Telangana High Court
CRLP/16636/2025 of Bangaru Sathipandu alias Bangaru Satti Babu Vs The State of Telangana on 31 December 2025
COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE THIRry FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE K. SUJANA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 16635 OF 2025 Between: Bangaru Sathipandu about 47 years, Oc Nilayam, Road No. 1 , AND @ Bangaru Satti Babu,
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
WEDNESDAY, THE THIRry FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE K. SUJANA
CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 16635 OF 2025
Between:
Bangaru Sathipandu
about 47 years, Oc
Nilayam, Road No. 1 ,
AND
@ Bangaru Satti Babu, S/o Bangaru Appal Naidu, Aged . Business, Rio H.No.'1 1-11-5l'lA, Flat No.201, Mahenter Telephone Colony, Saroornagar, Ranga Reddy District .,PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.1
The State of Telangana, rep by its Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad, through SHO, Saroornagar P.S, Rachakonda Commissionerate
...RESPONOENT/COMPLAINANT
Petition under Section 482 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to enlarge the petitioneriAccused no.1 on bail in the event of their arrest in connection with F.l.R.No,1 19112025, dated 21 .11.2025, on the file the P.S. Saroornagar, Rachakonda , for offences Uls 144 (2) BNS, Sec.3, 4, 5 plT
Act, dated 2111112025
This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Smt. MOGILI
ANAVENI, Advocate for the Petitioner and D. ARUN KUMAR Additionat pubtic Prosecutor on behalf of the Sole Respondent The Court made the following: ORDER
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TEL TNGANA
AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE K. SU.I TNA
CRIMINAL PETITION No.16636 of 2O2i
DATE:.31-L2-2O25
BBTtrIEEN:
Bangaru Sathipand u
petitioner/ a r :ust:d No. 1
And
The State of Telangana,
Rep. by its Public Prosecutor,
High Court for the Statc of Telangana
at Hyderabad.
.....Responder.rt/' rmplainant
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
This Criminal Petition is filed under Sec t 'n 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for sl-rrt 'LINSSJ for grant of pre-irrrest bail to the petitioner, who i; arrayed as accused No.1 in Crime No.1 191 of 2025 ,efore the & \ \
Sl(sr, Crl.P. o.16636 of2025 Saroornagar Police Station, Rachakonda Commissionerate, registered for the offences punishable under Section V4(21 of BNS and Sections 3, 4, 5 of PIT Act.
2. The brief facts of the case arc that on 21.17.2025, on receipt of credible information, the police of Saroornagar conducted a raid at Hotel llonest Grand Lodge, Dilsukhnagar, and apprehended two alleged organize rs, one customer artd one woman, and seized cash and other material. Based on the alleged confessional statements of the apprehended accused, the petitioner was shou'n as accused No. 1 and was alleged to be the main organizer, though he was not present at the scene and no material was seized from him.
3. Heard Smt. Mogili Anaveni, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner as rvell as Sri D. Arun Kumar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of the respondent - State.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner was falsely impiicated and had no connection with the hotel or the alleged activities, and that the only basis for \ \
t-\ -nrE! \ \. - SKS,J Crt.P l ,.16636 of 2025 of the other accused pima facie indicate his role. r organizing the alleged activities. Considering the gravity arr I nzrture of the offcnces alle gcd under Section laaQ) of BNS r rd Sections 3, 4 and 5 of the PIT Act, and thc lact Lhat the in, srigzrrion is still in progress, Lhis Court is not inclined to gra I prc-arrest baii to the petitioner at this stage.
7. Accordingll', this Criminal Pctition is dismis; .rl Misccllaneous applications, if any pending. ;hall star-rd closed //TRUE COPY// sd/- T.sRtDEV| ASSIS TANT REGISTRAR <_ \J/ iECTION OFFICER t To, VM/BA
1. The Special Judicial First Class Magistrate(Excise)-cum-t/ Additional Junior Civil Judge-cum-V Additional Metropolitan Magistrbte at t { Nagar, Ranga Reddy District
2. The Station House Officer, Saroornagar Police Station, Sa oornagar, Rachakonda District
3. One CC to Smt MOGlLl ANAVEN|Advocate tOpUCI
4. Two CCs to Public Prosecutor, High Court for the Staie o, -elangana at Hyderabad [OUT]
5. Two CD Copies I 't ,l
HIGH COURT DATED: 3111212025
ORDER
CRLP.No.15636 of 2025 ,l rS1HE SIA [ { [tB ?$2t (J * ,l \ qh d\ DISMISSING THE CRIMINAL PETITION