Telangana High Court
WP/39746/2025 of Avula Jaganmohan Rao Vs The Telangana State Road Transport Corporation on 8 January 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA WRIT PETITION NO: 39746 0F 2025 Between: Avula Jaganmohan Rao, S/o. Avula Sambashiva Rao,
[ 3300 I
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF JANUARY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA
WRIT PETITION NO: 39746 0F 2025
Between:
Avula Jaganmohan Rao, S/o. Avula Sambashiva Rao, Age.74 years, Occ ; Retd Employee, RI/o. H.No.1-4-34211, Saraswathi Nagar, Bodhan, Nizamabad Diqtrict.
.....PETITIONER
AND
1. The Telangana State Road Transport Corporation, Musheerabad, Hyderabad, Rep. by its Chairman and tt/anaging Director.
2. The Chief Civil Engineer, The Telangana State Road Transport Corporation, ft/usheerabad, Hyderabad.
3. The Deputy Executive Engineer, The Telangana State Road Transport Corporation, Nizamabad, Nizamabad District.
4. The Regional [t/anager, The Telangana State Road Transport Corporation, Nizamabad, Nizamabad District.
5. The Depot l/anager, The Telangana State Road Transport Corporation, Bodhan Depot, Nizamabad District.
.....RESPONDENTS
Petition Under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstancesstatedintheaffidavitfiledtherewith,theHigh_Court@
pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in constructing the compound wall by closing the path way on the Southern side of the house of the petitioner which is existing since long time for ingress and outgress of his house bearing No. 1-4- 34211, in Sy. No.267 admeasuring 150 Square Yards, situated at Bodhan Tarfa Douthyal Shivar, near to Bus Depot of Bodhan Town, within the limits of Bodhan Municipality, Nizamabad District, though the said without issuing any notice to the petitioner and witl'rout following the due process of law, inspite of submitting the representations as illegal, arbitrary, abuse of process of law, violation of principles of natutral justice and consequently direct the respondents not to proceed with the construction of compound wall on the Southern- side of the petitioner house by closing the ingress and outgress of his house bearing No. 1-4- 34211, in Sy. No. 267 admeasuring 150 Square Yards, situated at Bodhan Tarfa Douthyal Shivar, ttear to Bus Depot of Bodhan Town, within the limits of Bodhan Municipality, Nizarnabad District in the interest of justice.
I.A.NO:1 OF 2025
Petition Under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the responrlents not to proceed with the construction of compound wall on the Southern side of the petitioner house by closing the ingress and outgress of his house bearing No. 1 -4-34211, in Sy. No. 267 admeasuring 150 Square Yards, situated at Bodhirn Tarfa Douthyal Shivar, near to Bus Depot of Bodhan Town, within the limits of Bodhan Municipality, Nizamabad District in the interest of justice pending disposal of the above writ petition.
Counsel for the lretitioner : SRl. S.SURENDER REDDY
Counsel for the lRespondents : SRI N.SUSHAMAN
The Gourt made the following ORDER
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAI(A
WRIT PETITION No.39746 of 2025
08.o L.2026
Between:
Avula Jagnmohan Rao
...Petitioner
AND
The Telangana State Road Transport Corporation, Musheerabad, represented by its Chairman &
Managing Director & 4 others
...Respondents
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
This writ petition is filed seeking for the following relief..... "to issue a Wit, Order or Direction, more particularlg a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in constructing the compound wall by closing the path waA on the Southern side of the house of the petitioner which is existing since long time for ingress and outgress of his house beanng ,lVo. 1-4-342/ 1, in Sy /Vo. 267 admeasuring 150 Square Yards, situated at Bodhan Tarfa Douthyal Shiua4 near to Bus Depot of Bodhan Town, within the limits of Bodhan Municipalitg, Nizamabad District, though the said without issuing ang notice to the petitioner and without following tle due process of law, inspite of submitting the representafions as illegal, arbitrary, abuse of process of law, uiolation of principles of nafiiral justice and consequentlg direct the respondents not to proceed with the construction of compound wall on the Southern side of tle petitioner house bg closing the ingress and outgress o/ his house bearing No. 1-4-342/1, in Sy. No. 267 admeasuring 150 Square Yards, situated at Bodhant Tarfa Douthyal Shiuar, near to Bus Depot of Bodhan Town, within the limits of Bodhan Municipality, Nizamabad District in the interest of justice". ) i !l J
2. Heard sri s.surender Reddy, learned counser for the petitioner arrd Sri N.Sushaman, learned counsel appearing for respondents. Perused the record. _3. Petitioner is claiming that he is the absolute owner and possessor of house bearing No. 1-4-342/1, in Sy. No. 267 admeasurinll 150 square Yards, situated at Bodhan Tarfa Douthyal Shivar, within the limits of Bodhan Municipality, Nizamabad District, on the strength of the registered sale deed bearing doc:ument No.8724 of 2OlB, dated 26.t0.2018. The grievance of the petitioner is that respondents are constructing compound 'wall on the southern side path way, without even leaving the way of ingress and outgress to the house property of the petitiont:r.
4. The ltetitioner has submitted a representation dated 20.06.2025 to the sth respondent. Having received and acknowledging the said representation the 5tt respondent did not act upon the same. Therefore, the petitioner filed the present writ petition
5. Learned counsel appearing for respondents submits that Stt respondent will consider the same and pass appropriate orders, in accordarrce of law. ,/ e
TO
6. Recording the submissions made by learned counsel appearing on either side and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this writ petition is disposed of directing the sth respondent to consider the representation dated 20.06.2025 and pass appropriate orders strictly, in accordance with law, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order and communicate the s€une to the petitioner. No order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous applications, if &ly, shall stand closed. r ( SD/-P.PONNA KRISHN4 , ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ./ /rRuE coPY// (g SECNONI OFFICER l.TheChairmanandManaging.Director,TelanganaStateRoadTransport " C;;o;;"t ;n' Musheerabad' Hlderabad'
2. The Chief Civil Engineer, The f"ir"ni?n*' State Road Transport Corporation' tvlusheerabad, HYderabad'
3. The Deputv e*"J,ltirJ"rl!i1""r, The Telangana state Road Transport v' C;;fft'ri,. r.riii m bad, -N i7a m abad District'
4. rhe Resionrr rrfin"!!iit1,;.!;fil;"; sirie Roao rransport corporation' f.f irima"Uad, Nizamabad Dlstrict'
5. TheDepotManager,T!"T".1?lg"l"stateRoadTransportCorporation'' v' e;dn;i-Depot, N-izamabad District'
6. one cc to sii S:suREN'-qn nebov' Advocate [oPuc]
7. one CC to sii N.SUSHAMAN' Advocate [oPUC]
8. Two CD CoPies \ SA GJP
.,/ HIGH COURT ATED:08/0112026
ORDER
WP.No.39746 of 2025 i\{E STA b ?.1 Jrtt z$f, I f,) i: * t Or \': :': l" D ai DISPOSING OF THE W.P 1o qt^ WITHOU'T COSTS