WP/1664/2026 of Bolagam Ashrith Vs The State of Telangana on 21 January 2026

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

(Speciat Originat Jurisdiction)

WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF JANUARY

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA

[ 3300 I

...PETITIONER

WRIT PETITION NO: 1664 OF 2026

Between:

Bolaqam Ashrith. S/o B Sri6jy6s. Aged about. 20 years, H.no.6_203, Bustand road, Pedda tinsapur, peddatinsapura. Gil;;;;;, 56d;d;, r etansa na

AND

The State of Telanoana. Rep. by.its principal Secretary, Department of Medicat Heatth and-Sciencei, it lingi; *?"["rn;:""

Kaloji Naravana Rao universitv of Heatth Sciences, warangar, The Chief Examiner. Kaloii \srsysns Rao University of Health Sciences, Warangal, Telangana.

The Principal, Prathima lnstitute of ,\,4edical Sciences, Nagunur, Karimnagar.

...RESPONDENTS

Petition under Articre 226 0f the constitution of rndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or drrection more particurarry one in rhe nature of Writ of l\r'landamus declaring the action of respondent no,s. 2 and 3 in not evaluating and issuing the papers of revaluation of the paper_l Human Anatomy as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutiona l, and violative of fundamental rights guaranteed under Articre 14 and 21 and vioration principres of naturar justice.

consequently, this Hon'bre court may direct the respondent no,s.2 and 3 to consider petitioner's apprication for recounting and the RTr Apprication seeking the Papers of revaluation.

lA NO: 1 OF 2026

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circr nstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court ray be pleased to direct the respondent no's.2 and 3 to consider the RTI Appl r ation submitted by petitioner and issue the Papers of revaluation.

Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI PONNAM MAHESH BABU

Counsel for the Respondent No.1 : GP FOR MEDICAL HEALI H FW

counsel for the Respondent No.2&3 , 3E,rt#fffiJX; Counsel for the Respondent No.4 :

The Court made the following: ORDER

INTHE HIGH COURT FORTHE STATE OFTELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA

WRIT PETITION No.l664 of 2026

2l't January,2026

Between:

Bolagam Ashrith S/o B. Snnrvas

Petitioner

AND

l. The State ofTelangana, represented by its Principal Secretary, Deparlrnent of Medical Health and Sciences, Telangana, and others.

... ILespondents

ORDBR:

The petitioner is a student of I year MBtsS, in Prathima lnstitute of Medical Sciences, Nagunur, Karimnagar District. under the Kaloj i Narayana Rao University of Health Sciences. He nrade an application dated 12.01 .2026 to the Pubtic Inlbrmation Officer ol-the University, stating that the marks he secured in Human Anatomy Paper-l of the Supplementary examinations in November 2025, did not reflect his actual performance, and therefore he requested to supply him a copy of his evaluated answer script lor verification. It is the grievance of the petitioner that his RTI application has not yet been considered, lor recounting of rnarks in the said paper.

I

2.

Heard Mr. Ponnam Mahesh Babu, learned counse I lbr the petitioner; and learned Govemment Pleader for Medical & Health, : td Mr. T. Sharath, leamed Standing Counsel for respondent-University.

3.

I-eamed counsel for the petitioner would submir hat the petitioner lailed in the Human Anatomy Paper-l by one mark. rnd theretbre the petitioner intended to veri! his evaluated answer scri| Leamed counsel submits that the w,rit petition is covercd by the ordcrs pr;sed by this Court in W.PNo.3 188 I o12025. dated 23.10.2025, which in trt n rvas disposed of based on the orders passed in W.P.No. I 2648 of 2025, dz t :d 24.04.2025.

4.

Leamed Standing Counsel would contend that as 1 er the Rules, there cannot be any re-evaluation of the answer scripts, hor', , \'er, the candidate can seek a copy olthe evaluated answer script tbrthe pu' ose of veri{lcation only. Leamed Standing Counsel does not dispute the :.r bmission that this mattcr is covercd by the orders inW.PNo.3l881 of 202i dated 23.10.2025.

5.

Having corrsidered the respective submissions an<l reruscd the record, and also the orders passed by this Court in W.P.No.ill8t ol 2025, dated 23 . I 0.202 5, the present writ petition stands d isposed of ir terurs of the orders passed by this Court in WP.No.12648 of 2025, dated l. .04.2025, r.r.ith the obsen'ation that as and when the petitioncr approa,r res the Cirievancc Committee by paying the requisite fees, the petitioner r,l all be permitted to vcrily his answer scripts. No costs. Miscellancous petit, ns pending, if any, shall stand closcd.

/

SI /-P. PONNA KRISHNA

ISTANT REGISTRAR

\A:5

\

To,

//TRUE COPY//

ECTION OFFICER

1. The Principal Secretary, Department of Medical He'al I and Sciences, Secretariat, Telangana.

The Registrar, Kaloji Narayana Rao University of Herl h Sciences, Warangal

Telangana.

3. The Chief Examiner, Kaloji Narayana Rao University t f Health Sciences, Warangal, Telangana.

4. The Principal, Prathima lnstitute of [\/edical Sciences, Nagunur, Karimnagar.

5 One CC to SRI PONNAN/ IVAHESH BABU, Advocate. [OPUC]

6. Two CCs to GP FOR tVEDICAL HEALTH FW, High Court for the State of Telangana. [OUT]

7. One CC to SRI T.SHARATH, SC for Kaloji Narayana Rao University of Health Sciences, Warangal. [OPUC]

8. Two CD Copies.

BSK

BS

HIGH COURT

DATED:21 10112026

!i

I€

SIA

Y\E

C)

L)

; $ JIN 2[t$

Z.

/