Telangana High Court
CRLP/17950/2025 of Sadaiah Maruku, Vs The State of Telangana., on 31 December 2025
COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 17950 OF 2025 Between: Sadaiah Maruku, S/o Ramaswamy Aged about 50 yrs, Occ..Business, R/o.H.No
\
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA
CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 17950 OF 2025
Between:
Sadaiah Maruku, S/o Ramaswamy Aged about 50 yrs, Occ..Business, R/o.H.No 4-2341 l,Raghavapur, Peddapalli, peddapall i Dist
... PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO. 1
AND
1 The State of Telangana, rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Judicature at Hyderabad for the P.S, Peddapalli, Peddapalli Dist
...RESPONDENT NO.1/COMPLAINANT
2. lvl. Krishnaveni, Bench Clerk, JFCM Court, Peddapalli ,..RESPONDENT NO.2/DEFACTO COMPLAINANT
Petition under Section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to Quash the proceedings of the petitioner/ Accused No.1 in C.C.No 67 of 2018 ln the Court of The Judicial Magistrate Of First Class, At Peddapalli, for the alleged offence U/sec 419,42O R/w 34 lPC, as it is illegal, arbitrary, unjust and do not attract the ingredients of alleged offence
l.A. NO: 1OF 2025
Petition under Section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the lrilemorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant Stay of all further proceedings of the petitioner /Accused No.1 in C.C. No 67 of 2018 ln the Court of The Judicial Magistrate Of First Class, At Peddapalli, for the alleged offence U/sec 419,420 R/w 34 IPC
This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Mrs. Sunitha Akula, Advocate for the Petitioner and Sri. Jithender Rao Veeramalla, Additional Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.'1 .
The Court made the following: ORDER
I
I
lN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF Tr: .ANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE TIRUMALA DE VI EADA
CRIMINAL PETITION No.17950 of 2015
DATE OF ORDER:- 31.12.2025
Between:
Sadaiah Maruku,
S/o.Ramaswamy
R/o. Peddapalli District
Petition: /Accused No.1
AND
The State of Telangana rep. by its
Public Prosecutor, High Court of Telangana at Hyderabad & another, . . Respondents
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
1. ' This Criminal Petition is filed under Section {;, B of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023 seekin<; to quash the proceedings against the petitioner/accused No.1 ir C.C.No.67 of 2018, on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate :,First Class at Peddapalli, registered for the offences punishable rnder Sections 419 and 42O read with 34 of lPC.
2. Heard Mrs.Akua Sunitha, learned counsel for ll e petitioner as well as Sri Jitender Rao Veeramalla, the learned 1., ditional public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent No.1- State I I lFrf':l
2 €rD,j CII.P No.17950-2025
3. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner has limited her prayer seeking a direction to dispense with the appearance of the petitioner before the Trial Court.
4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that appropriate orders may be passed.
5. Perused the record. C.C.No.67 of 2018 is pending on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate of First Class at Peddapalli. Considering the submissions made by both parties and in view of the facts and circumstances of the case, it is deemed appropriate to dispose of the Criminal Petition by dispensing with the appearance of the petitioner before the Trial Court.
6. Hence, the Criminal Petition is disposed of dispensing with the presence of the petitioner before the Trial Court provided that the petitioner is represented through an Advocate on every date of hearing and that he shall be present before the Trial Court whenever his presence is specifically required during the course of trial. 7 . Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. //TRUE COPY// Sd/. L. VIJAYA LAXMI ASSISTANT REGISTRA SECTION OFFICER '1 . The Judicial Magistrate of First Class, At peddapalli, peddaplli Diskict
2. The Station House Officer, Peddapalli police Station, peddapalli, peddapalli District 3 One CC to Mrs. SUNITHA AKULA Advocate [OpUC]
4. Two CCs to Public Prbsecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad [OUT]
5. Two CD Copies To, -r*d
HIGH COURT DATED: 3111212o2s
ORDER
CRLP.No.17950 of 2025 T S ,A Er $ ,(. \ ,i o $g il **l, ert -Z t'' | (:\, -r'\ ii. +. l' o N. q" $, DISPOSING THE CRIMINAL PETITION