Telangana High Court
CRLP/17917/2025 of Mohammed Zaki Rana Qurram Vs The State of Telangana, on 31 December 2025
COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 179'17 OF 2025 Between: Mohammed Zaki Rana Qurram, , S/o. Mohammed Saleem Rana, Age 27 years, occ
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
WEDNESDAY,THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA
CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 179'17 OF 2025
Between:
Mohammed Zaki Rana Qurram, , S/o. Mohammed Saleem Rana, Age 27
years, occ student, Rl/o. Flat No.'102, 1St floor, H.No.12-2-78416, Rethibowli, Hyderabad.
...PETITIONERYACCUSED No. 1
AND
1. The State of Telangana,, Through SHO, P.S. Panjagutta, Hyderabad District, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad
2. Smt. Sumaiyah Sultana,, D/o. Abdul Hameed, Age 21 years, Occ Housewife, R/o. Flat No.206, Prathima Xanudu Apts., Dwarakapuri Colony, Panjagutta, Hyderabad
...RESPONDENT/DEFACTO COMPLAINANT
Petition under Section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to Quash the proceedings in C.C. No. 2908 of 2025 on the file of the Honourable Xlll Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Hyderabad, against the petitioner/ Accused No. 1 in the interest of justice Petition under Section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant interim stay of all further proceedings including appearance of the petitioner/Accused No. 1 in C.C. No. 2908 of 2O25 on the file of the Xlll Addl.
Chief Judicial Magistrate, Hyderabad, pending disposal of the criminal petition, This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri S
SURENDER REDDY ,Advocate for the Petitioner and the Additional Public Prosecutor (TG) on behalf of the Respondent No. 1. and none appeared for the Respondent No. 2.
The Court made the following: ORDER
I
I
I
l.A. NO: 2 OF 2025
ii
I
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVIEADA
CRIMINAL PETITION No.17917 ot 2O25
DATE OF ORDER:- 31.12.2025
Betwee n:
Mohammed Zaki Rana Qurram,
S/o.Mohammed Saleem Rana,
Rl/o.Hyderabad.
... Petrtioner/Accused No.1
AND
The State of Telangana through SHO, Panjagutta P.S., rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Telangana at Hyderabad & another.
. . . Respondents
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
1. This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023 seeking to quash the proceedings against the petitioner/accused No.1 in C.C.No.2908 of 2025, on the file of the learned Xlll Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Hyderabad, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 406, 42O,498(4), 323 and 506 read with 34 of IPC and Sections 3 & 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act
2. Heard Sri S.Surender Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Sri Jitender Rao Veeramalla, the learned _t
EID,J Crlp_17917_)025 Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent No.1- State.
3. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner has limited his prayer seeking a direction to dispense with the appearance of the petitioner before the Trial Court.
4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that appropriate orders may be passed.
5. Perused the record. C.C.No.290B oI 2025 is pending on the file of the learned Xlll Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Hyderabad. Considering the submissions made by both parties and in view of the facts and circumstances of the caSe, it is deemed appropriate to dispose of the Criminal Petition by dispensing with the appearance of the petitioner before the Trial Court.
6. Hence, the Criminal Petition is disposed of dispensing with the presence of the petitioner/accused No.'1 before the Trial Court provided that the petitioner is represented through an Advocate on every date of hearing and that he shall be present before the Trial Court whenever his presence is specifically required during the course of trial I I \\ I
To,
7. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed ETD,) Olp_17917_2A2s Sd/. U. SUDHA STANT REGISTRAR AS I I ,TRUE COPY// ECTION OFFICER
1. The Xlll Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Hyderabad District.
2. The SHO, Panjagutta Police Station, Hyderabad District.
3. One CC to SRl. S SURENDER REDDY Advocate [OPUC]
4. Two CCs to PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad [OUT].
5. Two CD Copies Pk,'DL I I .lk;,
HIGH COURT DATED:31 11212025 1 ic -\ ;.{ ..)o 2I JAil 2U6 v2. r:.,
ORDER
CRLP.No.17917 of 2025 DISPOSING OF THE CRIMINAL PEITITION \ \\a; I I Cr. I 'A @ I