Telangana High Court
CRP/4180/2025 of Dharani Noorali Vs Mr. Shahed Siddiqui on 31 December 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENry FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM KOSHY CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO : 4180 0F 2025 Petition under Nlicle 227 of the constitution of lndia aggrieved by the order
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENry FIVE
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM KOSHY
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO : 4180 0F 2025
Petition under Nlicle 227 of the constitution of lndia aggrieved by the order dated 07-10-2025 passed in t.A.No. t 1to of 2o2s in o.s.No.'|0 of 2o2s on the fite of the Cou( of the XXVI Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, at Hyderabad.
Between:
1. Dharani Noorali, Sio Dharani pvarali, Age: 53 years, Occ: Business, R/o FIat No. 501, Daredias Sky Garden, Kompally village, Kompally, Medchal Malkajgiri District.
2. Sahil Noorani, S/o Siraj Noorani, Age:33 years, Occ: Business, R/o. H No 5_g_
342, Vamsiram Homes Flat No. 20.1, Second Floor, Chirag Ali Lane, Abids, Nampally, Hyderabad.
3. Zoh..a Noorani, Wo Sahil Noorani, Age: 33 years, Occ: Business, R/o Flat No.
201, Second Floor, Chirag Ali Lane, Hyderabad.
AND
...petitioners/Respondents No.3,4 & 7
1. Mr. Shahed Siddiqui, S/o, Mr. Abdul Razzak Siddiqui, Age: 63 years, Occ:
Business, PJo21-1-92, Ghansi Bazar, Moti Masjid, Nayapul, -Charminar, Hyderabad.
...RespondenUPlaintiff
2. Mr. Amaan Nooruddin Dharani, S/o Nooruddin Dharani, Age:30 years, Occ:
Business, Rlio H.No.5-9-200, Flat No. 30i, Aashnas plateau-, Chirag Ali Lane, Nampally, Hyderabad.
3. Salim Ratnani, S/o Mehadi. Bhai Ratnani, Age:42 years, Occ: Business, Rl/o H.no.5-9-200, Flat No. 30'1 , Aashnas plateau, Chirag Ali Lane, Nampally, Hyderabad.
4. Fareed Gilnani, Sio Firoz Ali, Age: 46 years, Occ: Business, Rl/o B_73, Jarimabad Colony, Chirag Ali Lane, Nampally, Hyderabad.
5. Sirajuddin Sadruddin Noorani, S/o Sadruddin Noorani, Age: 61 years, Occ:
Business, Ri/o H.No.5-B-342, Vamsiram Homes, Flat No.201, Second Floor, Chirag Ali Lane, Abids, Hyderabad.
...Respondents/Respondents No.l,2,S and 6
lA NO: 1 OF 2025
Petition under section 151 cPc praying that in the ; 'cumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High cour may be pleased to stay all further proceedings pursuant to orders dl. 07-1o-2cr 5 passed in l.A No.
11iOt2O2S in OS No. 1OI2O2S on the file of Court of the ) Xl Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court , Hyderabad pending disposal of ttrr above CRP in the interest of justice.
Counsel for the Petitioners: Mr. Mohd. Abdul Rasheed Counsel for the Respondent No.1: Mr. P. Giri Krishna Counsel for the Respondents No.2 to 5:--- The Court made the following: ORDER
(
IN THE HIGH COURTFORTHE STATE OFTELANGANA
ATHYDERAB AD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAIVIKOSHY
Civil Revision Petition No.4180 of2025
Dated: 31.L2.2025
Between:
Dharani Noorali & others
. . . Petitioners
AND
Mr.Shahed Siddiqui & others
. . .Respondents
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
Heard Mr-Mohd.Abdur Rasheed, leamed counser for the petitioners and Mr.P.Giri Krishna, leamed counser for respondent No. 1. perused the record.
2. The instant is the revision petition fired assailing the order dated 07 -10.2025 on the fire of XXVI Additional chief Judge, ciry civil court, Hyderabad in I.A.No.l170 of 2025 in O.S.No.l0 of 2025.
3. Vtde impugned order, the trial Court rejected the aforesaid I.A. filed by defendant Nos.3, 4 and 7 under Order VII Rule 1l read with Section 151 CPC. The contenrion of the petitioners in I.A.No.l170 of 2025 was that the suit is otherwise barred by law and as much p the suit , is concemed, on the basis of the averments in the plaint itself would go to -.
show that he is only a shareholder in the entitled prop(x .y and unless and until there is a suit for partition instituted by the plaint r i the present suit seeking for declaration and recovery of possession anl also cancellation of agreement of sale cum General Power of Attonr. y would not be maintainable.
4. However, perusal of the material on record v that there is a subsequent averment made by the pla:r certain illegalities which is said to have been committt,r substantial share in the suit schedule property which co r share got reduced from 16.66%oto ll.l2o/o. Further it r,, there was certain false representations made by de le represented the plaintiff while executing a sale deecl < All these contentions make the factual matrix of the c,as and which require to be adjudicated only after recordir 1 In the course, the petitioners/defendants would also grt forth their defense in cross examination on the plairr. aspect of maintainability of the suit itself and which c z after appropriate issues is framed based upon the object written statement by the petitioners/defendants. ould go to show tiff in respect of and whether the es to the plaintiff .s also lound that rdant No.6 who ated 04.07.2023. : highly disputed of the evidence. a chance to put- ilfs even on the n be adj udicated ons raised in the
To,
5. In view of the same, this Court does not find any jurisdictional error or illegality on the part of the trial Court in deciding I.A.No.1l70 of 2025 in O.S.No.t0 of 2025 dated,07.tO.2025.
6. Accordingly, this Civil Revision perition being devoid of merits, stands dismissed. Nonetheless, petitioner wourd be at liberty to raise all the contentions in the written statement which is expected to be considered by the trial Court while deciding the suit. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shail stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs. Sd/. T. SRID S STANT REG //TRUE COPY// CTION OFFICER The XXVI Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, at yd rabad One CC to Mr. Mohd. Abdul Rasheed' Advocate [OP One CC to Mr. P. Giri Krishna, Advocate [OPUC] Two CD Copies kamW
HIGH COURT DATED:31 11212025
ORDER
CRP.No.4180 of 2025 DISMISSING THE CRP iHE.J € ,. I :)() ,1 v1:1 rl?F nArc c)t t * I )- r6 yb ( a(