Telangana High Court

WP/37744/2025 of T. Venkattram Reddy Vs National Company Law Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench - I, on 31 December 2025

Cites 0, Cited by 0

THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI APARESH KUMAR SINGH AND THE HONOURABLE SRIJUSTICE G.M. MOHIUDDIN WRIT PETITION NO: 37744 OF

[ 34881

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI APARESH KUMAR SINGH

AND

THE HONOURABLE SRIJUSTICE G.M. MOHIUDDIN

WRIT PETITION NO: 37744 OF 2025

Between:

T. Venkattram Reddy, S/o Late Mr. T. Chandrasekhar Reddy, Aged about 60

years, Occ- Business Ft/o. Plot No. 54, House No. 8-2-703lA-6-C, Road No.

12, Baryara Hills, Hyderabad, 560034.

...PETITIONER

AND

1. National Company Law Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench - l, Office at Corporate Bhawan, Bandlaguda Tattiannaram Village, Hayatnagar Mandal, Rangareddy District, Hyderabad-500068

2. I &T Finance Limited, Brindavan, Plot No. 177, C.S.T. Road, Kalina, Santacruz (East), Mumbai, Maharashtra, lndia, 400098.

3. Ms. Renuka Devi Rangaswamy, R/o. Arthi lllam, 9, Jothi Nagar, 3rd Street, Uppolipalayam Post, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, 641015.

...RESPONDENTS

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to pass an order or orders, direction or writ more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, directing the Respondent No. 1 to keep CP (lB) No.

88l95lHDBl2O21 pending on its file in abeyance/adjoum the matter sine-die until the pronouncement of final orders by Ld. National Company Law Appellate Tribunal in Company Appeal (AT) (lnsolvency) No. 383 oI 2022 preferred against order dt. 2410612022 passed by Respondent No. 1.

NO: 1 OF 2025

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all the proceedings pending on the file of National Company Law Tribunal, Hyderabad - Bench I in CP (lB) No. 88/9S/HDB t2O21.

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI VADEENDRA JOSHI

Counsel for the Respondent No.1: SRI N. BHUJANGA RAO, DEPUW SOLICITOR GENERAL OF INDIA

counsel for the Respondent No.2: MT.SHABBEER AHMED, ADVOCATE

Counsel for the Respondent No.3: - - -

The Court made the following: ORDER

r

I

i

:

I

l

l

:

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT TTYDERABAD

The Hon'ble The ChiefJustice Sri Aparesh Kumar Singh

and

The Hon'ble Sri [ustice G.M.Mohiuddin

Writ Petition No.37744 of 2025

Dated:31.12.2025

Between:

Mr. T.Venkatram Reddy,

S/o Mr. T.Chandrasekhar Reddy

...Petitione r

and

National Company Law Tribunal,

Hyderabad Bench-I, Hyderabad and2 otherc Respondents

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

Order:

Mr. Vadeendra Joshi, learned counsel appears for the petitioner; Mr. N.Bhujanga Rao, learned Deputy Solicitor General of India appears for respondent No.1 and Mr. Shabbeer Ahmed, learned counsel appears for respondent No.2.

2. This !7rit Petition is filed for the following relief: "T'o pass an order or orders, direction or writ, more particulady one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, directing the Respondent No.1 to keep CP(IB) No.8B/95/HDB/2O27,pending on its fi.Ie, in abeyancefadjourn thc matte r sine die unal, the pronouncement of final orders by learned National Company Law Appellate Tribunal l ) t {

..'t.. in Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No.383 of 2022 prcferred against order dated 24.06.2022 passed by Respondent No.1."

3. Both the learned counsel for the parties submit that the Writ Peridon has become inflructuous in vier.v of the order dated 19.1,2.2025, passed by the National Company Law Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench-I, Hyderabad, m

To,

1. t2. I

1. k

5.

6. PMK PVL for the parties, the instant writ Pcririon is disposed of as infrucruous. No costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, pending tf any,, stand closed C.P. (IB).No.88/9 s / HDB / 2021 . In view of aforesaid submission made bt, learned counsel SD/- K. MADHAVI STANT REGISTR^AR //TRUE COPY// CTION OFFICER The National Company Law Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench - l, Office at Corporate Bhawad, Bandlaguda Tattiannaram Village, Hayatnagar Mandal, Rangareddy District, Hyderabad-500068 The L & T Finance Limited, Brindavan, Plot No. 177, C.S.T. Road, Kalina, Santacruz (East), Mumbai, Maharashtra, lndia, 400098 One CC to SRI VADEENDRA JOSHI, Advocate [OPUC] One CC to SRI SHABBEER AHIMED, Advocate [OPUC] One CC to SRI N. BHUJANGA RAO, DEPUTY SOLICITOR GENERAL OF rNDrA IOPUC] Two CD Cooies w I

I I i I i HIGH COURT DATED i3111212025

ORDER

WP.No.37744 of 2025 DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT C @ + * .:' 4 s ,: zut rtB

<) .{rr. ; -.iii:d_',:.i '

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead