WP/26772/2009 of BANK OF MAHARASHTRA, HYD. Vs GREATER HYDERABAD MUNICIPAL CORP. AND ANOTHER on 8 January 2026

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

THURSDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF JANUARY

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENry SIX

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM KOSHY

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUDDALA CHALAPATHI RAO

WRIT PETITION NO:26772 OF 2009

Between:

BANK OF MAHARASHTRA, HYD., R

Regional Head and Assistant General

es

M

ional Office, Koti , Hyderabad Rep. by its anager

...PETITIONER

AND

I

GREATER HYDERABAD MUNICIPAL CORP, Rep. by Addl. Commissioner (Advertisements) Parking Complex, Abids, Hyderabad

2. M/s. USM Business Systems Pvt. Ltd.,, 1-8-31912., Patiguda Road, Behind Ford Showroom, Begumpet, Secunderabad

...RESPONDENTS

Petition under Article 226 ot the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affitlavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ order or direction more in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring that the Notice dt. 24-3-2OOg of the 1st respondent in Demand No. 403

as illegal, arbitrarty and violation of principles of natural justice.

l.A. NO: 1 OF 2009(WPMP. NO:34872 0F 20091

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in pursuance of the impugned notice in Demand No. 403

dt. 24-3-2OOg issued by the 1st respondent pending the t isposal of the writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI G.MALLESHAM, REP

SRI G. MADHUSUDHAN RE:l )DY

Counsel for the Respondent 1: SRI C. DAMODAR REDDY, {; 'ANDING

COUNSEL

FORGREATER HYDERABAI ) MUNICIPAL

CORPORATION.

Counsel for the Respondent No 2: --

The Court made the following: ORDER

i

l

l

l

t

I

IN TIIE HIGH COURT TOR TEE STATE OF TELANGAI\IA AT YDERABAD

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAMKOSHY

AND

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUDDALA CIIALAPATIII RAO

WRIT PETTTIO N No.26172 o12009

Date:08.0l

Between:

Bank of Maharashtra, HYderabad

... Petitioner

And

Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation'

Hyderabad and another.

.. .Respondents

BDEB' (per Hon'ble Sri Justice P'Sam Koshv)

Mr.G.Mallesham' Ieamed counsel representing Mr.G.Madhusudhan Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation appearing on behalf of respondent No.l.

2.

None appears for the petitioner' when the matter is taken-up'

On the last occasion also, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Therefore, we directed the matter to be posted under the caption'for dismissal'.

3.

ln view of the same, this Bench is left with no other option but to dismiss the writ petition for want of Prosecution'

4.

Accordingly, the Writ petition stands dismisse I for want of prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs.

Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall :;r rnd closed.

SD/.B. REKHA RANI

ASS ISTANT REGISTRAR

6;

//TRUE COPY/'

SECTION OFFICER

To,

1. One CC to SRI c. MADHUSUDHAN REDDY,Advocat r [OpUC]

2. One CC to SRI C. DAMODAR REDDY(SC FOR GHMC;) tOpUCI

3. Two CD Copies

DAN

BS

4l-

\

HIGH COURT

DATED:0810112026