WP/40555/2025 of Kolli Ramarao Vs The State of Telangana on 31 December 2025

432s71

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENW FIVE

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE JUWADI SRIDEVI

WRIT

AND

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

Kolli Ramarao, S/o. Sanyasi Appadu, Aged about 45 years, Occ. Business, R/o. H.No.7-8-292, Gowtham Nagar Old Airport Road, Ferozguda Balanagar, Hyderabad.

...PETITIONER

The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary Home Department Secretariat, Hyderabad.

The Director General of Police, Government of Telangana Lakdikapool, Hyderabad.

The Commissioner of Police, Cyberabad Commissionerate Cyberabad.

The Deputy Commissioner of Police, Cyberabad Commissionerate Miyapur Zone, Cyberabad.

The Station House Officer, Kukatpally Police Station, Cyberabad Commissionerate, Ranga Reddy District.

RESPONDENTS

Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the Respondent Nos.3 to 5 in failing toJnitiate.action on the complaint filed by the petitioner dt.16-12.2025 ."

against the named culprits as per the provisions of BNS Act till date as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and violation of Article 14, 21 and 300-4 of Constitution of lndia and in violation of the provisions of BNSS and consequently direct the R_espondent nos.3 to 5 to forthwith initiate necessary action on the complaint of the petitioner d1.16.12.2025 against the named culprits in the interest of justice.

f-)

lAl.lO: 1 OF 2025

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondent Nos.3 to 5 to forthwith initiate necessary action on the complaint of the petitioner dt.16.12.2025 against the named culprits as per the provisions of BNSS, in the interest of justice, pending disposal of the above writ ptitition.

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI C.HARI PREETH

Counsel for the Respondents: SRI M.SRINIVAS, AGP FOR HOME

The Court made the following: ORDER

I

a

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT TTTDERABAD

THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE JTIIIVADI SRIDEVT

Between:

Kolli Ramarao

31ST DTCEMBER. 2025

... Petitioners

AND

The State of Telang€rna

Rep. by its Principal Secretary,

Home Department,

I '

Secretariat, Hyderabad and four others

: .RDER :

"'ResPondents

This writ petition is filed seeking the following relief:

_

o...to i.ssue a writ, order or direction more partianlarlg one in the nature of Writ of Mand.amus dbclaring tie action of respondent /vos.3 to s in faiting to iiitiate action on the compraint Jited bg the petiiioner dated 16.12.2025 against the named" antprits as per the prouisions o/ B/VS Act titt date as illegal, aibit ary, unonstituttonar and uioration of Articres 14, 21 and 300-A of corrctittttion of India and in uioration of ttrc provisiors o/ Bivss anir consequentty direct the respondenf /vos.3 to s to forthwith initiite necessary action on *Le complaint of the petitioner d.ated.

16.12.2025 against the named atlpits ..."

Heard. sri c. Hari preeth, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri M.Srinivas, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents. with the consent of both the parties, the matter is taken up for disposal at the stage of admission.

3.

Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing for the respondents'on written instructions would submit that the complaint sent by the petitioner through registered post was received by respondent No.5 police station on 30.12.2025 and upon examination of the contents of the complaint, respondent No.5 registered a case in FIR

No. 1715 of 2025 dated 30.12.2025 for the offences under Sections 318 (4) and 351 (2) of BNS against K.V.D. prasad- accused No. 1, Kotwala Madhuri-accused No.2 and K.L.V.

Apparao-accused No.3 and Narajarla Chandra Sekhara Rao- accused No.4 and the matter is presently under investigation at the preliminaqr stage. It is further stated that in view of the admitted factual position, the allegation that the respondent police failed to initiate action on the petitioner's complaint is false, incorrect and investigation is under progress and thus no cause of action survives in the present writ petition and the same is liable to be dismissed.

4.

A perusal of the record would disclose that upon receipt of the complaint from the petitioner, F.I.R.No.L7IS of 2O2S

dated 3O. 12.2025 has been registered against the culprits by the respondent No.S-Police Station for the offences under a

Sections 318 (4) and 351 (2) of BNS and the investigation is under progress. Therefore, in view of the registration of F.I.R, this Court finds no reason or cause for adjudicating the present petition and the same is liable to be closed.

5.

[n view of the aforesaid discussion, this writ petition is closed Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. No costs.

GOWRI

ANT

,/TRUE COPY/

I

To,

BSR

OFFICER

of Telangana at

1. One CC to SRI C'HARI PREETH' Advocate IOPUCI

? Two CCs to GP FOR HOME' High Court for the HYderabad [OUT]

3. Two CD CoPies

!,.

\

il

i

I

I

I

I

I

- HIGH GOURT

DATED: 31 11212025