Telangana High Court
CRLP/760/2025 of S. Dilip Kumar Vs The State of Telangana on 31 December 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECETUBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J SREENIVAS RAO CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 760 OF 2025 Between: 1. S. Dilip Kumar, S/o. Late Suwaal Agarvval, Age: 59 Yrs, Occ.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
WEDNESDAY,THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECETUBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J SREENIVAS RAO
CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 760 OF 2025
Between:
1. S. Dilip Kumar, S/o. Late Suwaal Agarvval, Age: 59 Yrs, Occ. Business, R/o Flat No.20'l , Hamara Ghar, Near Raaganjah Geetanjali Apartments, Nalanda Nagar, Attapur, Ranga Reddy Districl500048.,
2. Smt. D.Rita Devi, Wo. S.Dilip Kumar, Aged about: 56 years, Occ: Household, R/o. Flat No.201, Hamara Ghar, Near Raaganjali Geetanjali Apartments, Nalanda Nagar, Attapur, Ranga Reddy District-500048 ,
...Petitioners/Accused No. 1 & 2
1. The State of Telangana, Rep by its Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana At Hyderabad
2. Gokari Veera Arjun Goud, S/o. Late G.[Vlallaiah. Age: 51 years, Occ:
Business, R/ o. Flat No.1 , Srivilas Apartments, AC Guards, Lakdikapul'
Hyderabad, T.S.,
...Respondents/Defacto Complainant
Petition under Section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the lt/lemorandum of Grounds of Crrminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the proceedings in Crime. No 1222 of 2024' Dt. 1811212024
on the file of Rajendranagar Police Station, Rangareddy District, against the Petitioners/ Accused No.1 and 2.
AND
l.A. NO: 2 OF 2025
Petition under Section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings in Crime No. 1222 of 2024, Dt'
18.12.2024 on the file of Raiendranagar Police Station, Rangareddy District, rncluding arrest of Petitioners/Accused No.1 and 2 till the disposal of the Criminal Petition in the interest of the justice.
This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusrn(, Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the argur Priya, Counsel representing ftils Anshul Agarwal ,Advocate I
lvlr M Vivekananda Reddy. the Assistant Public Prosect Respondent No. 1 and Ms Preethi, Counsel represen i Advocate for the Respondent No. 2
The Court made the following: ORDER
the Memorandum of
rents of Ms SwaPna
rr the Petitioners and
:or on behalf of the
rg tVls M Tejaswini,
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT IIYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J.SREENIVAS RAO
CRIMINAL PETITION No.760 of 2025
Date:31.12.2025
Between:
S.Dilip Kumar and another
...Petitioners
AND
The State ofTelangana,
Rep. by its Public Prosecutor,
High Court for the State of Telangana,
At Hyderabad and another
..Respondents
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
This Criminal Petition has been filed seeking to quash the proceedings in Crime No.l222 of 2024 on the file of Rajendranagar Police Station, Rangareddy District, wherein the petitioners were arrayed as accused Nos.l and 2, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 406 and 420 ofthe Indian Penal Code, 1860
2. Heard Ms.Swapna Priya, learned counsel representing Ms.Anshul Agarwal, learned counsel for petitioners. Mr.M.Vivekananda Reddy, leamed Assistant Public Prosecutor for \ t respondent No. 1 and Ms.Preethi, learned couns t Ms.M.1'ejasrvini, Iearned counsel for respondent No.2
3. During the course of hearing, learned l. Prosecutor submitted that during the pendency of the 1 petition, the lnvestigating Officer, after conducting ir recording the statements of witncsses, filed a final re teamed Addrtional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, The said Court has taken cognizance and the case u'i C.C.No. 1466 of 2025, rvherein summons have beir petitioners.
4. By virtue of the same, the cause in this crimirt not survive for adjudication.
5. Accordingly, the criminal petition is c l, petitioners ale granted liberty to avail the remedies tLr law, including the grounds which are pleaded in the cri Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, sha IJ //TRUE COPY// SdI, P. PONNA KRISHNA r AS! TSTANT REG|STRAR -7 \ I representing sistant Public resent crilninal restigation and lort before the Rajendranagar. s numbered as issued to the Ll petition does sed. However, available under ninal petition. stand closed. i I To, \ ,'
1. The Xt Additional Judicial Magistrate Cyberabaci'of F Rajendranagar, Ranga Reddy District
2. The Station House Officer, Rajendranagar police Sta
3. Two CCs to the public prosecutor, High Court for the Hyderabad.(OUT) Atj 1 9n" CC to tMs Anshut AEarwat, Advocate tOpUCI W ? 9nu 99 to I\4s M Tejaswini, Advocate tOpiJCl
6. Two CD Copies SECTION OFFICER irs t Class at tior , Cyberabad. S t rte of Telangana at 7:=M
HIGH COURT DATED:31 11212025
ORDER
CRLP.No.760 of 2025 CLOSING THE CRIMINAL PETITION -:- ' . {t J' f si,[ rl zrflt I Al{ ! t * oo 'i Ct . ,'.,' -t ..-, I a\