Telangana High Court
WP/40305/2025 of Patakula Buchhi Ramulu Vs The State of Telangana on 31 December 2025
THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRIJUSTICE E.V. VENUGOPAL WRIT PETITION NO: 40305 0F 2025 Patakula Buchhi Ramulu, S/o. Hanmanthu, Aged about 56
[ 32991
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRIJUSTICE E.V. VENUGOPAL
WRIT PETITION NO: 40305 0F 2025
Patakula Buchhi Ramulu, S/o. Hanmanthu, Aged about 56 years, Occ:
Agriculture, R/o. 3-81, Katikenpally Village,Dharmaram Mandal, Karimnagar District - 500092.
...PETITIONER
D
1. The State of Telangana, Rep by its Principal Secretary, Department of Revenue, Secretariat, Hyderabad
2. The District Collector, Peddapalli District.
3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Peddapalli Division. Peddapalli District
4. The Tahsildar, Peddapalle Mandal, Peddapalli District
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 ot the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed ttrerewith, the High Court may be pleased to lssue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus, declaring the inaction of the Respondents, and more particularly of Respondent No.3 herein, in not acting upon the Petitioner's online application dated 16.05.2025 (Application No. 2500029871), seeking immediate and consequential amendment of the Record of Rights and issuance of an updated Pattadar Passbook-cum-Title Deed in respect of land admeasuring Ac.1-O2 guntas in Sy. No. 6641311i111, Peddapalle Urban, Peddapalle Mandal, Peddapalli District (the Subject Property), as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Sections 5(5) and 5(7) of the Telangana Bhu Bharati (Record of Rights in Land) Act, 2024 and Articles 14,226 and 300-4 of the Constitution of lndia and c,rnsequently direct Respondent No.3 and Respondent No.4 to forthwith carry out the necessary correction in the digital Record of Rights so as to show the F'etitioner by name as pattadar and possessor for the entire extent of Ac.1-02 Gts n Sy. No 664/3/1/1/1 , and to issue in favour of the Petitioner an updatec Pattadar Passbook-cum-Title Deed reflecting the said extent.
IA NO: 'f OF 2025
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased, pending dispr>sal of the Writ Petition, Direct Respondent No.3 to forthwith consider and dispose of the Petitioner's online application dated 16.05.2025
(Application No. 2500029871) by passing a reasoned, speaking order within a fixed time frane, not exceeding four weeks from the date of receipt of this Hon'ble Court'r; order, and to communicate the result thereof to the Petitioner.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI K. RAGHAVA RAMANA
Counsel forthe Respondents: SRI L. RAVINDER, AGP FOR REVENUE
The Court maole the following: ORDER
IN THE HIG.H COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELAIVGANA
AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V.VENUGOPAL
WRIT PETITION No.4O3OS of 2025
Dated: 3L.72.2O25.
Between:
Patakula Buchhi Ramulu
... Petitioner
And
The State of Telangana,
Represented by its Principal Secretar5r, Department of Revenue and three others
.. . Respondents
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India seeking the following relief/s:- u... to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of a Writ of Mandarnus, declaring the inaction of the Respondents, and more particularly of Respondent No 3 herein, in not acting upon the Petitioner's online application dated 16.O5.2025 (Application No.2500O2987 7), seeking immediate and consequential amendment of the Record of Rights and issuance of an updated Pattadar Passbook-cum-Title Deed in respect of land admeasuring Ac.1.O2 guntas in Sy.No.664/3lllLll Peddapalle Urban, Peddapalle Mandal, Peddapalli District (the "Subject Propert5r"), as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Sections 5(5) and 5(7) of the Telangana Bhu Bharati (Record of Rights in Land) Act,2024 and Articles 14,226 and 300-A of the Constitution of India; and consequently direct Respondent No.3 and Respondent No.4 to forthwith carry out the necessary correction in the digital Record of Rights so as to show the Petitioner by narne as pattadar and possessor for the entire extent of Ac.1.02 Gts in Sy '1o.664131 | I 1/ 1 and to issue in favour of the .)etitioner an updated Pattadar Passbook-cum- 'title Deed reflecting the said extent ..."
2. Heerd Mr.K.Raghava Ramana, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr.L.Ravinder, learned Assistant Government Pleader fcr Revenue appearing for respondents. Perused the record
3. Lea:'ned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is the absolute owner of the land admeasuring Acs.Ol.Oi; guntas 1n Sy.No.664l3l L/ ll L, situated at Peddapalli Urban, Peddapalli Manda1 and District, having purchase,l the same from one P.Sambaiah by way of a simple sale deed. Learned counsel for the petitioner would further submit that, the narne of the petitioner was incorporai-ed in all the revenue records. However, the n€une of the petitioner was not corrected in the online Record of Rights. As such, he made online Application No.25OOOil987L, dated L6.O5.2O25 for amendment of the Record of Rights and issuance of an updated pattadar ! passbook-cum-title deed in his favour. The grievance of the petitioner 1S \ tI representation, respondent No.3 did not consider the same.
4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue submits that appropriate orders would be passed in due course of time and seeks to dismiss this writ petition.
5. Having regard to the submissions of both the learned counsel, this Court without making any observations on the merits or demerits of the case, is inclined to direct respondent Nos.3 and 4 to examine the online Application No.2500029871, dated 16.O5.2025 submitted by the petitioner and pass appropriate orders, as expeditiously as possible within a period of (90) days. from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, strictly in accordance with la',r,, by putting the interested parties on notice and affording them sufficient opportunity of hearing. 6- with the above direction, this writ Petition is disposed that, even after receipt of the said of. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, misceflaneous petitions, if arty, pending in the Writ Petition shall stand closed. SD/-P. PONNA KRISHNA T REGISTRAR //TRUE COPYII OFFICER BS I To,
1. The Principal secretary, Department of Revenue, state of relangana, Secretariat, Hyderabad
2. The District Collector, peddapalli District. 3' The Revenue Divisional Officer, Peddapalli Division. peddapalli District 4- The Tahsildar, peddapaile Mandar, peddapalli District
5. one cc to SRr K. RAGHAVA RAMANA, Advocate [opUC] 6' Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE ,High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad . [OUT]
7. Two CD ()opies DAN
HIGH COURT DATED:l! 111212025 .s' 'JF T=i c) (j 0 I tiB 2026 r,) WP.No.40305 of 2025 DTSPOSIIIG OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS -). * i> \ 0
%