CMA/478/2025 of M/s. RayalaVamshi Krishna Educational Society, Vs Additional Commissioner and Regional Director, on 31 December 2025

134421

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD

WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE RENUKA YARA

t.A. NO.4 0F 202s

IN/AND

CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS

NO: 478 OF 2025

Appeal Under Section 82 of Employees State lnsurance Act, 1948 against the orders dated 08.07.2025 in EIC No.61 of 202O on the file of the Court of the Hon'ble Employees lnsurance Court and Chairman lndustrial-l at Hyderabad.

Between:

M/s. Rayala Vamshi Krishna Educational Society, (century High School), Near Jammibanda Park, Khammam - 507002.Telangana. Rep by its Board Member D

Nithin Krishna

...APPELLANTS

AND

1. Additional Commissioner& Regional Director, ESI Corporation, 5-9-23, Hillfort Road, Adarshnagar,Hyderabad - 500063.

2. Peputy Director, ESI Corporation, 5-9-23, Hitlfort Road, Adarshnagar, Hyderabad - 500 063.

3. The Recovery Officer, ESI Corporation, 5-9-23, Hillfort Road, Adarshnagar, Hyderabad - 500063.

...RESPONDENT/S

IA NO: 2 OF 2025

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to condone the delay of (87) days in preferring appeal againit orders dated 08-07.2025 passed by the Hon'ble Employees tnsurance Court and Chairman lndustrial Tribunal-1, at Hyderabad in EIC No. 61 OF 2020.

|.A.NO: 3 OF' 2O2s

Petition under Section 151 CPC piaying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant an intt:rim stay all further proceedings in B5-B of ESI Act order dated.

17.O8.2020 for Rs.S,11,9541- tilt pending disposal of the main appeal.

lA NO: 4 OF 1r-025

Between

M/s. Raya aVamshi Krishna Educational Society, (Century High School), Near JammibanrJa Park. Khammam - 507002.Telangana. Rep by its Board Member D

Nithin Kristrna

... PETITION ERS/APP E LLANTS

AND

1. Additional Commissioner & Regional Director, ESI Corporation, 5-9-23, Hillfort Road, ACarshnagar,Hyderabad - 500063.

2. Deputy Director, ESI Corporation, 5-9-23, Hillfort Road, Adarshnagar, Hyderabad - 500 063.

3. The Recovery Officer, ESI Corporation, 5-9-23, Hillfort Road, Adarshnagar, Hyderab;ad - 500063.

...RESPONDENTS/ RESPONDENTS

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file'J in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased permit the petitioner to participate into the New Amnesty Scheme, 2025 introduced by the Responden': Corporation to settle the dispute in between petitioner and the respondent corproration pending before this Hon'ble Court with a liberty to contest the matter in cerse the matter is not settled in between petition and respondent corporation undt:r the New Amnesty Scheme, 2025.

Counsel for the Appellant: Sri. N Vinesh Rai Counsel for the Respondents: Sri. Pasham Srinivasulu The Court made the following: ORDER

IN THE COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD

THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE RENUI(A YARA

I.A.No.4 of 2o25

!sls44

CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL No:478 of 2o.25

31sr DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025

Iletw'een:

I\4/s. Ital,ala Varnshi Krishna Edurcational Society

..Appellant

Aclditio,al Cour,rissioner & Itegio'al Director and 2 others . . Respondents 1'

This appear is preferred aggrieved by the order passed b1', .the rearnecr Emproyees lnsurance court and chairman, lnclustriirl Tribunal_I at Hyderabad (for short ,E.I.Court) in E.l.C.N._r.6 I of 2020, dated OB.OT.2O2S.

and

2.

Heard Sri N

appellant/ peritioner

. Vine.sh Raj, learned counsel for the

ancl Sri pashani Srinivasulu, learned

counsel for responderrts_corporation.

3'

The appellant herein fired E.I.c.No.61 0f 2020 under Section 75 (1) (s) c,f E.s.r. Act before the E.I.court seeking to set /

2

aside B5-B order dated 17.OB.2O2O for Rs.S, 11,9541- and to declare the appellant not liable to pay interest and damages to the respronclents-ESl Corporation. Vide impugnecl order, the E.l.Court dismissed the said petition with costs directing the appellanttopal'damagesatRs'5,11'9541-totherespondents- corporaticn. Aggrieved by the same' the present CMA is filed'

4.

Dutring pendency of the CMA' the learned counsel for theappellernthasfiledl.A.No.4of2o,2Sseekingpermissionto participate in the Ner'r' Amnesty Scheme' 2025 used by the respondents-corporationforsettlingdisputebetweenthe appellantandrespondents-corporationwithlibertytocontest thematterinCt].SethedisputeisnotsettledintheNer,r,Amnesty Scheme,20"25'

5.

The learned counsel for the respondents-corporation opposed- the appeal alleging that the ESIC New Amnesty Scheme 2o2]isapplicabletoCaSeSrn,hicharefiledbefore31.03.2025.

6.Inrellly,thellearnedcotrnselfortheappellantsubmitted that the E.I.rl.No.6 | or 2020 was initiated before the E'r'courr intheyear2020andsaidCaServasPefldingwhenttr.eNew \mnestv scrrerne, 2o2511,2ss introduced' rt is furtYrer subrnit'ted ./

I

t

II

_)

that said scheme is applicable even to disputes involved in appeals.

7.

As per Ner.r, Amnesty Scheme, 2025, a copy which is producecl b-v the appellant, said scheme is applicable to cases 'i'hich are filed up to 31.03.2025. That being the case, the E.I.c u'hich is filed in the year 2o2o is also covered under the scheme irrespective of the ract that the same was disposed of vide impugned order in the month of the July 2025.

B.

In the

eMA is also di

rn ther Nelv..Arn

,.,

to costs.

closed.

result, the I.A.No.4 of 2O2S is allowed and the sposed of permitting the appellant to participate nesty Scheme, 2025. There shall be no order as Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, sfiqll stand //TRUE COPYII

sd/-

n, lndustrial Tribunal_f at

OFFICER

To

w

_t

I

HIGH COURT

DATED t:1111212025