Telangana High Court

CRLP/17918/2025 of Abdul Kareem Vs The State of Telangana on 31 December 2025

Kareem, Sio Abdul Salam, age 39 years, Occ. Pvt. Employee, Rl/o H.No 6-21-6, East Point Colony, China waltair, L B Colony Vizag 530017. 2. Abdul Salam, S/o Shaik Ali, aged 68 years, Occ. Pvt. Employee, Rl/o H.No 6- 21-6, East Point Colony, China waltair, L B Colony Vizag 530017. 3.

Between :

1. Abdul Kareem, Sio Abdul Salam, age 39 years, Occ. Pvt. Employee, Rl/o H.No 6-21-6, East Point Colony, China waltair, L B Colony Vizag 530017.

2. Abdul Salam, S/o Shaik Ali, aged 68 years, Occ. Pvt. Employee, Rl/o H.No 6- 21-6, East Point Colony, China waltair, L B Colony Vizag 530017.

3. Asharifunnisa, W/o Abdul Salam, age 55 years, Occ.House Wife, (Mother of Al), R/o H.No 6-21-6, East Point Colony, China waltair, L B Colony Vizag

530017.

134441

IN THE HIGH COURT FORTHE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD

WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA

CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 17918 OF 2025

...Petitioner/Accused Nos.1 to 3

The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Telangana, at Hyderabad

AND

,|

2. Smt. Nasreen Sabha, Wo Abdul Kareem,

Wife, Caste. Muslim, Fi/o H No. B-1-3291C

Hyderabad.

aged 29 Years, Occupation. House

Brindavan Colony, Tolichowki,

...Respondents/Complainant

Petition under Section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the impugned proceedings in C.C.No.3215 of 2022, on the file of the Xlll Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate at Nampally, Hyderabad.

l.A. NO: 2OF 2025:

Petition under Section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant interim stay of all further proceedings in C.C.No.3215 of 2022, on the file of the Xlll Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate at Nampally, Hyderabad, including appearance and attendance of the petitioners/accused pending disposal of the above criminal petition.

This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri Ramesh Kadari, Advocate for the Petitioner and Mr.Jithender Rao Veeramalla, Additional Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.'l .

The Court made the following: ORDER

--/

I

Page 1 of 3

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD

THE HON'BLE SMT.JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVIEADA

CRIMINAL PETITION No.17918 ot 2025

Oate:31.12.2025

Between:

Abdul Kareem and 2 others

...Petitioners/Accused Nos.1 to 3

And

State of Telangana,

Rep. by the Public Prosecutor,

High Court for the State of Telangana,

Hyderabad and another

... Respondents

ORDER:

This criminal petition is filed by the petitioners seeking to quash the proceedings against them in CC No.3215 of 2022 on the file of the Xlll Additional Chief Metropolitan l\4agistrate at Nampally, Hyderabad, registered for the offences under Sections 498-A, 506 IPC and Sections 3 & 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act (for short'DP Act').

2. Heard Mr. Ramesh Kadari, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr.Jithender Rao Veeramalla, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the respondent No.1 -State.

3. Though this petition is filed to quash the proceedings against the petitioners in CC, during the course of arguments, learned counsel I

Page 2 of 3

2 for the petitioners restricted his arguments to the extent of dispensing with the presence of the petitioners before the trial court

4. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted to pass appropriate orders in the petition.

5. Perused the record.

6. A perusal of the record discloses that the petitioners are facing the offences under Sections 498-4, 506 IPC and Sections 3 & 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act (for short 'DP Act'). Considering the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners, this Court deems it appropriate to dispense with the attendance of the petitioners before the trial court.

7. Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is disposed of dispensing with the attendance of the petitioners before the trial court provided they are represented by a counsel before the trial court on every date of hearing and shall appear before the trial court whenever their presence required during the course of trial Miscellaneous Petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed //TRUE COPY// Sd/. B.REKHA RANI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER

1. The Xlll Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate at Nampally, Hyderabad

2. The Station House Officer, WPS CCS DD Police Station, Hyderabad City.

3. Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High Court for the state of Telangana, at Hyderabad. [OUT]

4. One CC to Sri Ramesh Kadari, Advocate [OPUC] 5 Twn Cn Cnnies Io Bal

HIGH COURT DATED:3111212025

ORDER

CRLP.No.17918 ot 2025 DISPOSING OF THE CRLP lHE S ( o t- 1 3 r{:B 202$ (-P x Ks sef rf za O. *

Page 3 of 3

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead