Telangana High Court
CC/3494/2025 of Areef Ahmed Khan Vs Sri Sandeep Kumar Sultania, I.A.S on 29 December 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD I\4ONDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3494 OF 2025 Contempt Case filed Under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act R/w Article 215
,ii'
\
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
I\4ONDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF DECEMBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3494 OF 2025
Contempt Case filed Under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act R/w Article 215 of the Constitution of lndia to punish the respondents herein wilfully and wontedly deliberately/violating/disobeying the Orders of the High Court dated 10-07- 2025 passed in W.P.No.19593 of 2025.
Between:
Areef Ahmed Khan, S/o Esak Ahmed Khan, aged about 62 years, Retd.
Superintendent O/o The Executive Engineer, lrrigation Division No.4, Mahabubnagar, R/o H.No.10-91/5/8, Near Rabia Majid, Marlu, Palakonda Road, tvlahaboobnaga r (PPO. No. 1 1 -0202621 SP)
... Petiti one r/Petitioner
AND
1. Sri Sandeep Kumar Sultania, l.A.S, Now Principal Secretary, Finance and Planning Dept, Government of Telangana, Secretariat, Hyderabad.
2. Sri K.S.R.C.Murthy, Director of Treasuries and Accounts, Govt. of T.S.
lnsurance Buildings, Abids, Hyderabad.
...Respondents/Respondent No.1 and 2
in main W.P.
Counsel for the Petitioner: Mr. P. Venkat Reddy Counsel for the Respondents: None Appeared The Court made the following: ORDER
\
t
(-'
IN 'fHE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAI(A
CONTEMFT CASE No.3494 OF 2025
29.L2.2()25
Betweern:
Areef A,emed Khan
...Petitioner
AND
Sri Sandeep Kumar Sultania, I.A.S, and another
...Respondents
ORDER:'-
This Contempt Case is filed under Sections 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 for wilful disobedience of the order dat.ed 1O.O7.2025 passed in W.P.No.19593 of 2025.
2.
When the matter was taken up for consideration, learned Governm=nt Fleader for Finance Department, appearing for the t (
respondents, placed on record a letter dated 27.12.2025
addressecl from respondent No.1, wherein it was stated that, rn complianc:e with the orders of this Court, the payment of pensionary benefits in C.C.No.3494 of 2025 in W.P. No.19593
of 2025 has been successfully processed and disbursed, and
\
To,
the payment details were enclosed. Therefore, it is stated that the respondents had compried with the order dated lo.or.2o2s passed by this court in W.p.No.19593 of 2025.
Recording the said submissions, the contempt case is closed. No costs Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shail stand closed.
sd/- N.
DRA SEKHAR RAO
REGI
//TRUE COPY//
OFFICER
1. One CC to Mr. P. Venkat Reddy, Advocate [O
2. Two CD CoPies
kam9
tt
HIGH COURT
DATED ii2911212025
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
CC.No.3494 ol 2025 CLOSING THE CC I fJ S THE f ?ffi iB
( * ( * Ir