Telangana High Court
WP/23966/2025 of Koneru Shanti Vs Registrar (Recruitment) on 31 December 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECET/BER ' TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM KOSHY AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUDDALA CHALAPATHI RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 23966 OF 2025
[ 348s ]
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECET/BER '
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM KOSHY
AND
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUDDALA CHALAPATHI RAO
WRIT PETITION NO: 23966 OF 2025
Between:
Koneru Shanti, D/o Koneru Ganesh aged about 31 Years, Otfice Subordinate, (under the order of removal) 0lo Citv Small Causes Court, Hyderabad, Through ine Additionat Rent Controller. City Sma'l Causes Cou(, Secunderabad R/o H.
No 20-531, Dayanadnagar, Ekalavayanagar, Malkajgiri Telangana
...PETITIONER
AND
Registrar (Recruitment), Honourable High Court for the State oF Telangana, Hyderabad.
The Chief Judge, City Small Causes Court, Hyderabad The Additional Rent Controller, City Small Causes Court' Secunderabad.
, ..RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith' the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order, or Direction, more particularly a Writ in the nature of Mandamus, declaring the action of the 2nd Respondent in imposing the major penalty of removal from service, pursuant to the impugned proceedings bearing No. Proc. Dis No. 393/202s/ADMN/CSCC/RE-OS
(2023yP.R. No. 1412024, as arbitrary, illegal, erroneous' and violative of Article 14
of the Constitution of lndia, and consequently set aside the said proceedings'
Further, be pleased to hold that the Petitioner is entitled to reinstatement into service with all consequential benefits.
c
.i:_ !'r!:.Fq----1t7
lA NO: 1 OF 2025
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the ( rcurnstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Courl tr ry be pleased to direct the Respondents tc reinstate the Petitioner into service, \ thout reference to the imcugned proceeoings bearing No. Proc Dis. No.3g3/2(l,l /AD M N/CSCC/ RE-OS
(2023)/P. R No 1412024
Counsel for the Petitioner :SRl D. SUDHARSHAN
Counsel forthe Respondents: SRI A. NAREN RUDRA, S-lr NDING COUNSEL
The Court made the following: ORDER
t-a
IN TItE IITGII COTJRT FOR THE, STATE 0F T[]LAN(;ANA AT YDERABT\D
TI{E I{ONOI.IRABI,E SI{I .IUSTICI], P.SAM KOSHl'
.\Nl)
l Hli HON-OL I{Al}l.E SRI .Itrs'l l('E StiDt)ALA ( tL\L.APA IItl RAo WRII' PETII'lON No.23966 of 2025
Date: -'11.12.2025
llctu ccn:
Kone ru Shanti
[)ctitioncr
And
Rcgistrar ( [(ecru itrncnt ).
I Ion'hlc [{ig.h ( our1 fbr thc Statc of I elangana.
I Ivdcrabad and othcrs.
. . . Respondertts
()Rl)ER' (pcr lton'hlc '\ri .lustica I'Sunt. Kosh.t.)
I Icard Mr- D. Sudharshan. lcanlcd cottl.tscl lirr tllc pctitioncr artd Mr.A.Narett Rudra. learncd Standirrg Counscl lirr rcspondr:nt Ntls. I to i aud lrcrused thr: rccord.
2.
1'odal . u'hen thc matter is takcrl-up lirr hcaring. learned Standing.
( ounsel appcaring lbr thc respondonts. produced an order signcd by thc Rcgistrar (Aclministration) f .n.C. Registrar (Recruitmertt).
tlatctl 29. 12.2]l-5, ,,r,hereby, it has hcen conveved that thc rcspoltdcnts havc reconsiticrcd thc clairn of the pctititlnct ott hcr reprossntatiou that she rnade and on duc consideration of' the represcntation. thc
l)cplrtnlent has decided to ttrke ircr back in scrrice Since thc ordcr'
tlatc'tl 29.11.2025. produced to the Ctturl, rvtts not [rappill' rrorded'
I
l
Pcndi irg rrri:ccl llncoirs allplicriions if an1. shall : rntl closctl.
Sd/.A.JAYASREE
AS I ISTANT REGISTRAR
hring on rccortl lodal itsclf that dull' prepared or t,'r shos'inp tlte rlccision thlt thc rcsporrrlcnts huvc takcn on thc- rcl.l'r. 'lrlatiorl tl'3t thc pct it ioncr h rrs tl l rtir In tclrrr: ol'lltc tlccision Lhat thc rcspotrdents 't r c [akcn. rrc arc ol thc consrtlcred opinion that nothing lurther rcmai r in thc prcsent \\'rit I)etititrn. I it tlte Pctitii,ncr-r'el)()l't {o licr dutr intn,, .iiate lv ir1 t.r'nts ol llre (lrdl'r (lalc(l 1., ll.l0li
Lct rc\ i.cJ ()r(lcr hr'producctl Io thc Court Ol'li, r totllr so irs to cnablc lrel t(, annr\ t[)e sanlc in thc bLirrdle oiWril Pct iti n lcarncd Standinq L'ounscl appearing tirr thc resporrtlcr I \\'as direcLetl to
-.\ccorttin!lr. Ihc Writ I'ctition stands disposecl t,f Ihcre shrrll l.rc tto clrder as t() co5t:
!.-./
To,
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
1 Registrar (Recruitment), Honourable High Court for th€ ita[e of Telangana, Hyderabad.
2. The Chief Judge, City Small Causes Court, Hyderabad
3. The Additionzr Rent Controller, City Small Causes Cou- Secunderabad.
4 One CC to SRI D SUDHARSHAN, Advocate IOPUC]
5- One CC to SRI A, NAREN RUDRA, STANDING COLJIJ ,EL [OPUC]
6. Two CD Copres
i
Dr\N
P N{K
i
HIGH COURT
DATED:31 11212025
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
WP.No.23966 of 2025 DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS A,b t a( IA s E (, rl
I tt r) I
k is * 2i I