON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K. LAKSHNI \N
CONTEMPT CASE No.2068 of 2025
DATE OF ORDER: 23-01.2026
Between:
Pasham Shanthi and five others.
Petitioners.
AND
Daggula Kranthi Kumar.
Respondent
This Court made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER:
Heard learned counsel for the petitioners a r d Mr.Sridhar Bhuvanagiri, leamed Assistant Government Pleader lor lome
2. This Contempt Case is filed alleging willlul r nd deliberate violation o[the orderdated19.06.2025 in W.P.No. 1681. ot2025.
3. Vide the aforesaid order dated 19.06.2025, this lotrrt directed respondent No.2 therein not to interfere with the :ivil disputes pending between the petitioners and respondent Nos.6 rncl 7 therein According to the petitioners, respondent herein inter [ :red with the z civil disputes between the petitioners and respondent Nos.6 and 7 on 15.01.2025.
4. Respondent filed counter specifically contending that he never interfered with the civil disputes between the petitioners and respondent Nos.6 and 7 in the writ petition. Respondent has also mentioned that there is a crime i.e., Crime No.240 of 2025 pending against petitioner No.6 and others. The lnvestigating Oflicer in the said crime is conducting investigation, strictly in accordance with law. Even then, there is no reply fiIed by the petitioneru to the said counter.
5. In the light of the same, this Contempt Case is closed. However, the lnvestigating Officer in Crime No.240 ol' 2025 shall conduct invastigation, strictly in accordance with law As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in the Contempt Case shall stand closed SD/- A.V.S.PRASAD ASSISTANT REGISTRA //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1, One CC to Sri Shaikh Mohammed Rizwan Akhtar, Advocate [OpUC]
2. Two CCs to GP For Home, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad [OUT]
3. Two CD Copies r\[]K /[,S[. &*
HIGH COURT DATED: 2310112026
ORDER
CC.No.2068 of 2O25 CLOSING THE CONTEMPT CASE KS z-lzl>-e . U (? C ? ;, L: ,.,-.\. Ll 'a 1i *.\.*').s.^ 'r.-'Jh ''tl ?016 c)z t -.\:
- - I I I )