CC/1988/2025 of Adimulapu Ramaswamy, Vs Smt. K. Hymavathi, I.A.S., on 23 January 2026

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD

FRIDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF JANUARY

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1988 OF 2025

Contempt Case filed Under Sections 10 lo 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 to punish the respondents herein violating and disobeying the directions of the High Court datedl9-09-2024 passed on W.P.No. 2717 ot 2024.

BETWEEN:

Adimulapu Ramaswamy, S/o. Sayanna, Age.67 years, Occ: Ex-Service Men, R/o.

Gatlanarsingapur village of Bheemadevarapalli Mandal, Now residing at R/o- H.No. 12-245, Kakatiya Colony, Huzurabad.

...Petitioner/writ Petitioner

ANO

1. Smt. K. Hymavathi, l.A.S., The District Collector, Siddipet District.

2. V. Ananth Reddy, Sio. Not known, The Tahsildar, Akkannapet Mandal, Siddipet District.

...Respondents/Respondent 2 & 4

l.A. No. 1OF 2025

Petition under Section 15 of CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant leave to petitioner to file against the present Contempt Petition against the 2nd Respondent.

Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri. Sushil Kumar Pandey Counsel for the Respondents: Gp For Assignment The Court made the following: ORDER

n

/

HON,BLE SRI JUSTICE K. LAKSHMI N

CONTEMPT CASE No.l9EE OF 2025

DATE:2341-2026

!]@:

Mr. Adimulapu Ramaswamy -

Petitioner

Vs

Mrs. K. Hymavathi, IAS,

District Collector, Siddipet & another

Respondents

This Court made the following

ORALORDER:

Heard Mr. Sushil Kumar Pandey, [eamed r r unsel for the petitioner and leamed Assistant Government Plead : ior Revenue appearing for the respondents

2. This Contempt Case is filcd alleging willlul and deliberate violation of order dated 19.09.2024 in W.P. No.27l7 ol 1024.

3. Vide the aforesaid order, this Court dispos:d of the writ petition granting liberty to the petitioner to submit orl ne application in appropriate module of Dharani Portal along rv lr all relevant documents with respondent No.2 therein with a spec fic request to mutate his name and issue e-pattadar passbook, and rn filing such application, respondent No.2 therein shall consider tlx ;ame and pass

KIJ

CC No.l988 of m2s

appropriate orders strictly in accordance with law by putting the petitioner, respondent Nos.6 to 8 and l0 to 12 therein and all interested parties on notice and affording them an opportunity.

Respondent No.2 therein shall pass a reasoned order and communicate a copy of such order to the petitioner. He shall complete the entire exercise within eight (08) weeks from the date of receip of online application.

4. According to the petitioner, he has submitted fresh application on 30.09.2024. Even then, the respondent has not complied with the said order. Therefore, the present contempt is frled.

5. Whereas, respondent No.l has filed counter stating that in compliance with the order, she has issued notices, conducted inquiry and rejected the request made by the petitioner vide proceedings dated 19.11.2025. She has also filed copy of the said proceedings along with counter.

6. Learned Assistant Govemment Pleader for Assignment also would contend that the petitioner herein has already filed a writ petition vide W.P. No.40024 of 2025 challenging the said proceedings, and the said writ petition is pending

,ill

KI.J

CC No.l988 of2025

7. In the light of the above, the present Co tempt Case is closed. However, liberty is granted to the petitioner to take all the pleas and contentions which he has taken in the earlu r writ petition.

In the circumstances of the case, there shall be no orck r as to costs.

As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if r ny, pending in the contempt case shall stand closed.

SI) - L. LAKSHMI BABU

t

IEP TY REGISTRAR

/ffRUE COPY//

ECTION OFFICER

1. Two CCs to GP for Assignment, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad [OUT]

2. One CC to Sri Sushil Kumar Pandey, Advocate [OPUC

3. Two CD Copies

GNK/PSL

k

To,

tu,

\

'7

HIGH COURT

DATED: 2310112026