Telangana High Court
ITTA/340/2011 of AVANI FEEDS LTD Vs COMMISSIONER OF INCCOME TAX on 9 January 2026
COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENry SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM KOSHY AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUDDALA CHALAPATHI RAO INCOME TAX TRIBUNAL APPEAL NO: 340 OF 2011 (lncome Tax Tribunal Appeal under Section 260
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
FRIDAY,THE NINTH DAY OF JANUARY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENry SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM KOSHY
AND
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUDDALA CHALAPATHI RAO
INCOME TAX TRIBUNAL APPEAL NO: 340 OF 2011
(lncome Tax Tribunal Appeal under Section 260 A of the lncome Tax Act., '1961
against the order made in l.T.A.No.154/Hydl2O09 Dated 11.03.2011 on the file of the lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal, "8" Bench, Hyderabad preferred against the Order of the Commissioner of lncome Tax (Appeals)-1 1 , Hyderabad in lTA.No.0827/ClT(A)-1 1/06-07, Dated 28.11.2008 preferred against the Order of the Asst. Director of lncome Tax, Hyderabad made in PAN/GIR No.AABCA7365ElA-52
Dated 28.12.2006.
Between:
Avanti Feeds Ltd,, G-2, Concord Apartments, 6-3-658, Somajiguda, Hyderabad
...APPELLANT
AND
Commissioner of lncome Tax, Hyderabad-1, lT Towers, 10-2-3, AC Gourds, Hyderabad
...RESPONDENT
Counsel for the Appellant: SRl. M.V.RAMACHANDRA PRASAD
Counsel for the Respondent : SMT BOKARO SAPNA REDDY
(sENtoR sc tNcoME TAx)
The Court made the following: JUDGMENT
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR TEE STATE OF TELA}IGANA AT ]' )ERABAI)
TIIE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTTCE P.SAM KOSHT
A-I{D
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUDDALA CTIALAPAI HI RAO
ITTA No.340 of 2011
Date: 09.01.2026
Between:
Avanti Feeds Ltd., Hyderabad
Appellant
And
Commissioner of Income Tax, Hyderabad-I, Hyderabad.
JUDGMENT: (per Hon'bte Sri Justice p.Sam Koshy)
Jl .:spondents
Ms.B.Sapna Reddy, leamed Senior Standing Counsel for tht ncome Tax Department, for the respondent.
2.
None appears for the appellant, when the matter i: taken_up.
On the last occasion also, there is no representation on behalf of th r. appe ant.
Therefore, we directed the matter to be posted under the caption .for c smissal,.
3.
[n view of the same, this Bench is left with no other option br to dismiss the appeal for want ofprosecution.
4.
Accordingly, the Appeal stands dismissed for want of proser.r r.ion. There shall be no order as to costs.
Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed SD/- \.V.S. PRASAD
DEPIJ IY REGISTRAR
\
//TRUE COPYII
To,
SE( IION OFFICER
The lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal, ,.8,, Bench, Hyderabad The Commissioner of lncome Tax (Appeals)_i r', H'vl""rroro The Asst. Director of lncome Tax, Hyderabad- ' ' ' *- One CC to Sri tr/.V Ramachandra piasad, Advocate (OPUC, One CC to Smt Bokaro Sapna Reddy, S C for f ncomJ Tax D,) ,artment Advocate (OpUC)
Two CD Cooies
PSL
I
J
6.
Ks/
/t'
HIGH COURT
DATED:0910112026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
JUDGMENT
lTTA.No.340 of 2011 Dismissing the ITTA for Non Prosecution. Without costs. IE STA C) (.-) 1iltB 202t -4, I : 4\ -'
* t), 5; :;;r'r,
',J