Telangana High Court
CRP/1545/2021 of Mohd. Azeed Vs M/s. Srinidhi Chits (Hyderabad) (P) Ltd., on 31 December 2025
COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEIUBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 1545 OF 2021 Petition Under Article 227 of the Constitution of lndia against the order
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
WEDNESDAY,THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEIUBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 1545 OF 2021
Petition Under Article 227 of the Constitution of lndia against the order dated 11-02-2021 made in E.P.No. 72 ol 2021 in Arbitration Award No. 366 of 2018 on the file of Xl Junior Civil Judge, City Civil Court at Secunderabad.
Between:
Mohd. Azeed, S/o. IVlohd. Peer, Aged 38 yrs., Occu- Teacher, R/o. H. No. 1-2-100, Markandeya Nagar, Jagitial District.
..PETITIONER/ JDR
AND
'1 . I\//s. Srinidhi Chits (Hyderabad) (P) Ltd.,, Rep. by its Foreman, Sri V. Laxma Reddy, S/o. V. Narasimha Reddy, Aged 30 yrs., Occu- Authorised Signator, R/o. Kharkhana, Secunderabad. Having its Reg. office- SRR Arcade, Near Thirumalagherry Chowrasta, Secunderabad-'1 5.
2. The I\,4andal Educational Officer, Sarangapur, Jagitial District.
3. Nagabhushanam, S/o. Rajanarsu, Aged 37 yrs., Occu- Business, RJo. H.No.
2-2-73, \N eekly t\,4arket, Jagitial.
4. G. Krishna, S/o. Rajalingam, Aged 37 yrs., Occu- Business, Fl/o. H.No. 1-2- 22211, Bypass Road, Krishna lVlagar, Jagitial.
5. K. Ramesh, S/o. Bhoomaiah, Aged 37 yrs., Occu- Business, Rl/o. H.No. 1-63, Buggaram, Jagitial.
6. M. Harish, S/o. laxminarayana, Aged 34 yrs., Occu- Business, Rl/o. H.No. 3-2- '1 15, Puranipet, Jagitial. (Respondent No. 3 to 6 are not necessary parties in this C.R.P.)
...RESPONDENTS
lA NO: 2 OF 2021
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings in E.P. No- 72 of 2021 in Arbitration Award No. 366
of 2018 dated '1 1lo2l2021 on the file of Xl Junior Civil Judge, C.C.C. at Secunderabad, pending disposal of CRP otherwise the petitioner would be put irreparable loss and harm.
lA NO: 1 OF 2021
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the cir iumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Cou.'r may be pleased to dispense with the Certified copy of order copy dated 1 11021,/ ):21 and E.p. petition in E. P. No 72 of 2021 in Arb. Award No. 366 of 2O1B on th: file of Xl Junior Civil Judge, C.C.C. at Secunderabad.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. K V SUBBA REDDy Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1 & 2: NONE APPEARE l The Court made the following ORDER:
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA
CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.1545 OF 2O2I
Datez 31.12.2025
Between:
Mohd. Azeed
.. .Petitioner
AND
M/s. Srinidhi Chits(Hyderabad)(P) Ltd., and others
...Respondents
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
Today rvhen the matter has come up before this Court for hearing, Sri K.V.Subba Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the adjudication and has become infructuous
2. In vierv of the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, this Cir.il Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs Miscellaneous petitions, if any are pending, sha11 stand dismissed Sd/. B. REKHA RANI SISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// To, The Xl Junior Civil Judge, City Civil Court at Sec nd rabad One CC to SRl. K V SUBBA REDDY Advocate I Two CD Copies cause in the Civil Revision Petition does not survive for further
J kul/kam o P cl ECTION OFFICER
HIGH COURT DATED:.3111212025
ORDER
CRP.No.1545 of 2O21 DISMISSING THE CIVIL REVISION PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS I ( ( )' I lHE S rA oo Itsno,-r' '..--,::= fl )r7q
Irt lr J t:C 3u 9,L