Telangana High Court
AS/1972/2004 of Smt.Sehra Bhanu Vs Saifuddin Safderally on 6 January 2026
COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF JANUARY TUVO THOUSAND AND TWENW SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY APPEAL SUIT NO: 1972 OF 2004 Appeal filed under Section 19(1) of the Family Cou( Act,
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
TUESDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF JANUARY
TUVO THOUSAND AND TWENW SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY
APPEAL SUIT NO: 1972 OF 2004
Appeal filed under Section 19(1) of the Family Cou( Act, aggrieved by the Judgment and Decree dated 09.02.2004 in O.S.NO.3B of 200'1 , on the file of the Judge, Family Court, Secunderabad.
Between:
1. Smt. Sehra Bhanu, Wo.Saifuddin Safderally R/o. Plot No.47IBBA, RTC
colony, Tirumalgherry, Secunderabad.
2. Tahera Saifuddin, D/o. Saifuddin Safderally student R/o. Plot No.47l88A' RTC
colony, Tirumalgherry, Secunderabad.
Appellant No.2 declared as major by discharging the Appeilant No.'1 as guardian as per C.O., d1.31.3.2004 in CMP.No.717412004
3 Tasneem Saifuddin(minor) by mother, D/o.Saifuddin Safderally student R/o.
Plot No.47l88A, RTC colony, Tirumalgherry, Secunderabad
4. Sakina Saifuddin(minor) by mother, D/o.Saifuddin Safderally student R/o. Plot No.47IBBA, RTC colony, Tirumalgherry, Secunderabad Appellants 3 & 4 are being minors rep by appellant No- 1 natural mother and guardian.
APPELLANTS/Pla i ntiffs
AND
Saifuddin Safderally, S/o. late Safderally Abdul Kayum Occ Business R/o.3, Saklate Palace, Kolkata-7 2.
RESPONDENTS/Defendants
l.A. NO: 2 OF 2004(CMP. NO:7790 oF 2004)
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the aff idavit f iled in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to I@-7
..:-]:'
>ii;+-' ---l
="'t'
l
grant interim maintenance of Rs,1s,000/- per month for tl-t petitioners herein pending d isposal of appeal.
counsel for the Appeilants : sRl. M A ASHFAQ MoHluDt) N
Counsel for the Respondent : SRI RAVI POLICHETTI
The Court delivered the following : JUDGMENT
IN THE HIGH COURT FORTIIE STATE OFTELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
THE HON'BLE SRIJUSTICE IC LAKSHMAN
AIID
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY
A.S.No.1972 of 2004
Date: 06.01.2026
Between:
Smt.Sehra Bhanu and others
...Appellants
And
Saifuddin Safderally
...Respondent
JUDGMENT: (Per Hon'ble Sri fiistice K.Lakshman)
Despite the matter being listed under the caption 'for dismissal', even today, there is no representation on behalf of the appellants as well as respondent.
2.
This appeal
IS hled against judgment and decree dated 09.02.2004 in O.S.No.3S of 2001 passed by the learned Judge, Family Court, Secunderabad. The iippellants herein filed the aforesaid suit claiming maintenance of Rs.15,000/- per month and also past maintenance of Rs.1,80,000/- and other reliefs from the respondent.
3.
Vide impugned judgment and decree, leamt;r tnal Court retumed the plaint with a liberty to the appellants, [, present the same before the proper Court within one week from tI e date of the judgment.
vide order dated 31.03.2004 in c.M.p.No .7172 >f 2004,this Court discharged rhe l.tappellant as guardian of the 2,,, appellant.
5.
In the light of the same, this appeal is dismilrl ed for non_
prosecution. Miscellaneous apptications pending, if an1 shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
S d/- MOHD. ISMAIL
Dt: IUTY REGTSTRAR
r_f
,TRUE COPY//
S
=CTION OFFICER
To,
b
1. The Judge, Family Court, Secunderabad.
2. One CC to SRt. M A ASHFAe MOHtUDDtN Advocate [Ol, JC]
3. One CC to SRt RAV| pOLtCHETTt Advocate tOpUCl
4. Two CD Copies
ASR,/PR
HIGH COURT
DATED:06101t2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
JUDGMENT
AS.No.1972 of 2004 DISMISSING THE .\PPEAI- FOR NON-PROSECUTION SlATE (t- 'Ct.-l 2f ,.-) itB 2il2[ .l( ? -\,' + a). b