Telangana High Court
WP/37364/2025 of Shaik Basheer @ Basheed Vs The Union of India on 20 January 2026
rN rHE HrGH couRr tFtSl.IffI,$15 35,1".H[:f*o Ar HYDERABAD r u E s DAY,H,LHF$J' il,B ?'t"RI.i tl: ^*' PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA Between: :11'IrB1'ii7go?"J3io'nil:'J}ji:t"1no"' ('? 13?"i30'":""fi"11::'''ry0';':#3'
t 3300 I
rN rHE HrGH couRr tFtSl.IffI,$15 35,1".H[:f*o Ar HYDERABAD
r u E s DAY,H,LHF$J' il,B ?'t"RI.i tl: ^*'
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA
Between:
:11'IrB1'ii7go?"J3io'nil:'J}ji:t"1no"'
('? 13?"i30'":""fi"11::'''ry0';':#3'
ielangana State'
...PETITIONER
AND
1'l:?tstfl#:{lS$bli Rep' bv special secretary Ministry of corporate Affairs'
2 Elio,5rTo1tlild"1",?"#3,.H::
- s38J',
Hvderabad' corporate"
, -i.-
3stuffi i$*grr,";gl:8"?'fl '"'T??:f,
l:iRhl#:g'%1fi?l'?"*d'ts
4 Mrs. lrryarn a Ku m ali M
Y T*Rr:"#;, *6odn[3''o?:ln''tP'?l; l' /ffi'H8'
r'
ii.r.rb.o-g-596/70' Naveen
HYderabad'T's'
"'RE'P.NDENTS
petition under Articte 226 of the constitution of rndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith' the High court may be preased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, more particurarry one in the nature of writ of Mandamus, by declaring the action of the 2nd Respondent in not considering and disposing of the petitioners representations dated, 0210312025'
1gto7l2o25 by taking necessary action against the respondent' No' 3 and 4' as illegal, arbitrary, against the company rules, violative of Articles 14' 19 and 21 Of the Constitution of lndia, and against the principles of natural justice' and consequenfly to direct the 2nd respondent to consider and dispose of the Petitioners representations dated: O2|O3/2O25, 1glo7l2o25 by taking necessary action against the respondent. No. 3 and 4as per law.
IA NO: 1 OF 2025
'
Petition undersection 151 cPc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fileJ in support of the petition, the High court may be preased to direct the 2nd respondent to consider and dispose of the petitioner,s representations dated: o2lo3l2o25' 1glo7l2o2s bytaking necessary action against the respondent No' 3 and 4 as l)erlaw' forthwith' pending disposar of this writ petition before this Hon'ble Court.
COUNSEI fOr thE PEtitiONEr: Dr. CHALLA SRINIVASA REDDY
counser for the flespondents No.1 & 2: sRr ARVTND KUMAR KATA
SENtoR S.c. FoR cir.rinnr- covERNruerrrr Counsel for the Fiespondents No.3 & 4: -- The Court made the following: ORDER
/.
/
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESII BHEEMAPAKA
WRIT PETITION No. 37364 of 202s
Date
1.
Between:
Shaik Basheer Basheed
...Petitioner
AND
The Union of India & 3 others
...Respondents
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
This Writ petition is filed seeking to declare the action of respondent No.2 in not considering and disposing of the petitioner's representations dated O2.O3.2O25 and 19.O7.2025, and in failing to take necessary action against respondent Nos.3 and 4, as illegal, arbitrary, contrary to comp€Lny rules, violative of Articles L4, 19, and 2l of the Constitution of lndia, and against the principles of natural justice; and consequently, to direct respondent No.2 to consider and dispose of the said petitioner's representations by taking necessary action against respondent Nos.3 and 4 in accordance with law. \_
l
H':ard Sri Dr. chalra Srinivas Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Arvind Kumar Kata, learned senior standing counsel for Central Government, for respondent Nos.1 and,2.
3. Der;pite service respondents. of notice, none appeared for remaining 4' I-eat'ned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a lawful Dirr:ctor of M/s. progressive press pvt. Ltd. and that respondent Nos.3 and 4, who had earlier resigned from the company, have illegally and fraud,lently re-entered themserves as Directors by misusing the MCA ported and uproading forged documents without any board approval, c<lnsent, or compliance with raw. He submits that despite the petitioner srtbmitting representations dated 02.o3.2025 and 1g.o7.2025 to responde,t [,{o.2 along with supporting documents, and also lodging a police complaint regarding the fraud, no action has been taken by the authorities. I{e submits that the continued inaction of respondent No.2 has resultecl in the petitioner being unlawfully deprived of his directorship and control over the company, which is arbitrary, illegal, and contrary to the Companies Act, 2013 and constitutional principles, leaving the petitioner with no alternative remedy except to hpproach this Honble Court, He further prayed this Court to direct respondent No.2 to consider the pr:titioner's representations as expeditiously as possible. Learned zsenior standing counsel for central Government' for a f,. respondent Ncs.l and 2, submit that if the aforesaid petitioner,s rePresenta$ons be directed to accordance with law are still Pending for consideration consider the same and Pass , resPondent No'2 maY apProPriate orders in rate Bhavan'
6. Inviewofthesubmissionsmadebylearnedcounselappearingon eithersideandwithoutexpressinganyopiniononthemeritsofthecase, this writ petition is disposed of directing responderrt No'2 to consider the aforesaid petitioner,s representations, if pending' and pass appropriate orders in accordance with raw within a period of four (04) weeks from the dateofreceipt,ofacopyofthisorderandcommunicatethesametothe petitioner. No costs Miscellaneouspetitions'ifanypending' s'hall stand closed //TRUE COPY// OFFICER To H?* }rl,%?Tfl[, n:I ", ?"fr 3.113 3 - Lt33J'
2. One CC to Dr' CHALLA
3. One CC to SRI ARVIND [oPUC]
4. Two CD CoPies SRINIVASA REDDY , Advocate IOPUCI KUMAR KATA, Senior S'C' for Central Government il t t MP
HIGH COURT DATED :2OtO1t2O26 THE S t (J t- 2 7 rFI ?026 * t lT- RDER WP.No.37364 of 2O2S ISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS L D
*1 a a