Telangana High Court

CC/913/2021 of R.Sudhakar and another Vs Prof. Battu Ramesh, Registrar on 20 January 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE K. SUJANA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 913 OF 2021 Contempt Case filed Under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD

TUESDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF JANUARY

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN

AND

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE K. SUJANA

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 913 OF 2021

Contempt Case filed Under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, .1 g71 to punish the respondents for their wilfully and deliberately disobedience of orders of the High court dated 0210612021 passed in writ Petition No 17717 of

Between

R-sudhakar, S/o R. Narasimha Chari, age about 59 years' Occ. lnstructor'

Deoartment of Dance, Potti Sriramulu Telugu University' Nampally'

Hyilerabad -5OO 004, Telangana State.

B.Rama Rao, S/o B. Narsingh Rao, age about 47 years, Occ Accompanist, Department of Dance, P-otti Sriramutu Telugu Unlversrty Nampally'

Hyderabad -500 004, Telangana State.

...PETITIONERS

AND

'l . Prof- Baftu Ramesh, Registrar, Potti Sriramulu Telugu University, Nampally, Hyderabad - 500 004, Telangana State.

2 Kotla Hanumantha Rao,, Registrar (present), Potti Snramulu Telugu University, Nampally, Hyderabad - 004.

(R2 is im'pieadeA ad peitfre Court Order dtd .10.O4 2025 in lA No 212O25 in CC No 913/2021).

3. Sandeep Kumar Sultania, lAS, Principal Secretary, Finance Dept', Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad.

4. Yogita Rana, lAS,, Principal Secretary, Higher Education Dept , Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad.

(nS and R4 impleaded as per the Court Order drd 22 08 2025 rn lA No 3 of 2025 in CC No.913 of 202'1).

...CONTEMNORS

Counsel for the Petitioners : Mr. Nambi Krishna representit g Sri. G Satyanarayana Yadav Counsel for the Respondent No. 1 & 2: Mr. Madiraju Sriniv: sa Rao Counsel for the Respondent No. 3: GP For ServicesJll The Court made the following: ORDER

r

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGAI{A

ATHYDERABAI)

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE IC LAKSHMAN

AI{D

THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE IC SUJANA

CONTEMPT CASE No.913 of 2021

DATE OF ORDER: 20.01.2026

Between:

R.Sudhakar and another.

Petitioners

AND

Prof.Battu Ramesh and 3 others.

Respondents

ORDER: (Per Hon'ble Sri Justice Kl,aksbon)

Mr.Madiraju Srinivasa Rao, learned counsel appearing for respondent Nos.l and 2, has produced appointment orders, both dated 12.01.2026 to cotnend that the respondents have already complied with the order under contempt and issucd proceedings to both the petitioners appointing their services as Assistant Lecturers (State Scale) in the Department ot'Dance, School of Fine Arts, Suravaram Pratapa Reddy Telugu li University, in the scale of pay of Rs.2750-596( with ,effect from 01.04.1998. Copies of the same are placed ct record.

2. Mr.Nambi Krishna, leamed counsel representing Mr.G.Satyanarayana Yadav, learned countrr I for the petitioners, also confirmed the said fact.

3. In the light of the same, the present Cont,mpt Case is closed. However, liberty is granted to the petitiol:rs to initiate fresh proceedings or file fresh contempt case, ir the event of violation of any part of the order under contemp' , As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous pet:l ons, if any, pending in the Contempt Case shall stand closed SD/- P. CFI. NAGABHUSHAMBA

t EPUTY REGISTRAR

..4.-

\/

//TRUE COPY//

SECTION OFFICER

1. One CC to Sri G Satyanarayana Yadav, Advocate [ )PUC]

2. One CC to Mr. tvladiraju Srinivasa Rao, Advocate [O ']UCl

3. One CC to GP For Services-lll,State of Telangana,Hycr rabad [OUT]

4. Two CD Coptes

To,

I

DUPSL

HIGH COURT

DATEO:2010112O26

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

CC.No.913 of 2021 CLOSING THE CONTEMPT CASE sra HE il t(l O r)- ../.. \n i f.i.A )t ) t'r..- r-r ti-P '!j"" 3/!ze JKs \:a *

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead