Telangana High Court

CRP/4373/2025 of Asif Yousuf Khan Vs H.E.H. The Nizam Awakaf Committee on 9 January 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM KOSHY CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 4373 OF 2025 Petrtion under Article 227 of Constitution of lndia aggrieved by the order dated 1t11t2O?3

t 3378 I

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD

FRIDAY,THE NINTH DAY OF JANUARY

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM KOSHY

CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 4373 OF 2025

Petrtion under Article 227 of Constitution of lndia aggrieved by the order dated 1t11t2O?3 passed tn O.S No. 422 ot 2016 (Old O S.No 62 o'f 2012) on the file of the Court of the Telangana State Waqf Tribunal at Hyderabad Between:

Asif Yousuf Khan, S/o. Alhaj Yousuf Khan, aged about. 53 years, Occ. Business, R/o. H. No. 9-8- 1 96/3, Bada Bazar . Golconda Fort, Hyderabad .Petitioner/2'd Defendant

AND

H.E.H. The Nizam Awakaf Committee, Rep. by its Secretary Syed Abdullah Quadri, S/o. Zainul Abedin Quadri, aged about 54 years, Occ: Secretary of Awqaf Committee, Office at King Koti behind Judr l\/osque, Hyderabad.

. RespondenUPlaintiff

2. Seeta Ram, (died)

3. Smt Ganga, Wo. Late Seeta Ram, aged about Major, Occ: Housewife, R/o.H.No 9-10-467/6, Golconda, Hyderabad.

(3rd Defendant has been Added as party as per Orders rn l.A. 1208/12 dated- 23-10-2013\

...Respondents/Defendants

lA NO:2 OF 2025

Petition under Section '1 51 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend Execution and Operation of the Decree and Judgment in O.S.No. 422 of 2016 (Old O.S.No 62 ot 2012) dated- 1-1 '1 2023 passed by the Telangana State Waqf Tribunal at Hyderabad including all further proceedrng in E-P No 329 of 2024 on the file of the Chief Judge, City Civil Court at Hyderabad pending disposal of Civil Revision Petition.

I

I

l

Counsel for the Petitioner : Sri Mohammed Aslam Counsel for the Rcspondents: Sri Syed Ali The Court made the following: ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM KOSHY

CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.4373 OJ 2025

DATE OF ORDER: O9.O1.2026

Between:

Asif Yousuf Khan, S/o. Alhaj Yousuf Khan, aged about : 53 Years, Occ: Business, R/o. H.No.9-B-196/3, Bada Bazal Golconda Fort, Hyderabad.

.Petitioner

AND

H. E. H. The Nizam Awakaf Committee,

Rep. by its Secretary Syed Abdutlah Quadri, S/o, Zainul Quadri, aged about 54 years, Occ: Secretary of Awqaf Committee, Office at King Koti behind ludi Mosque, Hyderabad and others.

...Respondents

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER:

Heard Mr. Mohammed Aslam, learned counsel for the petitioner; and Mr. Syed AIi, learned counsel for the respondents'

2. The instant Civrl Revision Petition under Article 227 of lhe Constitution of India has been flled by the petitioner challenging the judgment dated 07.11.2023, in O.S.No.422 of 2016 (old // ,,

O.S.No.62 of 2012), passed by the Telangana Stal Waqf Tribunal at H ydera bad

3. At the outset, this Court is of the opinion that Revision Petition is not maintainable as it is filed at stage of 2 years after the impugned judgment wa: Tribunal. Secondly, it is Found that the petitior r availed appropriate remedies flowing from the sat: decree by way of filing an E.A. before lhe Exe'c L E.A.No.522 of 2025, which stood dismissed on said order of the Execution Court has again gone Likewise, on inrtiation of execution proceedings, th: a Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constituti ) Writ Petition No.29041 of 2025, which too stoc( having become infructuous on 1O.12.2025. he instant Civil r much belated passed by the . had a ready judgment and .ion Cou rt i. e. .12.2025. The unchallenged. petitione r filed rof India viz., dismissed as

4. In the teeth of the aforesaid two proceeding. the reference of which is not reflected in the instant Civil Revis ( 1 Petition, the petitioner filed the instant Civil Revision Petition r rallenging the original judgment passed by the Tribunal I

5. Further, given the fact that there is a considerable delay on the part of the petitioner in approaching this Court and also given the fact that the petitioner meanwhile had availed other legal remedies available to him, and also considering the fact that no plausible explanation has been given by the petitioner for not assailing the impugned judgment passed by the Tribunal promptly and immediately, particularly when he was aware of the judgment having been passed by the Tribunal on 01.11.2023, it will be difficult for this Court to enterlain the instant Civil Revision Petition at th is juncture.

6. For the aforesaid reasons, this Civil Revision Petition fails and is accordingly rejected. However, the right of the petitioner for availing other legal remedies, if any, under the statute is Ieft open'

7. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending if any, shall Sd/- P.C. SULEKHA DE- SSISTANT REG AR SECTION OFFICER stand closed. However, there shall be no order as to costs. o T //TRUE COPY//

1. The Telangana State Waqf Tribunal at Hyderabad.

2. One CC to Sri [Vlohammed Aslam, Advocate IOPUC]

3. One CC to Sri Syed Ah, Advocate [OPUC] 4 Two CD Copies Sa/PSL _---{ ! I

HIGH COURT DATED:09/01/2026

ORDER

CRP.No.4373 ot 2025 REJECTING THE CRP sl.,l t6 I 2{12[ ::::!.t':' O ,( a. b ?h

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead