Telangana High Court
CRLP/17921/2025 of Qumar Begum, Vs The State of Telangana, on 31 December 2025
FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA cRIMINAL P TITIOE NO: 17921 OF 2025 Between: Qumar Begum, W/o. Late. Shaik Jaleel, Age 55 Years, Occ. House Hold, R/o. H.No. 12-5-157, Bhagath Colony, Arsapally, Nizambad - 503 186. The
WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA
cRIMINAL P TITIO
E
NO: 17921 OF 2025
Between:
Qumar Begum, W/o. Late. Shaik Jaleel, Age 55 Years, Occ. House Hold, R/o.
H.No. 12-5-157, Bhagath Colony, Arsapally, Nizambad - 503 186.
The State of Telangana,, Rep
Hyderabad - 500 066.
...Petitioner/Accused- 4
AND
by its Public Prosecutor, High Court Buildings,
2. Smt. Kupriyala Jyothi, Wo.Venkati @ Ajmal Khan, Age 28 Years, Occ. House Wife, R/o 10-3-132, Shivaji Nagar, Nizambad - 503 00'1. (De-Facto Complainant)
...Respondents
Petition under Section 528 of BNSS 2023 praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to Dispense the Presence of the Petitioner in the SC.SPL No. 86/2025
under Sec 85, 115 (1), 118(1), 292 & 351(2) of 8NS,2023 and Sec 3(1)(r)(s) of SC
and ST PoA Act 1989, pending on the File of the Special Judge for Trial of Cases Under SC/ST PoA Act, Nizambad District at Nizambad This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Mr SYED AHMED, Advocate for the Petitioner and Mr. JITHENDER RAO VEERAMALLA, the Additional Public Prosecutor on behalf of Respondent No.1 and none appeared for the Respondent No.2
The Court made the following: ORDER
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA // AT HYDERABAD
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
THE HON'BLE SMT.JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA
CRIMINAL PETITION No.17921 o12025
Date;3'l.12.2025
Between:
Qumar Begum
.. . Petitioner/Accused No.4
And
State of Telangana,
Rep. by the Public Prosecutor,
High Court for the State of Telangana,
Hyderabad and another
Respondents
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
This criminal petition is filed by the petitioner-accused No.4 seeking to quash the proceedings against them in SC Spl. No.86 of 2025 on the flle of the Special Judge for trial of cases under SC/ST (PoA) Act, Nizamabad, Nizamabad District, registered for the offences under Sections 85, 115(1),292 & 351(2) of BNS and Section 3(1Xr)(s) of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 2015 (for short 'SC & ST Act').
2. Heard Mr. Syed Ahmed, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.Jithender Rao Veeramalla, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the respondent No. 1 -State .1. \.
3 Though this petition ls filed to quash the proceedings against the petitioner in the SC, during the course of arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner restricted his arguments to the extent of dispensing with the presence of the petitioner before the trial court
4. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted to pass appropriate orders in the petition
6. A perusal of the record discloses that the petitioner is facing the offences under Sections 85, 115(1),292 & 351(2) of BNS and Section 3(1XrXs) of SC & ST. Considering the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Court deems it appropriate to dispense with the attendance of the petitioner before the trial court.
7. Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is disposed of dispensing with the attendance of the petitioner before the trial court provided she is represented by a counsel before the trial court on every date of hearing and shall appear before the trial court whenever her presence is required during the course of trial. Miscellaneous Petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. d/. V.HARI PRASAD EPUTY REGISTRAR S I \ /TTRUE COPY// CTION OFFICER ,/ Cnba " To, iT[:'sl,ti1'*11*'tF[:]"le'"H3gi'ft '?'t'#ft ilsg?*;. Nizamabad.
5. Perused the record. I \
3. Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana, at
Hyderabad. [OUT] . One CC to Mr. SYED AHMED, Advocate [OPUC] Two CD Copies Fe-s/ u-- \
HIGH COURT DATED: 3111212025
ORDER
CRLP.No.17921 ot 2025 ttt, 2026 * o Accordingly, this Criminal Petition is Disposed of. l*-c L/l\-J a+f ,f za .:- -' @