Telangana High Court
CRLP/17052/2025 of Avinash alias Vikash Jadhav, Vs The State of Telangana on 31 December 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE THIRW FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER, TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE K. SUJANA Between: Avinash @ vikash Jadhav, s/o Pandry, Age: 21 years, caste: Marati, occ: pvt. Job, R/o H. No. 13-1-592, Dilawar
I s38s I
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
WEDNESDAY, THE THIRW FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER, TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE K. SUJANA
Between:
Avinash @ vikash Jadhav, s/o Pandry, Age: 21 years, caste: Marati, occ: pvt.
Job, R/o H. No. 13-1-592, Dilawar Gunj, Dulpet, Hyderabad N/o Near subhas Chowk Railway Gate, Bhalki (T), Bidar District, Karnataka State 80886122726
Aadhar No: 4348-8481 -2593.
(Accused No.2)
AND
...petitioner/Accused No.2
The State of Tetangana, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor Through SHO of p.S.
Sham irpet Medchal-Malkajgiri District.
...RespondenUcomplainant
Petition under Section 480 & 483 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminll petition, the High Court may be pleased to enlarge the Petitioner/ Accused on Regular Bail in crime No. 642 of 202s, dated 19-67-2025 on the file of sHo, p.s. shamirpet, Medchal-Malkajgiri District and release the Petitioner/ Accused No.2 on such terms and conditions.
This Petition coming on for. hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of criminar petilion ,ng ,pon"rreiring'tne arguments of sri shaik Karimulla' Advocate for the Petitioner "nJ-n"'sri o. Arun Kumar, Additional Public Prosecutor on behar or *re sorc n""ponJ",ii.
The Court made the foflowing: ORDER
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT
HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE K. SUJANA
CRIMINAL PETITION No. L7O52 of 2ol25
DATE: 3L.L2.2O25.
Between::
Avinash () Vikash Jadhav
Petitioner/Accused No.2
nIITD
The State cf Telangana,
Rep. by its Public Prosecutor,
Through SHO of P.S. ShamirPet,
Medchal-M alkajgiri District
ResPondent / ComPlainan t
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
This Crirninal Petition is fited under Section 48O & 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita' 2023 by the petitioner/eLccused No'2 seeking his. enlargement on bait in Crime No.542 of 2025 of Shameerpet Police Station' Cyberabad,)istrict.Theoffencesallegedagainstthepetitioner is under Section 8 (c) read with 2O(bXilXC)' 27l l and Section 2gotthelrlarcoticDrugsandPsychotropicSubstancesAct' 1985 (for short 'NDPS ActJ' \
2. The case of the prosecution is that' on 19'07 '2025' oo reliableinformation,thePolicecond'uctedaraidandfound accused Nos. 1 to 3 along with 4L'7g7 kg of ganja' Basing on [hesame,thePoliceregisteredacaseagainstthepetitionerfor the above said offences'
3. Heard Sri Shaik Karimulla' learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri D' Arun Kumar' learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent-State'
4. Thecontentionofthelearnedcounselforthepetitioner is that the oetitioner is in jail since lg'O7 '2025 and the materia[partoftheinvestigationisalreadycompleted.As such,herequestedtheCourttograntbailtothepetitioner.
5. On the other hand, learned Additional Public Prosecutor opposed the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, contending that the petitioner is a habitual offender and had previously been indulged in similar offences ui-d"e crime Nos.3 L of 202\ and 259 of 2016. Therefore, he prayed the Court to dismiss the criminal petition. &
6' In the fight of the submissions made by both the Iearned counsel and upon perusal of the material available on record, it is observed that the pedtioner has been in judicial custody since 19'07'2025 and the aregadon is that the petitiont:r is a habifual offender and is continuously involved in NDps cases. Hence, this court is not incrined to grant bail to the pefitioner.
Miscellaneous stand closed. Acc:ordingly, this Criminal petition is dismissed. lo Petitions, if any, pending shall sd/- L. LAKSHMI BABU DEPUTY /TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER at Medchal. Cyberabad State of Telangana at 1 The VllAdditional Judiciat Magistrate of First
2. The Station l{ouse Officer, Snirirp"t police Comissionerate.
\ J HIGH COUR DATED:31l,1212425 cRLP.No.17052 ot 2025 DIEt[IEFil THE CRIMINAL tE ,r ( THE S 1 I [r8 202 C' -t- E * F G a v