Telangana High Court

CRLP/17534/2025 of B. Anand Kumar Vs The State of Telangana, through S.H.O., Lungerhouse Police Station, Hyderabad. on 31 December 2025

Cites 0, Cited by 0

COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE K. SUJANA CRIMINAL PETITION No.17534 of 2025 DATE: 31.12.2025 BETWEEN: B. Anand Kumar …..petitioner/accused And The State of Telangana, Rep. by Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana, at Hyderabad.

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD

THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE K. SUJANA

CRIMINAL PETITION No.17534 of 2025

DATE: 31.12.2025

BETWEEN:

B. Anand Kumar

…..petitioner/accused

And

The State of Telangana,

Rep. by Public Prosecutor,

High Court for the State of Telangana,

at Hyderabad.

…..Respondent/complainant

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short ‘BNSS’) for grant of pre-arrest bail to the petitioner, who is arrayed as accused in Crime No.152 of 2025 before the Langer House

SKS,J Crl.P.No.17534 of 2025

Police Station, Hyderabad, registered for the offences punishable under Section 316(5) and 318(1) of BNS.

2. The brief facts of the case are that on 22.07.2025 at about 12:20 hours, a complaint was received from Y. Srinivas Naik, Assistant Superintendent of Post Offices. He reported that the Sub-Postmaster of Lungerhouse Sub-Post Office had retained excess cash between 13.06.2025 and 05.07.2025 without submitting Excess Cash Balance memos. Pursuant to departmental directions, an enquiry was conducted on 09.07.2025, during which a shortage of cash of Rs.6,17,584/- was found against the actual balance of Rs.9,09,135.91. The Sub-Postmaster, Sri B. Anand Kumar, admitted the shortage and stated that he would make good the amount. As he was found to have misappropriated Government money, a report was submitted to the authorities, and basing on the said complaint, the present crime was registered.

3. Heard Sri P.V. Krishnaiah, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner as well as Sri D. Arun Kumar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of the respondent – State.

SKS,J Crl.P.No.17534 of 2025

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that though there was a shortage of cash, the petitioner had already deposited the said amount, and there was no intention on his part to cheat the Government. He contended that the petitioner is innocent of the allegations leveled against him, as the alleged amount has already been deposited, and that the petitioner is ready to cooperate with the investigating agency. Therefore, he prayed the Court to grant pre-arrest bail to the petitioner by allowing this Criminal Petition.

5. On the other hand, learned Additional Public Prosecutor opposed the submissions made on behalf of the petitioner, stating that the allegations levelled against the petitioner are serious in nature. He further submitted that, as per the information available with him, the petitioner has already deposited the alleged amount. Therefore, he prayed the Court to dismiss the Criminal Petition.

6. In the light of the submissions made by both learned counsel and upon perusal of the material available on record, it appears that the main allegation against the petitioner is

SKS,J Crl.P.No.17534 of 2025

that he misappropriated Government funds and that there was a shortage of cash. According to the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, the petitioner has already deposited the said amount. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court deems it fit to grant pre-arrest bail to the petitioner, subject to the following conditions: i. The petitioner shall surrender before the Station House Officer, Lunger House Police Station, Hyderabad, within two weeks from today, and on such surrender, the said Station House Officer shall release him on bail on executing a personal bond for Rs.25,000/-, each, with two sureties, for the like sum each. ii. The petitioner shall abide by the other conditions stipulated in Section 482(2) of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 and co-operate with the Investigating Officer in investigating the case. iii. The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Investigating Officer on every Monday between 09:00 a.m, and 05:00 p.m., for a period of eight (8) weeks or till the filing of the charge

SKS,J Crl.P.No.17534 of 2025

sheet, whichever is earlier and thereafter, as and when required.

7. Accordingly, this Criminal Petition is allowed.

Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. _______________ K. SUJANA, J

Date: 31.12.2025 SAI

SKS,J Crl.P.No.17534 of 2025

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE K. SUJANA

CRIMINAL PETITION No.17534 of 2025 ` Date: 31.12.2025 SAI

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead