WP/40362/2025 of Noor Jahan Begum Vs The State of Telangana on 31 December 2025

1. Noor Jahan Begum, W/o. Late Shaik t\ilohd. Khaja lt4oinuddi!, g-ggd about 70 years, Occ- Se-nior Citizen and Household, Rl/o. H.No.11-571312, Shaheen Nagar, Balapur, Ranga Reddy District - 05.

2. Shaik Mohd. Saleem, S/o. Late Shaik Mohd. Khaja Moinuddin, aged about 50 years, R/o. H.No.1 1-5713/2, Shaheen Nagar, Balapur, Ranga Reddy District -

05.

3. Shabana Begum, D/o. Late Shaik Mohd. Khaja Moinuddin gS99 a!94 ?7 years, Rio. H.No.1 1-5713/2, Shaheen Nagar, Balapur, Ranga Reddy District -

05.

4. Shaheen Begum,, D/olate Shaik Mohd. Khaja Moinuddin, {Oe.d. ap9ut.2:4 years, Rl/o. H No.1 1-5713/2, Shaheen Nagar, Balapur, Ranga Reddy District -

5. Nadeemuddin, D/o Late Shaik Mohd. Khaja lVloinuddrn, aged about 24 years, Rl/o. H.No.'1 1-571312, Shaheen Nagar, Balapur, Ranga Reddy District -05.

6. Naseem Banu, Wio. Shaik Mohammed Saleem aged about 47 years, Occ- House Wife, Rl/o. H.No.11-571312, Shaheen Nagar' Balapur, Ranga Reddy District -05.

7. Javeria Banu, D/o. Shaik Mohammed Saleem W/o. Omer Bin Saleh, aged aged about 24 yea.s, Occ- Housewife, R/o. H.No.'1 1-571312' Shaheen Nagar, Balapur, Ranga ReddY District -05

8. Salman Nawab, S/o. SHaik Mohammed Saleem aged about 2'l years, Occ- Student Rl/o. H.No.1 1-57t312, Shaheen Nagar' Balapur, Ranga Reddy District -05.

9. Sameer Nawab, S/o. Shaik Mohammed Saleem aged about 20 years, Occ- Student, Fl,to. H.No. 11-571312, Shaheen Nagar, Balapur, Ranga Reddy District -05. l0.Sufiyan Nawab, S/o. Shaik Mohammed Saleem aged about 19 years' occ- Student, Ryo. H.No.tt-5713/2, Shaheen Nagar, Balapur, Ranga Reddy.District -05.1Petition"rr 1, 3 to 5 are represehted by their Memorandum^ of Undbrstanding with Sale Power Holder and authorized signatory i.e .2.1d Petitioner i.e."Snait Mohd. Saleem S/o. Late Shaik tvlohd. Khaja Moinuddin, aged about 50 years, Rl/o. H.No. 11-571312' Shaheen Nagar' Balapur' Ranga Reddy District- 05).

AND ...PETITIONERS ) Revenue r lan 1n rt l\,4alakunta rl previously. Reddy District. Ranga Reddy '1 - The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretarl Department, Secretriate, Hyderabad

2. The District Collector, Ranga Reddy District at Kongar a I

3. The Joint Collector, Ranga Reddy District at Kongarah:Ll

4. The Revenu Divisional Officer, Hyderabad East Divrsi,rr Hyderabad.

5. The Deputy Collector, and Tahsildar, Hayathnagar l\lar r Presently Abdullapurmet Mandal, Abdullapurmet, Rang:

6. The VRO, Thattiannaram Village, Abdullapurmet N4an(l,l District.

7. lrilohammed Afzal tt4ohinuddin, S/o. Late Mohd. ft/urad,

8. I',4ohammed Khader lt4ohiuddin, S/o. Late Mohammed t/

9. Fatima Shajee, D/o. Late Mohammed lvlurad,

10. Qutija Soofi, D/o. Late N,4Ohammed lrlurad, 1 '1 .l/ohd. Turabuddin Khusro, S/o. Late lVohammed Murari rrad

12. Lalarukh Umrnahani, D/o. Late fvlohammed Moinuddir .

13. Yagoob ltiloinuddin Tucy, S/o. Late Yagoob Masihuddin ucy 14 Shahana Shujath, D/o. Late MOhammed Shuiath lvloiuci, in

15. Akther Shujath, W/o late Mohd. Shujath lVlohiuddin.

16. Yagoob Shajeeuddin Tucy, S/o. Late lvlohammed I\,4oirru din, 1 7. lt4ehrukh Ummahani, S/o. Late Mohammed Moinuddin,

18. N4aliha Shakeel, D/o. Late Yagoob Ziauddin Tucy.

19. lr4aimona Ummahani, D/o. Late Yagoob Masihuddin Tu :

20. Afreena Mudassir. D/o. Late Yacioob tvlasihuddin Tucy,

21. Ir4ohd. Ahmed Mohiuddin, S/o. Late [Mohammed Ashraf

22. Naseem Tucy, W/o. Late lMasihuddin Tucy,

23. T. Arvind Singh, S/o. T. Harinarayana Singh,

24. T Inindrajeet Singh, S/o. T. Harinarayana Singh,

25. T. Upendranath Singh, S/o. T. Harinarayana Singh,

26. T. Chandra Mohan Singh, S/o. T. Harinarayana Singh,

27. f . Brij Mohan Singh, S/o. T. Harinarayana Singh,

28. f . Vijay Prakash Singh, S/o. T. Harinarayana Singh,

29. T. Surya Pratap Singh, S/o. T. Harinarayana Singh ..Respondents Nos. 7 to 29 are Resident of Thattiannaram Village, Abdullapurmet lvlandal, Ranga Reddy Distric and all are maiors. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ or order more particularly one in the Nature of Writ of Mandaums declaring the action of the 5th Respondent in issuing lmpugned Proceedings No. 81154712016 dated-10- 10-2016 tn favour of the Respondents 7 to 29 in respect of the Petitioners ancestral properties i.e. Lands Covered by Sy No. 118/A extent Ac. 1-09 gts, Sy.No. 118/2A extent Ac.1-09 gts, Sy.No. 119/A extent Ac.0-30 gts, Sy No. 119/2A extent Ac. 0-31 gts, Sy.No. 120lA extent Ac. 7-04 gts and Sy.No.120lAA extent Ac. 7-04 gts, Situated at Tattiannaram Village, Hyathnagar lvlandal Previously, Presently Abdullapurmet Mandal, Ranga Reddy District as illegal, Arbitrary, unjust and against the Provisions of ROR Act 1971 and also against the Dictim of Chinnam Pandurangam Vs Mandal Revenue Officer Serilingampally Mandal reported in 2007 (6) ALT 134 (FB) and without any notice on the petitioners and in gross violation of Principles of Natural Justice and Arbitrary capricious and violative of Article 14, 19 and 3004 of Conslitution of lndia and set aside the same. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the lmpugned Proceedings No. B/1 547/20'16 dated:10-10-2016 issued by the Respondents 5 & 6 in respect of the Petitioner ancestral properties i.e. Lands Covered by Sy No. 118/A extent Ac. 1-09 gts, Sy.No. 118/2A extent Ac.1-09 gts' Sy.No. 119/A extent Ac.0-30 gts, Sy.No. 119/2A extent Ac. 0-31 gts, Sy.No. 120/A extent Ac. 7-04 gts and Sy.No.120/AA extent Ac. 7-04 gts, Situated at Tattiannaram Village, Hyathnagar Mandal Previously, Presently Abdullapurmet Mandal, Ranga Reddy District pending disposal of the above writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI AMARAGANI MALSOOR GOUD

Counsel for the Respondents No 1 To 6: SRI L. RAVINDEII AGP FOR II:VENUE Counsel for the Respondents No 7 To 29: --- The Court made the following: ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT T'OR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V.VENUCTOPAL IVRIT PETITION No.40362 of 2025 Dated: 31.L2.2025 Between: Smt. Noor Jahan Begum and nine others . . . Petitioners And The State ofTelangana, Represented by its Principal Secretary and twenty eight others .RDER "' ResPondents This Writ Petition is Iiled under Article 226 of Constitution of India seeking the following reiief/s:- "... to issuc a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of 5,h ' Respondent in issuing Impugned Proceedings No.B/ l5a7 12016 dated 10.10.2016 in favour of the Respondents 7 to 29 in respect of the Petitioners ancestral properties i,e. Lalds Covered by Sy No-118/A extent Ac.l.O9 gts, Sy.No.i18/2A extent Ac.1.O9 gts, Sy.No.l19/A extent Ac.O.3O gts, Sy.No. I19 /2A exLent Ac.O.31 gt, Sy.No.120lA extent Ac.7.O4 gts and Sy.No. 120/AA extent Ac.7.O4 gts, Situated at Tattiannaram Village, Hyathnagar Mandal Previously, Presently Abdullapurmet Mandal, Ranga Reddy District as illegal, Arbitraqr, unjust and against tehProvisions of ROR Act 1971 and also against the Dictim of Chinnam Pardura;rgam Vs Mandal Revenue Ofhcer erilingampally Mandal reported in 2OO7 (6) ALT 134 (FB) and without any notice on the petitioners and in gross violaLion of Principles of violative of Natural Justice and Arbitrary capricious and violative of Article 14, 19 & 300-,{ of Constitution of India and set aside the same and to pass such other Order or Orders ..."

3. _" ,"*O ,:|:aragani Malsoor Goud, learned counsel for the petitioners arrd Mr.L.Ravinder, Iearned Assistant

Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for r :spondent Nos. 1 to 6. Perused t['re record

3. Learnccl oounsel for the petitioners u'cr 1d submit that respondent No.5 has issued the impugrL d proceedings No.B/ 1547 l2016, dated 10.10.2016 to the unofhcial respondent s rIl respect of the aflcestra-i p r rperties of the petitioners, u,ithout putting them on notice, vhich is illegal, arbitrary, rrnltrst arld against the provision; of Telalgana Riglrts in Land and Pattadar Passbooks Act. l97I (for short the 'Act, 197 l) Aggrieved by r.vhich, th ' present writ petition is liLed ar-rd he would seek to pz ss appropriate orders

4. On the other hand, learned Assisttt Lt Government Pleader would submit that the petitioners Iave signed on the impugned proceedings, which was issur C way back on 10.10.2016. The petitioners have hled this 'r rit petition at a belated stagc, after a lapse of nine long ye::s. Hence, the present writ petition is misconceived ald t; eks to dismiss the same J

5. Having regard to submissions of both the learned counsel arrd on perusal of the material available on record, this Court, without making any observations, on the merits or demerits of the case, deems it appropriate to direct the petitioners to fiIe an application before the appropriate authority since the petitioners rushed to this Court after exhausting the remedy of hiing an appeal.

6. Accordingly, this Writ petition is disposed of gralting liberty to the petitioners to work out the remedies as available under law. No costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaaeous petitions, if any, pending in the Writ Petition sha_ll stand closed. To, SD/.M. OSMAN ALI BAIG ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER I . The Principal Secretary to Revenue Department' State of Telangana' Secretriat6, HYderabad

2. TheDistrictCollector,RangaReddyDistrictatKongarakalan.

3. The Joint Collector, Ranga Reddy District at Kongarakalan'

4. The Revenu Divisional Officer, Hyderabad East Division at Malakunta' Hyderabad. I I

\

5. The Deputy Collector, and Tahsildar, Hayathnagar Mar Presently Abdullapurmet [,4andal, Abdullapurmet, Ran;

6. The VRO, Thattiannaram Village, Abdullapurmet Manrl District.

7. One CC to SRI AI\,4ARAGANI MALSOOR GOUD, AdvocII

8. Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE ,High Court for the S I Hyderabad . [OUT]

9. Two CD Copies DAN lal previously, r Reddy District. l, Ranga Reddy : [OPUC] rte of Telangana at W,, lj I I I

HIGH COURT DATED:31 11212025

ORDER

WP.No.40362 ot 2025 'i i i::l i_! $ ) L]d! |!l .\ DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS

n- t i I s