Telangana High Court
CRLP/429/2026 of Gade Innaiah alias Gade Inna Reddy Vs The State of Telangana on 22 January 2026
THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD PROCEEDING SHEET MAIN CASE: CRIMINAL APPEAL No.429 of 2026 Sl. No. DATE ORDER OFFICE NOTE 28.04.2026 SKS, J Crl.A.No.429 of 2026 Admit. List on 07.07.2026. In the meantime, the Registry is directed to call for records from the trial court and prepare paper
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
PROCEEDING SHEET
MAIN CASE: CRIMINAL APPEAL No.429 of 2026
Sl.
No.
DATE
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
OFFICE NOTE 28.04.2026 SKS, J Crl.A.No.429 of 2026
Admit.
List on 07.07.2026.
In the meantime, the Registry is directed to call for records from the trial court and prepare paper book and place before this Court. _______ SKS, J I.A.No.1 of 2026
This application is filed to suspend the execution of sentence passed in S.C.No.65 of 2020 by the learned Special Sessions Judge for Trial of SCs / STs (POA) Act Cases – cum – II Additional District & Sessions Judge at Nalgonda, pending disposal of the criminal appeal, wherein the trial court convicted the petitioner for the offence punishable under Section 3(1)(r)(s) of SC / ST (POA) Act and sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of six months and to pay a fine of Rs.1,000/- and in default of payment of fine amount, shall suffer simple Tr. to I.O. folder subject to correctio ns if any
imprisonment for a period of 15 days.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that though there is no evidence on record, the trial court erroneously convicted the petitioner. It is further submitted that there are good grounds to succeed in the appeal and the final hearing of the appeal may be taken considerable time. Therefore, he prayed the Court to allow this petition.
On the other hand, learned Additional Public Prosecutor opposed the bail petition contending that there is no illegality in the judgment of the trial court and that the trial court has rightly passed the impugned order and prayed this Court to dismiss the petition.
Perused the contents of the affidavit filed in support of the petition.
Having regard to the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, it is considered fit to suspend the sentence of imprisonment alone imposed against the petitioner till the disposal of the appeal.
Accordingly, the sentence of imprisonment alone is suspended till the disposal of the appeal and the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on the same terms and conditions as imposed by the trial court, pending disposal of the criminal appeal.
During the period of bail, the petitioner shall not indulge in any criminal acts, failing which, the respondent – State shall be at liberty to file a petition for cancellation of bail. _______ SKS, J Nsk