Telangana High Court

AS/1972/2004 of Smt.Sehra Bhanu Vs Saifuddin Safderally on 6 January 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF JANUARY TUVO THOUSAND AND TWENW SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY APPEAL SUIT NO: 1972 OF 2004 Appeal filed under Section 19(1) of the Family Cou( Act,

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD

TUESDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF JANUARY

TUVO THOUSAND AND TWENW SIX

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY

APPEAL SUIT NO: 1972 OF 2004

Appeal filed under Section 19(1) of the Family Cou( Act, aggrieved by the Judgment and Decree dated 09.02.2004 in O.S.NO.3B of 200'1 , on the file of the Judge, Family Court, Secunderabad.

Between:

1. Smt. Sehra Bhanu, Wo.Saifuddin Safderally R/o. Plot No.47IBBA, RTC

colony, Tirumalgherry, Secunderabad.

2. Tahera Saifuddin, D/o. Saifuddin Safderally student R/o. Plot No.47l88A' RTC

colony, Tirumalgherry, Secunderabad.

Appellant No.2 declared as major by discharging the Appeilant No.'1 as guardian as per C.O., d1.31.3.2004 in CMP.No.717412004

3 Tasneem Saifuddin(minor) by mother, D/o.Saifuddin Safderally student R/o.

Plot No.47l88A, RTC colony, Tirumalgherry, Secunderabad

4. Sakina Saifuddin(minor) by mother, D/o.Saifuddin Safderally student R/o. Plot No.47IBBA, RTC colony, Tirumalgherry, Secunderabad Appellants 3 & 4 are being minors rep by appellant No- 1 natural mother and guardian.

APPELLANTS/Pla i ntiffs

AND

Saifuddin Safderally, S/o. late Safderally Abdul Kayum Occ Business R/o.3, Saklate Palace, Kolkata-7 2.

RESPONDENTS/Defendants

l.A. NO: 2 OF 2004(CMP. NO:7790 oF 2004)

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the aff idavit f iled in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to I@-7

..:-]:'

>ii;+-' ---l

="'t'

l

grant interim maintenance of Rs,1s,000/- per month for tl-t petitioners herein pending d isposal of appeal.

counsel for the Appeilants : sRl. M A ASHFAQ MoHluDt) N

Counsel for the Respondent : SRI RAVI POLICHETTI

The Court delivered the following : JUDGMENT

IN THE HIGH COURT FORTIIE STATE OFTELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD

THE HON'BLE SRIJUSTICE IC LAKSHMAN

AIID

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY

A.S.No.1972 of 2004

Date: 06.01.2026

Between:

Smt.Sehra Bhanu and others

...Appellants

And

Saifuddin Safderally

...Respondent

JUDGMENT: (Per Hon'ble Sri fiistice K.Lakshman)

Despite the matter being listed under the caption 'for dismissal', even today, there is no representation on behalf of the appellants as well as respondent.

2.

This appeal

IS hled against judgment and decree dated 09.02.2004 in O.S.No.3S of 2001 passed by the learned Judge, Family Court, Secunderabad. The iippellants herein filed the aforesaid suit claiming maintenance of Rs.15,000/- per month and also past maintenance of Rs.1,80,000/- and other reliefs from the respondent.

3.

Vide impugned judgment and decree, leamt;r tnal Court retumed the plaint with a liberty to the appellants, [, present the same before the proper Court within one week from tI e date of the judgment.

vide order dated 31.03.2004 in c.M.p.No .7172 >f 2004,this Court discharged rhe l.tappellant as guardian of the 2,,, appellant.

5.

In the light of the same, this appeal is dismilrl ed for non_

prosecution. Miscellaneous apptications pending, if an1 shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs.

S d/- MOHD. ISMAIL

Dt: IUTY REGTSTRAR

r_f

,TRUE COPY//

S

=CTION OFFICER

To,

b

1. The Judge, Family Court, Secunderabad.

2. One CC to SRt. M A ASHFAe MOHtUDDtN Advocate [Ol, JC]

3. One CC to SRt RAV| pOLtCHETTt Advocate tOpUCl

4. Two CD Copies

ASR,/PR

HIGH COURT

DATED:06101t2026

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

JUDGMENT

AS.No.1972 of 2004 DISMISSING THE .\PPEAI- FOR NON-PROSECUTION SlATE (t- 'Ct.-l 2f ,.-) itB 2il2[ .l( ? -\,' + a). b

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead