Telangana High Court
CRLP/17043/2025 of Vennached Nandeesh, Vs The State of Telangana on 31 December 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 17043 OF 2025 Between: Vennached Nandeesh, S1o Late Vennached Mahesh, Aged about 23 years, Occ. Student, Rio H.No.3-36/D, lppaipally
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 17043 OF 2025
Between:
Vennached Nandeesh, S1o Late Vennached Mahesh, Aged about 23 years, Occ.
Student, Rio H.No.3-36/D, lppaipally Village, Tirmalapur Post, Kulkacherla Mandal, Vikarabad District, Telangana - 509335.
...Petitioner
AND
'1 . The State of Telangana, Rep by its Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana Hyderabad.
2. The Superintendent of Police, Vikarabad District Polrce, Telangana - 501101.
3. The Circle lnspector of Police, Parigi, Vikarabad District, Telangana - 509335.
4. The Station House Officer, Kulkacherla Police Station, Vikarabad District, Telangana - 50933.
...Respondents
Petition under Section 482 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant anticipatory bail to the Petitioner in Crime No. 69 of 2025 on the file of P.S. Kulkacherla, Vikarabad District, in the event of his arrest in the'
above said crime.
Thrs Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri M. Keshav Yadav, Advocate for the Petitioner and the Sri D. Arun Kumar, Additional Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondents.
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE K. SUJANA
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT
HYDERABAD
THE HONOUITABLE SMT. JUSTICE K. SUJANA
CRIMINAL PETITION No. 17O43 of 2O25
DATE:31.12.2O25
Be twee n:
Vennachcd Nandccsh
Petitioner
AND
The State of Telangana,
Rep by its Public Prosecutor,
High Court for the Sta[e of Telangana,
Hyderabad and threc o[hers
Respondents
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
The Criminal l)etition is filed under Section 482 of BNSS praying this Court to grant pre-arrest bail to the petilioner/ accused No.4 in Crime No.69 of 2025 before the Kulkacherla Police Station, Vikarabad District, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 329(4), 304 ol the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2o23 (BNS). I I I *-t
2. The case of the prosecution is that the de-facto complainant lodged a report bclore the Police on 06.04.2025 stating that his wife u,ent to the temple due to the Sri Ramanavami festival in his village. At that time, he called his wife, but the phone was not lifted, and again he tried calling his wife, as the phone call was not lifted. I'{e went to the house and saw that his u ile was in an unconscious position and blood was around hcr neck, and he did not find his wife's gold mangalsutra cord. Then he suspected that unknown accused persons entered into the bedroom and committed theft of his wife's gold mangalsutra cord. As such, he requested the Police to register the crime. Based on the complaint, the police registered a crime against the petitioner.
3. Heard Sri M. Keshav Yadav, learned counsel for petitioner, and Sri D. Arun Kumar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for respondents - State.
4. The contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner is innocent of the allegations ald has been falsely implicated in the case and that the entire I II I
investigation is completed and the charge sheet has also been filcd. As such, he requested the Court to grant bail to the petitioner.
5. On the other hand, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor opposed the submissions made by the learned counsel for the pe titioners, contending that the allcgations allainst the petitioner are serious in nature and that thcre are specific allegations against the petitioner herein. Therelore, he is not entitlcd to bail. Previously, the petitioner herein filed three anticipatory bail applications, and the same were dismissed by this Court, and there are no changed circumstances to cntertain the present petition. As such, requested the Court to dismiss the criminal petition.
6. Considering the submissions made by both the parties and the material available on record, this is the 4e anticipatory bail petition filed by the petitioner without any changed circumstances. Mere filing of the charge sheet is not a ground to consider the application of the petitioner. In view I I
'i of the serious allegations against the petitioner, the petitioner is not entitled to bai1.
Accordingly, this Criminal Petition is dismissed' Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed Sd/- A.H.S.GOWRI SHANKAR ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY' SECTiON OFFICER To,
1. The Station House Officer, Kulkacherla Police Station, Vikarabad District.
2. Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUT]
3. One CC to Sri M. Keshav Yadav, Advocate [OPUC]
4. Two CD Copies KamlPR w /
HIGH COURT DATED:31 112!2425
ORDER
GRLP.No.17043 of 2025 DISMISSING OF THE CRIMINAL PETITION frs zzl,lzG s HE
( C)o 'aq\ f- .c) 0 2 H:B 2026 * * PIiT 6;\ c