Telangana High Court
CRLP/17857/2025 of Preetham Induri, Vs State of Telangana, on 31 December 2025
COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMAER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEV! EADA CRIMINAL PET]TION NO: 17857 0F 2025 Between: Preetham lnduri, S/o lnduri Srinivas occup years,R/o H.No. 1-2-356/'1,
!N THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMAER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEV! EADA
CRIMINAL PET]TION NO: 17857 0F 2025
Between:
Preetham lnduri, S/o lnduri Srinivas occup years,R/o H.No. 1-2-356/'1, Prakasham Road, ation: private employee Aged 22
Korutla, Jagtial District
...PET!TIONER
AND
State of Telangana,, Rep. by Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana, Hyderabad
...RESPONDENT
Petition under Section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to Quash the proceedings in SC POCSO No. 62 of 2025, arising out of FIR No. 25912025 daled 21.07.2025 registered by Korutla Police Station, Jagtial District, for the alleged offences under Section 67-8 of the lnformation Technotogy Act, 2008 and Section 15 of the POCSO Act,2012
l.A. NO: 1OF 2025
Petition under Section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the Hiqh Court may be pleased to Dispense with the personal appearance of the Petitioner in SC
POCSO No. 62 of 2025, arising out of FIR No.25912025 dated 21.O7.2025 on the file of the learned Special Court under the POCSO Act, Korutla, during the pendency of the present q uash petition This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Ms.
DURISHETTY AKHILA, Advocate for the Petitioner and SRl. JITHENDER RAO
VEERAMALLA, Additional Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Sole Respondent The Court made the following: ORDER
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT
HYDERABAD
THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA
CRIMINAL PETITIONNo -17857 of 2025
Date:31.12.2O25
Between:
Preetham lnduri, S/o. lnduri Srinivas
...Petitioner
AND
The State of Telangana,
Represented by ib Public Prosecutor,
High Court for the State of Telangana,
HyderabarJ.
...Respondent
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
:: ORDER::
This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023 seeking to quash the S.C.POCSO No.62 of 2025 in FtR No.259 of 2O2S dated 21.OT.2025, on the file of Korutla Police Station, Jagtial District, registered under Section 67-8 of lT Act, 2008 and Section 15 of pOCSO Act,2O12.
2. Heard Ms. Durishetty Akhila, leamed counsel for the petitioner as well as Sri Jithender Rao Veeramalla, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent-State. /I
\' 2 ETD, J c,fip-t7817 -2o25
3. When the mafter is taken up for hearing, leamed counsel for the petitioner has limited her arguments seeking a direction to dispensewiththeappearanceofthepetitionerbeforetheTrialCourt.
4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that appropriate orders maY be Passed.
5. Perused the record. The allegations leveled against the petitioner/accused pertain to the offences punishable under Section 67-8 of lT Act, 2008 and Section 15 of POCSO Ad'' 2O12 in FIR No.259 of 2025 is registered on the file of Korutla Police station' Jagtial District.
6. Considering the submission of the leamed counsel for the petitioner,theCriminalPetitionisdisposedofdispensingwiththe presence of the petitioner/accused before the Trial Court provided that the petitioner is represented through an Advocate on every date of hearing and that he shall be present before the Trial Court whenever he is specifically required during the course of trial'
7. Miscellaneouspetitionspending' if any, shall stand closed. Sd,- K. MADHAV ASSISTANT REGIS iiTRUE COPY// ION OFFICER
1. The Judicial Magistrate First Class at Korutla' Jagtial District
2. The station House officer, Korutla Police station, Korutla, Jagtial District
3. One CC to Ms. DURISHETTY AKHILA Advocate IOPUC]
4. TwoCCstoPublicProsecutor'HighCourtfortheStateofTelanganaat Hyderabad [OUTI To,
HIGH COURT DATED: 311121,2025
ORDER
CRLP.No.1 785',r ol 2025 OISPOSING THE CRIMINAL PETITION I o .J ( t 1HES 1 I rr8 2fl2n oi, * \, q v +,