CEA/193/2011 of VIRCHOW LABORATORIES LTD., Vs THE COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS AND CE on 19 January 2026

[ 348e ]

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD

I\4ONDAY,THE NINETEENTH DAY OF JANUARY

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM KOSHY

AND

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUDDALA CHALAPATHI RAO

CENTRAL EXCISE APPEALS NO

't 93 0F 201 1

Appeal is filed under Section 130 of Customs Act, 'l 962 against the order dated 17 OB2O11 passed by the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, South Zone Bench at Bangalore, in Final Order No 576

& 577t2011 in Appeal Nos E/1 124120OG & C/385/2008, preferred against the order dated 31 01 .2018 in Appeal No50/2007(H-ll) CUS Order-in- Appeal No. 4/200/ (H-ll) CUS on the file of the Commissioner Central Excise & Customs (Appeals), Hyderabad, preferred against the order dated 15.10.2007 order-in-original No S/47lRefundl12l2OO7-lCD, on the file of 'the Assistant Commissioner of Customs, lCD, Sanath Nagar, Hyderabad Between:

Virchow Laboratories LTD., Plot No.4, S.V. Coop. lndl- Estate, l.D A Jeedimetla Hyderabad-500 055

...AppellanUAPPellant

AND

The Commissioner Of Customs And CE, Hyderabad-ll Commissionerate nnyRXXnn BHAVAN, 7th Floor, L.B.Stadlum Road Basheerbagh, Hyderabad

...ResPondent

Counsel for the Appellant : Sri. Karthik Ramana Puttamreddy Counsel for the Respondent: Sri A Rama Krishna Reddy (SC FOR CBEC)

The Court made the following: ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TEI,, ,NGANA

AT HYDERABAD

THE HONOURABLE SRT JUSTICE P.SAM (OSHY

AND

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUDDALA CHAI APATHI RAO

Central Excise Appeal No. 193 of 20'.-

Date of Judsment : L9.Ot.2O26

BETWEEN:

Virchou, Laboratories Ltd.

..appellant

Vs.

The Commissioner of Customs & Central Excise , Respondent JUDGMENT | @er Hon'ble Sn Justice p.SA M KOSHI)

Heard both sides.

2.

when the m,tter is taken up for hearing, lear.r: rcounsel for the appellant conceded that the amciunt invoived in th r present appeal preferred by the appella,t is not a big amount r rther a meagre amount of Rs.59,014/ - which is claimed as int,: est on de layed pa),ment of interest from 02.OT.2004 to 30.06.20() , and therefore submitted that he would not press the appeal any furr I rer.

--::;.s-]

Page 2 ol2

t The Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, South Zone Bench at Bangalore.

2 The Commissioner Central Excise & Customs (Appeals), Hyderabad, 3 The Assistant Commissioner of Customs, lCD, Sanath Nagar'

Ayderabad.

4. One CC to Sri. Karthik Ramana Puttamreddy Advocate IOPUC]

5 One CC to Sri A Rama Krishna Reddy (SC FOR CBEC) [oPUCl

6. Two CD Copies

DL/PSL

\

3. In view of above submission of the learned counsel for the appellant, this Court is of the considered opinion that the instant appeal can be disposed ol as "not pressed". Accordinglv, the instant appeal stands disposed of as "not pressed". No costs.

4.

As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending if an1,, shall stand closed SD/. K. SRINIVASA RAO

JOINT REGISTRAR

//TRUE COPY//

SECTION OFFICER

To,

G

HIGH COURT

DATED:1 9/01/2026

I

gB

(

ATCHT-9